Jump to content

Chebbidy

Moderator
  • Content Count

    158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Chebbidy last won the day on September 28 2019

Chebbidy had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

316 Excellent

About Chebbidy

  • Rank
    Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

878 profile views
  1. Hi there, I'll be handling this report. Please allow me to conclude based on the provided evidence. Thanks, Moderator Chebbidy
  2. I think it's a good idea, but i think it should only become an item if someone wants to take it from you. I can't see going to get a license from DMV being useful the amount of times some people die, however, I feel like it should stay tagged to you until a criminal does /takelicense from you. Then it becomes an actual object. Don't know if I explained that correctly but w/e
  3. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Hi there @firsty and thank you for such a detailed response. I am going to analyse your points and break them down to further understand your viewpoint. When looting people, an automatic /ame is displayed showing your of course looting their body. Considering players are ACTIVELY involved in this RP a fair chance to deny your /carrybody request must be offered, otherwise it is powergaming. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt on this considering there was not a lot of detriment to the RP and potentially this could've been something unknown to yourself. Please ensure you RP /mes and /dos appropriately in future as this is something that can harm roleplay if not adhered to correctly. Now you have been verbally warned I expect to see such actions exercised in character. Roleplay does NOT always have to be directly involving the parties on scene. You could've took the opportunity to roleplay piece by piece. This is, for all intents and purposes, a game. I fully understand your viewpoint regarding hitting the blockade at 200km/h and I agree. From taking such a hit you would potentially be either dead or critically injured. There was NO RP engagement involved in this scene whatsoever. An accident had occured and the hit was absolutely unintentional. @firsty could've chose a better way to roleplay this but used it as an opportunity to kill the two players involved. I also wanted to highlight my point around you killing the passenger involved in the wreck. You did not have to kill them at all considering they were not the one driving and on top of that it looks like they attempted to engage in some sort of detailed roleplay which you seemed to ignore and carried on shooting her. I would now like to touch base on the Metagaming side of things, alongside briefly covering the NLR perspective pertaining to this report. In the video supplied by @Yputi you can be seen carrying your friend off into the distance before hopping into your car and going your own way. I suspect that in this scenario you looted him, left his body there and went straight to MD to pick him up as outlined in the initial reporting parties video. For this, you will be receiving a meta-gaming punishment due to using OOC information to benefit your IC experience as outlined in our guidelines. Leaving your friend to die with the knowledge you could pick him up later is in direct violation with our meta-gaming policies. On top of that, you had turned up to directly interact with parties involved in a previous life. For this, both Jamal_Jacksons and Chris_Davidsons will be receiving Non-Roleplay offenses for direct breaches of our new life rule policy. Overall my analysis concludes the following viewpoint; ( TLDR for some of you. ) This scene was an accident as so often happens within active roleplay. Your reaction to this scene was simply unacceptable. Even so, the passenger had not done anything in this scenario as they were not in control of the vehicle. Instead, they reacted by simply trying to roleplay the IC accident. You gunned both of them down with no interaction. For this Jamal_Jacksons will be receiving Deathmatching Offense #2. Chris_Davidson will be receiving Non-Roleplay Offense #7 and Jamal_Jacksons will be Non-Roleplay Offense #3 for breach of our New Life rule on both sides. This requires no further explanation. Jamal_Jacksons will also be receiving Metagaming Offense #1 for direct usage of OOC knowledge to benefit IC experience. I cannot prove that Chris_Davidsons had suggested this to Jamal_Jacksons so he will not be receiving any metagaming offenses. Overall that concludes this report. Thank you for giving me the required time to review as this was quite in-depth. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Moderator Chebbidy
  4. TRANSFER REQUEST Character to Transfer From: Skinny Gambino Character to Transfer To: Kane Mayhem Requested Transfer: Asset #1 Kamacho [plate KIDNAPT] Asset #2 3G Property in Mirror Park Asset #3 2G Property in El Burro Asset #4 Sea Shark Reason for Transfer: Recently, Skinny has quit a life of criminology after leaving one of the cities biggest gangs. He has finally decided to go legal and launch an enterprise of his own in Vice City, bolstering some of the cities biggest nightclubs. Kane Mayhem, a party-going businessman within Vice City decides to travel to Los Santos and fortunately the two both cross paths. Skinny asks Kane for a loan of 2.5 million after they discuss business for hours upon end. Kane agrees to do so, but will need some assets to secure the deposit. They come to the agreement that Skinny gives Kane all he has within Los Santos, being his cars and his houses. In return, Kane will grant Skinny the loan he needs to launch his project, however, he calls it even on the loan for the assets even though they do not total the required amount. All Kane asks is that in the future, Skinny grants him one favour... that day will soon come. ((My OOC reason is that I was alternating between two characters, one legal, one crim. I was removed from my crim faction as the guidelines they require is that no PD alts are enforceable. Simply put, I have had to move across from Crim to Legal full stop. I asked Lewis beforehand if this transfer request could be approved and he granted me the ability to post this.)) How would you transfer the asset(s) if approved? Transfer was completed 18/01/2020 2g was transferred to Scott_Curry then transferred to Kane_Mayhem 3g, Kamacho & Speedophile all transferred to Reece_Curry to Kane_Mayhem
  5. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Hi there and thank you for making the report @Yputi. I have decided that the report cannot yet concluded. I have some questions beforehand; Jamal Jacksons - {ID 72} - @firsty (Player has also been notified in game.) - Why did you apply DM rights to kill 22 & the reporting party in what seemed to be an accident instead of attempting to engage RP? This could've been handled a lot better and with the same outcome without the deaths of the involved parties. From what I can see no attempt was made to engage in RP. Why did you carry an injured player with no roleplay engagement? Why can you be seen interacting with involved parties before 30 minutes had surpassed? Please answer the questions above within 24 hours. If I dont get a response suitable enough we will conclude on the evidence provided. As well as being notified on the forums players have also been notified in game. Please do not comment on the report unless your response is critical and necessary. Thanks, Moderator Chebbidy
  6. Chebbidy

    ID 39 VDM

    REPORT ACCEPTED After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: ID 39 - Daniel_Tox - Deathmatching #1 | VDM - You drove away from the scene, then drove directly at ID 77, as he was stationary, and ran him over with your motorcycle. ID 39 - Daniel_Tox - Non-RP #1 & #2 - Breach of No Crime Zone & Ramming with Motorcycles as seen in the aforementioned evidence. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Kind regards, Sr. Support Jasmine Moderator Chebbidy
  7. REPORT ACCEPTED After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: ID 36 - Vlad_Vladimyrostov - Non RP #1 | Combat Logging - You disconnected from the server right as you were about to get arrested. You made no attempt, through Disc or IG as is required when you disconnect during active RP. ID 58 - Jeff_Kartoffeler- Non RP #2 | Combat Logging - You disconnected from the server right as you were about to get arrested. You made no attempt, through Disc or IG as is required when you disconnect during active RP. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Kind regards, Sr. Support Jasmine Moderator Chebbidy
  8. Hi. I asked for you to not comment any further and desist from arguing. The next post that doesn't pertain critical evidence will be warned for spamming. Thanks, Chebbidy
  9. Hi. Please desist from commenting on this report until I ask or until you provide crucial evidence that may influence the outcome of the report. Continuously bumping a post makes it significantly harder for me to conclude. Thanks. Chebbidy
  10. Hi there. I'll be handling this report. Please allow me to review the provided statements & evidence so far. Thanks, Chebbidy
  11. Just to add to this appeal the punished parties were issued a metagaming #2 offense by myself as of yesterday. Please see link to report as follows; Thanks, Chebbidy
  12. REPORT ACCEPTED After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: ID 71 George_Garcia - NON-RP #1 | Fear RP - You saw a man pointing a pistol at you and giving demands, and chose to return inside, not fearing for you life. ID 194 Crimson_Teodor - NON-RP #1 | Fear RP - You saw a man pointing a pistol at you and giving demands, and chose to return inside, not fearing for you life. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Kind regards, Sr. Support Jasmine Moderator Chebbidy
  13. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Hi there and thank you for submitting your report. The parties included haven't responded with sufficient evidence within the allotted time frame so i'll be concluding on the evidence provided. Wesley_Coleman (ID 27) @Racxes will receive Deathmatching #1 for attacking (if not Mercy Killing a friend) without DM rights. He can be seen doing this with NO prior communication which leads me to my next point below. He also attempted to ram the players included pre-engagement which can be seen screenshotted below. I fail to believe that he had witnessed the original shootout commence which he has failed to prove within the sufficient time frame. (Timestamps have been screenshotted below.) Wesley_Coleman (ID 27) @Racxes will also receive Non-RP #1 for breach of Fear RP. He was instructed to comply at gunpoint however drew his pistol with no fear for his life. Hans_Berg (ID 89) will also receive Non-RP #1 for using scripted vehicles to assist in illegal activities as outlined in our rules below. He used a money truck to pull up to a gang shootout. • Spawning a scripted work vehicle and using it for crimes or submerging any vehicle in water. Claus_Bear (ID 105), Wesley_Coleman (ID 27), Hans_Berg (ID 89)- Once again you have failed to supply sufficient evidence that no metagaming had occurred. There is no doubt in my mind that you were using external third parties to communicate as per the fact that you had all sequentially pulled up to the same gang shootout with no communication. If you feel this was issued incorrectly you can always appeal with full, unedited footage however this is something you consistently fail to supply as per the appeal outlined below. Claus_Bear (ID 105), Wesley_Coleman (ID 27), Hans_Berg (ID 89) will be issued with Metagaming #2 as a result of the situation and the explanation outlined above. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Thank you for reporting. This report is now locked & archived. Thanks, Moderator Chebbidy
  14. Hi, still no unedited footage?
  15. PLAYER REPORT PARTIALLY ACCEPTED Hi and thank you for allowing me to conclude this report; Timothy_Donovan (ID 194) @Ethan Turner {Will receive a logged admin warning about upholding DM standards within DOC} - So with the report submitted entirely it's hard to tell what happened beforehand however the approach that Timothy_Donovan took to this was entirely non-roleplay. There was no IC communication between the characters involved and this scene could've been handled a lot better. None of the players lost anything significant and there wasn't a lot to lose as they were jailed, however, it is important to note that DM standards are STILL required in prison regardless of what other people may be doing. Player will be receiving an admin warning viewable in their logs. If anything like this happens in future they will receive much stricter punishments as they have been notified in the past. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Thank you for reporting. This report is now locked & archived. Thanks, Moderator Chebbidy
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.