Jump to content

Dqniel

Moderator
  • Content Count

    1,085
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Dqniel last won the day on June 15

Dqniel had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

345 Excellent

About Dqniel

  • Rank
    Veteran

Recent Profile Visitors

3,501 profile views
  1. Refrain from posting and please remain patient while waiting for a final conclusion from any reviewing senior administrator or above. Some appeals may be answered quickly where as others require investigation and review that can take time. Pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  2. Hello, and thank you for making this player report! @ComanderJTC Please re-submit your report using the correct and required format which can be found in the thread below. Report is rejected and archived.
  3. Dqniel

    ID 168 NCZ Stealing

    Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. Sincere apologies for the delayed response. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence as well as taking the points stated above into consideration, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report. Player Andrew_Sanchez will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the No Crime Zone rules | Offense #4 First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of Non-Roleplay and the reasoning behind it. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that the actions of player Andrew_Sanchez are in violation of our Non-Roleplay rules. As you are unlawfully stealing someone else's property, you are committing a crime all while in a No Crime Zone, and therefore in violation of the rules. It is not hard to connect two and two together and come to the realisation that the item laying right next to the injured reporting party belongs to him, especially when the reporting party informed you multiple times that you were taking his belongings. Him informing you from the very beginning should have prompted you to return the item and resuming roleplay. With that being said, moving forward i urge you to remember not to commit any actions that can be classified as a crime while in a No Crime Zone, and be more cautious. Thank you for making this report! @vuki Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  4. Update The store has been sold! Congratulations to the new owner, and i wish you the best of luck moving forward as the newest owner of Redwood General Store. Sincere thanks for all the interest. Kind regards, Jason Castillo
  5. Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. Sincere apologies for the delayed response. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence as well as taking the points stated above into consideration, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report. Player Grim_Grimes will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the Fear Roleplay rules | Offense #1. First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of Non-Roleplay and the reasoning behind it. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that the reporting party approaches player Grim_Grimes from behind while having a weapon aimed at him and utilizes the voice chat to make his demands. The reporting party acknowledges the demands and in turn equips his weapon, turns his back and begin firing at the reporting party before ultimately being gunned down. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that the actions of player Grim_Grimes are in violation of our Non-Roleplay rules. If you are held under direct gunpoint at close range, which essentially means that you are in a vulnerable and life threatening situation, you are expected to display an adequate and realistic amount of fear for the life of your character, and follow every demand given to you as one instinctively would do in real life. As you were completely unarmed and defenseless at the time of you being placed under gunpoint and given demands, you are not exempt from acting under the fear roleplay rules and the appropriate response would be to comply with the demands being made upon you rather than equipping your weapon, turning your back and beginning to fire. Yourself and your friends outnumbering the reporting party in terms of numbers should not make you disregard the fear roleplay rule entirely, as you were at a clear disadvantage and your allies were nowhere close to being able to help you during this situation. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and making sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Secondly, i am not quite sure what your involvement on this report is, and in the possibility that you are not please refrain from posting on reports that you are not involved in unless you have circumstantial evidence that could change the outcome of the report. I understand your need for wanting to give a personal input on the situation, but for future reference follow the guidelines surrounding commenting on (other) reports, thank you! @rhiome Thank you for making this report! @CurtisJackson Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  6. Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to us by the reporting party. Player Alfredo_Martinez will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for Powergaming | Offense #1. To start off, we would like to address the punishment of powergaming and the reasoning behind it. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that your actions are in violation of the powergaming rules. It is the general consensus (but also outlined in the rulebook) that you must always engage in roleplay through the use of /me and /do when patting down and searching another player, as to allow the other player a chance to roleplay a response to your actions - doing otherwise would fall under powergaming. It is however understandable taking into consideration that you are a relatively new player and still acclimating to the server. As players of Eclipse Roleplay we should all strive to provide the highest quality of roleplay that we can when encountering other players, so i urge you for future reference to always engage in roleplay when attempting to pat down and search another player. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and making sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Thank you for making this report! @GWXCORE Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  7. Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to us by the reporting party. Player Leroy_Watson will receive a punishment for Deathmatch | Offense #1. First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of Deathmatch and the reasoning behind it. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that as the reporting party is running up the hill in towards the direction of the bank, he is ultimately shot from behind by player Leroy_Watson all for seemingly no valid reason, and with no roleplay engagement having been established prior to doing so. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that the actions of player Leroy_Watson are in violation of our Deathmatch rules. As outlined in the rulebook, roleplay engagement as well as valid reason must be established prior to attacking another player. Attacking the reporting party in the way you did, with no roleplay engagement and no valid reason having been established prior, is not acceptable under any circumstances and falls under Deathmatch. Additionally, it is of my belief that your intentions during this situation were malicious, as you purposefully crouch with the intention of hiding your nametag in order for the reporting party to not know who he was shot by. Your actions during this situation falls under extremely poor roleplay and it is inexcusable. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and make sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Thank you for making this report! @mexicanwave Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  8. Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. Before we fully conclude this report, we would like to ask the reported party a follow up question. @SA Brian Jennings, do you have any footage displaying your point of view during this situation?
  9. Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to us by the reporting party. Player Abdul_Shaker will receive a punishment for Deathmatch | Offense #3. Player Abdul_Shaker will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for New Player Theft | Offense #5. Player Abdul_Shaker will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for using a scripted vehicle for criminal purposes | Offense #6. First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of Deathmatch and the reasoning behind it. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that your actions are in violation of our Deathmatch rules. As outlined in the rulebook, you must allow sufficient time for your victim to comply and acknowledge your demands and this was not the case here. Placing the reporting party under direct gunpoint at close range, and then giving him a mere three (3) seconds to comply and acknowledge your demands before you ultimately gun him down is not acceptable under any circumstances, and falls under Deathmatch. Ultimately, this seems to be a case of you being too quick to attack another player rather than allowing sufficient time for the reporting party to comply with your demands. As players of Eclipse Roleplay we should all strive to provide the highest quality of roleplay that we can when encountering other players, and killing the reporting party as quickly as you did eliminates any good roleplay that could have come out of that situation. Secondly, we would like to address the two Non-Roleplay punishments and the reasoning behind it. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that your actions are in violation of our Non-Roleplay rules. First and foremost, in the provided evidence it can be seen that you approached the injured player, and proceed to take his valuables which in this case was his weapon. As outlined in the Player Theft rules, a player with the “New Player” tag above their character may not be robbed unless it is in retaliation OR they deliberately insert themselves and or start active crime scenes, and as this was not the case you are in violation of our Player Theft Rules. Secondly, In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you used a scripted work vehicle from the bus job in order to conduct this criminal offense. The purpose of a scripted work vehicle are as the name suggests, to fulfill the duties of said scripted work and doing otherwise, specifically using it for criminal purposes would fall under non-roleplay and is not allowed as per our rulebook. Looking at your current appeal for your second offense of deathmatch, you stated that you are still in the process of learning all the rules and acclimating to the server, this does not however mean that you are immune to the server rules. It is your responsibility that the moment you begin playing on this server, you are knowledgeable enough of the rules to follow them in order to make the roleplaying experience for yourself and others in your surrounding a pleasant one. Please take these punishment(s) as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and make sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Thank you for making this report! @TeddyRuxpin Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  10. Dqniel

    ID 94/168 VDM

    Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence as well as taking the points stated above into consideration, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report. Player James_Doyle will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment. Player Corey_Aize will not receive any punishment(s). First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of player James_Doyle and the reasoning behind it. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you approach the reporting party with your warrener in what is supposedly an attempt to block the reporting party and restrict his escape path. As you attempt to do this, the reporting party quickly steers to his side and as you begin following him, the reporting party is ultimately rammed off his and mowed down onto the ground in the process. The issue that arises with this situation is that after extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that your actions are in violation of our Non Roleplay rules. After extensive review and consultation with multiple other staff members, we are in agreement that the reporting party was slightly careless with his bike as he decided to drive in-front of your moving vehicle, and while your initial intentions may have been to steer in towards the direction of the reporting party to block him in as you claimed, we are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that the ramming of the reporting party was indeed an accident, and not a purposeful and or malicious act. That does however not excuse your actions during this situation. The appropriate response to accidentally ramming someone in a way which (regularly) is against the rules, is to reach out and explain the situation through out of character means rather than resuming roleplay as if nothing had happened. There was no indication from you or any of the people involved that the ramming (which was done in an unprovoked manner with no roleplay engagement) was an accident, and instead you allowed the roleplay scenario to resume while you attempted to start your vehicle up. In saying that, by ramming the reporting party and continuing to roleplay after that, you displayed some very poor roleplay and in turn promoted poor quality roleplay for the people involved in this situation. While it is understandable that there was a lot of things going on during this situation, with cars left, right and center driving around, you had plenty of opportunities to explain the entire situation to the reporting party and redo the roleplay, which could have potentially avoided this entire report. I hope you take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and make sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Thank you for making this report! @Shorty Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  11. Dqniel

    ID 71 Fear RP

    Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. Sincere apologies for the delayed response. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence as well as taking the points stated above into consideration, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report. Player Thomas_Caprice will not receive any punishment(s). First and foremost, we would like to address the lack of punishment for player Thomas_Caprice and the reasoning behind it. After extensive review of the provided evidence, we are in agreement that the action(s) of player Thomas_Caprice is not in violation of any rule(s) based on these following points. Comparing the provided evidence from both parties involved in this report, it can be seen that the situation which follows beyond the point of you holding Thomas_Caprice under gunpoint is a clear case of de-sync. We are willing to give Thomas_Caprice the benefit of the doubt that he did not purposefully enter the car when placed upon gunpoint, but rather had pressed the key unknowingly that you were waiting and planning to ambush him. There is no way to cancel an already started animation of entering a vehicle, which would explain why Thomas_Caprice did not stop the moment you began delivering your demands. In addition to this, it is of our belief that the split second you had the weapon aimed at Thomas_Caprice before the de-syncing issues started occurring is not enough for him to be required to roleplay fear, and by the time the both of you had synced up with one another, Thomas_Caprice was exempt from acting under the fear roleplay rules as your view of him was obstructed as well as him having an equipped weapon in hand and was faced towards you at the time. Thank you for making this report! @gey Report is denied and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  12. Dqniel

    ID172 (Non-RP)

    Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions, myself and @domis have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to us by the reporting party. Player Pavel_Antonov will not receive any punishment(s). To start off, we would like to address the lack of punishment for player Pavel_Antonov and the reasoning behind it. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence, we came to the conclusion that the actions of Pavel_Antonov are not in violation of any rule(s) based on these following points. There is nothing in the provided evidence that would suggest that you and the reported party were in any type of active roleplay when he decided to log out, and as you do not have any footage leading up to the situation of him disconnecting from the server, this report will be rejected on the basis of insufficient evidence. For future reference, i sincerely encourage you to please not take reporting another player lightly and reserve player reports for situations that have caused severe loss or were abused for benefit, as stated in the Player Report Guidelines. Thank you for making this report! @Pegasus_ Report is denied and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
  13. Dqniel

    ID 94/168 VDM

    Hello, and thank you to everyone who has responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. Before myself and @domis fully conclude this report, we would like to ask a follow up question to the reported party. @CoreyAizyy and @Fitch1887, do either one of you have any recordings and pictures that would display your point of view during this situation? If so, please include it in your response, thank you!
  14. Dqniel

    ID 71 Fear RP

    Hello, and thank you for making this player report! @gey As the reported party, player Thomas_Caprice has already responded with his side of the story and explained the reasoning for his actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above, this report will be pending review from myself and @domis. Please remain patient while this is being extensively reviewed. Kind regards, Dqniel & @domis
×
×
  • Create New...