Jump to content

BrockOlly

Moderator
  • Content Count

    281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

BrockOlly last won the day on April 29

BrockOlly had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

208 Excellent

About BrockOlly

  • Rank
    Rising Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,005 profile views
  1. Ayy I got the same case Simplest 1 monitor, wrong keyboard, no mousepad setup imaginable; Ryzen 5 2600, Geforce RTX 2070, Gigabyte X470, 16GB Ram, 2TB storage
  2. Hey, sorry for the late reply, the tag got burried and I forgot about it. You came to me after the kick, explaining what happened, and I believe that the punishment can be lifted, as there was no malicious intent.
  3. Hey, thanks for reporting Judging from the video evidence and the responses, I feel like no rules were intentionally broken here. Instead of trying to RP the scenario, you just shoot him because the rules say you can. Not really the RP I want to see from you.
  4. Hey This is starting to become a game of tag, but this ban was issued by NBDY, not by me. Senior Admins will deal with the appeal.
  5. Hunger and Food system has been reworked. Locked & Archived
  6. Hunger and Food system has been reworked. Locked & Archived
  7. Hunger and Food system has been reworked. Locked & Archived
  8. Ban was issued by NBDY, you are also permanently banned from the server itself Will be dealt with by senior staff
  9. I like a hunger and thirst aspect like we have right now, but it shouldn't be on your mind at all times, it should be a daily "oh, I got to eat and drink" moment, instead of a constant "frick I'm dying I need to drink rn" +1 eating once or twice a day is my preferred amount
  10. Hey, thanks for appealing your ban. You kill someone merely because you *thought* he was going to rob you? Not really a good reason to kill someone, wouldn't you think? This was the 2nd DM report on you, the first one can be found here. We expect people to know the rules when they play on the server, hence why we have the application system. I don't know how you possibly thought this was the right way to do things, twice. The descision ultimately lies on the senior staff, so it's pending their input. I personally don't feel like this behavior is welcome.
  11. Since he did not respond, we'll go ahead and conclude the report, though I doubt his input would have changed the result. Following punishment will be applied: Id 65 | Davis_Carter | @DavisCarter | Deathmatch | Offence #2
  12. Since he did not respond, we'll go ahead and conclude the report, though I doubt his input would have changed the result. Following punishment will be applied: Id 178 | Davis_Carter | @DavisCarter | Deathmatch | Offence #1
  13. BrockOlly

    ID 49 (DM)

    Hey, thanks for replying! This is not the reaction we expect from police officers, you say he did not "comply" with your demands, yet your demands were given as an officer without a weapon drawn, and was more an inquiry rather than a demand under gunpoint. If someone doesn't obey you as an officer, your first reaction should not be to shoot the person, nor the vehicle in this case. The rules are the same for everyone on the server, you cannot shoot to disable a vehicle just because he drove away and didn't want to listen. Following punishments will be applied: id 49 | Marshall_Rias | @SgtRiasBaixas | Deathmatching | Offence #1
×
×
  • Create New...