Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

16 Good

About Rubsmeister

Recent Profile Visitors

168 profile views
  1. Rubsmeister

    Increased AFK timer.

    I understand the worries people have about this, however I feel the current time is far too low. Right now you get kicked for being AFK before you can even finish robbing a store. For the person pointing the gun this can be especially annoying as sometimes the shopkeeper tends to have a weird hitbox and puts his hands down when you try to move to avoid the AFK timer. The AFK timer is doing far more harm right now then it is actually solving: People that really want to not get kicked for being AFK find a way to work around it anyway. So should it be removed then? No, it definitely shouldn't. We shouldn't make it easier for people to go AFK. However I do feel a change is needed considering that the way the system works right now, it causes more hinderance than it solves problems.
  2. Rubsmeister

    Change the 6.2.1/6.2.2 Metagaming Rule

    Looks really good. Very clear and compact, not overcomplicated. Definitely a +1 from me.
  3. Rubsmeister

    Change the 6.2.1/6.2.2 Metagaming Rule

    Great job derailing a really interesting and fruitful discussion between players that care a lot about the server and it’s rules and turning it into completely baseless slander. You are permanently banned for breaking more rules than you can probably count (including metagaming by the way), try to atleast selfreflect a little bit before pointing the finger at everyone else again. As to Helene’s point: I think you are absolutely correct. Playing on this server is a lot of fun, obviously you want to talk to your friends about your experiences. Metagaming should be about punishing players who try to get an edge over other players through nonRP means such as thirdparty communication software. I shouldn’t be getting punished for wanting to share the fun I’m having with my friends. Zilian Dent
  4. Rubsmeister

    Mask 7808_9530, Mask 8062_4704, Mask 5455_5688. 6.1, 7.2.1

    I'd like to point out that Mask 8062_4704 also said "accept the frisk" and that Mask 7808_9530 also shot me. (If you watch the video in 1080p you can clearly see that his gun moves and he fires a shot). As to you accusing me of playing "dumb", you are saying something out of character in character. My character does not understand what you mean by saying "accept the frisk". Imagine getting robbed in real life and a man just glares at you blankly while yelling "accept the frisk". I gave you a chance to RP by asking you to explain what you meant or for you to do some /me's and /do's, but you didn't do any of that, you just shot me. I don't think anything more needs to be said, the evidence is quite clear. I'll leave up to staff now to make a judgement.
  5. Player(s) being reported: Mask 7808_9530, Mask 8062_4704, Mask 5455_5688 Date of rule breach:9-12-2018 Time of rule breach: 20:41 GMT+1 Your characters name: Zilian Dent Other players involved: - Specific rule broken: 6.1 IC and OOC. 7.2.1 Deathmatch is the act of killing or hurting another player (or damaging their property) without a proper roleplay reason. An attempt to break this rule will result in a temporary or permanent ban. How did the player break the rule?:During a robbery the robbing party told me to "accept frisk" over VOIP, which is breaking the IC and OOC rule. After asking them what they meant by that (as that RPly makes no sense), they told me I was stupid and shot me. Evidence of rule breach:
  6. Rubsmeister

    Robbed by a gang while under 1000 XP

    This whole report is a mess... it is in the wrong format and there isn't even any actual evidence. If staff still wants me to give my side I'll do it, but with the state this report is in I don't even want to waste my time. Zilian Dent (Mask 4278_7788)
  7. Rubsmeister

    Los Zetas

    Robbing a store with the boys.
  8. Rubsmeister

    Los Zetas

    Settling some beef with a good talk.
  9. Rubsmeister

    [ACCEPTED] Stranger 4671_6155 (DM)

    Hello? It’s been over a week now?
  10. Rubsmeister


  11. Rubsmeister

    [ACCEPTED] Stranger 4671_6155 (DM)

    I think I have made my point quite clear, I did nothing to warrant a KOS, regardless of what my “buddies” did. I am not going to argue with you any longer. We’ll wait for a staff member’s decision
  12. Rubsmeister

    [ACCEPTED] Stranger 4671_6155 (DM)

    You are not following the rule you posted yourself. You did not witness your friend getting robbed/hurt. On top of that, I was not involved in the robbery/shooting of your friend, so even if you woud have witnessed it, you still wouldnt have a reason to KOS. Me ripping the mask of your friend’s face and searching him for his ID is not threatening his life.
  13. Rubsmeister

    [ACCEPTED] Stranger 4671_6155 (DM)

    Player(s) being reported: Stranger 4671_6155 Date of rule breach: 30 October 2018 Time of rule breach: 20:30 GMT+1 Your characters name: Zilian Dent Other players involved: Mia Norr, Alexey Alexeev Specific rule broken: " 7.2.1 Deathmatch is the act of killing or hurting another player (or damaging their property) without a proper roleplay reason. An attempt to break this rule will result in a temporary or permanent ban. " How did the player break the rule?:I had just logged in when I saw a few bodies of people I knew. I went over to talk to them and after looking around for a bit I got shot by a guy that came out of nowhere. Evidence of rule breach:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Tbsp1liPJM&feature=youtu.be
  14. Rubsmeister

    Rubsmeister - Zilian Dent (Discord appeal)

  15. Rubsmeister

    Mask (4278_7788) 6.5; 7.1

    I'm not lying, I am telling the truth. You are accusing me of lying when you have no way to prove that my gangmembers didn't just find out through legit means. You assume that you covered your tracks but obviously someone ran their mouth and told us. Now obviously I did not record any of this situation because I didn't think I was breaking the rules. If I were to record everything I was doing I would run out of disk space very quickly. In this reply you throw in yet another accusation that you cannot back up with evidence which makes you all the less believable.