Jump to content

Dqniel

Administrator
  • Content Count

    1,274
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Dqniel last won the day on September 16

Dqniel had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

582 Excellent

About Dqniel

  • Rank
    Veteran

Recent Profile Visitors

4,642 profile views
  1. Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. After careful deliberation we have decided on the following outcome. Player Igor_Petrovich will receive a strong verbal warning. First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of player Igor_Petrovich and the reasoning behind it. After careful review, we have decided to give you the benefit of the doubt and the only reason this is not a formal punishment is because we chose to believe that you missclicked when you were unable to provide any evidence of the reporting party being under FearRP. In the future, you should know that it's your duty to inform them right then and there that you missclicked and should a similar incident happen again, you will surely receive a punishment. Player Javnish_Karinki will receive a deathmatch punishment. Secondly, we would like to address the punishment of player Javnish_Karinki and the reasoning behind it. It is not under any circumstances acceptable to shoot at players simply because other people are shooting at them. You must have established your own valid reason(s) to shoot at a player, at all times. Sincerely, alexalex303 and Dqniel
  2. Hello, and thank you for making this punishment appeal. I would like to start off by giving my sincerest apologies for the delay and thank you for remaining patient. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank @Emulsify for the tag. As per the punishment guidelines, player Jay_Khan was permanently banned for his third offense of Deathmatch. To provide some insight into the situation and explain the reasoning for this players punishment to the reviewing senior administrator or above, i will go ahead and refer to the initial forum report which resulted in this players punishment which is linked above. As for the appeal itself, i still stand by the original statement that i made on your initial appeal. I sincerely appreciate your honesty and the fact that you acknowledged your wrongdoings during the situation which resulted in your punishment. Prior to me issuing the punishment i had teleported to you in-game to explain the reasoning for the punishment and in response you were very understanding, apologetic and showed a willingness to improve based on your previous mistake. When we continued the conversation onto discord to discuss the issued punishment, you made it clear that your intentions were never malicious as you truly believed you had the right to attack the reporting party. Although you do not specifically mention what steps you have taken to ensure these types of rulebreaks do not happen again in the future, you did mention it in the previous appeal where you stated that you have re-read the rules thoroughly and plan on surrounding yourself around players with good roleplay. With that being said i would not be opposed to you being given a second chance under the condition that you re-read the rules once more and acknowledge that any further deathmatch punishments are not taken as lightly. The final decision lies in the hands of any senior administrator or above. Pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  3. Hello, and thank you for making this decision appeal. I would like to start off by giving my sincerest apologies for the delay and thank you for remaining patient. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank @Emulsify for the tag. To begin with, i would like to provide an in depth explanation of the reasoning behind the conclusion as well as address several of the points you made in this appeal. First and foremost, i would like to address the lack of deathmatch punishment and the reasoning behind it. Upon reviewing the provided evidence of this report, i decided that within the context of this situation and the range between your vehicle and the others, the reported party was close enough to realistically be able to hear your friend submit the distress call to the police and therefore act on it. The deathmatch rules state that reporting someone for a serious crime would justifiably warrant an attack, and as stated in the initial forum report it should come as no surprise that reporting a heavily armed group of gang members to the police has serious repercussions. I acknowledge and understand that you believe it is poor roleplay to be able to hear another player when that player is situated inside a vehicle with closed windows, but i believe consistency regarding this should be upheld on your end as in the provided evidence of the report it can be seen that you do the exact same thing you claim is poor roleplay in this report. In one of the clips submitted by the reported party it can be seen that you utilize the voice chat to communicate with another member of the zetas all while you are situated inside your own car with closed windows - it is of my belief that you can not conveniently decide when a certain player is heard from your vehicle and when they are not. I can not stress this enough, but contrary to what you stated you were not in a speedy chase at the time of the call being made and instead you were at a near standstill while being surrounded by multiple vehicles who realistically would have been able to hear your friends distress call to the police. Secondly, i would like to address the lack of punishment relating to the ramming being done upon you. The ramming in this situation was done equally as much on both sides, as you rammed the reporting party just as much as they rammed you. Reviewing the clips leading up to the situation in which you escape to the bank, it can be seen that you ram the comet as well as the supercar which would warrant an attack on you as per the deathmatch rules. I understand that these collisions may have been unintentional, but at the time no explanation as to why you rammed them were provided and for all we know the reported party could have been under the impression that it was deliberate and thus attacked based on this. Furthermore, as stated in the initial forum report, you made deliberate attempts to circle the same relatively small area in order to receive backup while a large of vehicles were pursuing you, in doing so you all but guaranteed some unintentional collisions as well. Thirdly and lastly, i would like to state the following. I acknowledge that you are not suggesting or accusing us of deliberately concluding this report in the favour of the zetas, however i feel like this needed to be addressed and not ignored. There was absolutely no communication with the reported party, any zeta affiliated member(s) or their leader regarding this report. The report was reviewed and concluded amongst myself and alex, based on our own judgement and perception of the situation. I don’t even know how the reported party or the leaders of the zetas would be able to contact us regarding this report, as there would be no way for ANYONE aside from myself and alex to know that we were taking this report. There was no formal announcement in the report thread stating that we were placing the report under review, and instead it was concluded on the spot as all the parties involved had provided a response. As a member of the Eclipse Roleplay staff team and a longstanding one at that, i pride myself in my ability to remain impartial and unbiased when it comes to handling reports, whether they are in-game or on the forums. Extensive effort and thought are put into all the reports and appeals that i handle, and this report is no different. I understand that you have no bad intentions with this appeal, and instead you are doing what any member of this community is fully entitled to do which is having the right to appeal, but i can not stress this enough - This report was not concluded in anyone's favour and instead it was done based on our judgement and perception of the situation. Pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  4. Hello, and thank you for making this punishment appeal. I would like to start off by giving my sincerest apologies for the delay and thank you for remaining patient. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank @CBullet for the tag. As per the punishment guidelines, player Lip_West was permanently banned for utilizing crosshairs to gain an advantage over other players. To provide some insight into the situation and the reviewing senior administrator(s) or above, i will go ahead and explain the situation which resulted in this players punishment to the best of my ability. I was contacted by another member of this community in regards to you utilizing crosshairs. This community member is in a prominent position of the gang you were attempting to join, and upon sending a picture of your administrative logs to this community member (which is standard practice for anyone joining an official faction) it could be seen that you had a perfectly aligned crosshair in the middle of the screen. This community member then confronts you about the crosshair, and in response you state that you had turned them on while joining into the server. The community member compiled your entire conversation along with the administrative log where your crosshair could be seen into one pile of evidence and sent it to me, upon which i deemed it sufficient enough to issue a punishment. As for the appeal itself, i appreciate the fact that you are sincere and honest but we have a zero tolerance policy towards cheating. The rule which resulted in your punishment is not new, and not only is it outlined in our rulebook but there have been several announcement regarding the policy of crosshair(s) and how it is not allowed. The fact that you were unbanned just days prior to this punishment being issued should have prompted you to review our rulebook once more and acknowledge that utilizing programs and or adding something on your screen to replicate a crosshair is strictly forbidden. It is ultimately your responsibility the moment you begin playing on the server that you understand our rules. This is a serious offense and as such this appeal will be under review by any senior administrator(s) or above. Pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  5. Dqniel

    ID 129 (FRP)

    Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. We would also like to take this opportunity to give my sincerest apologies for the delay and thank all parties involved for remaining patient while this report has been carefully reviewed. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence as well as taking the statements of all parties involved into consideration, we have decided to conclude this report. Player Benjamin_Specht will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the Fear Roleplay rules | Offense #2. First and foremost, we would like to address the punishment of Non-Roleplay and the reasoning behind it. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that the reporting party places you under direct gunpoint at close range in what is presumably an attempt to rob you. In turn, you disregard this entirely and begin running past the reporting party. The issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are not in accordance with our Fear Roleplay rules. If you are held under direct gunpoint at close range, which essentially means that you are in a vulnerable and life threatening situation, you are expected to display an adequate and realistic amount of fear for the life of your character, and follow every demand given to you as one instinctively would do in real life. The moment the reporting party aimed his weapon towards you, you were completely defenseless which would mean that you are not exempt from acting under the Fear Roleplay rules and your life was still in direct danger. It is of our belief that your first instinct while under direct danger should not be to disregard that entirely and continue running, but rather comply with the demands of the reporting party as you were completely defenseless at the time. Secondly, we acknowledge and understand that the character of the reporting party may not have loaded in fully during this situation, but there has been no provided evidence on your end to suggest this and as such we can only work with the evidence provided to us and conclude this report based on that. I sincerely encourage you to utilize the various different recording softwares should you be faced with a situation like this in the future. Thank you for making this report! @Ruby Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel & alexalex303.
  6. Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions i have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to me by the reporting party. Player Micheal_Devilla will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the Fear Roleplay rules | Offense #3. Player Michael_Devilla will receive a warning for out of character insults | Offense #1. First and foremost, i would like to address the punishment of Non-Roleplay and the reasoning behind it. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that the reporting party is holding you under direct gunpoint at close range while attempting to rob you. In turn, you stand up, face the reporting party and begin punching as well as kicking him. The issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are not in accordance with our Fear Roleplay rules. If you are held under direct gunpoint at close range, which essentially means that you are in a vulnerable and life threatening situation, you are expected to display an adequate and realistic amount of fear for the life of your character, and follow every demand given to you as one instinctively would do in real life. The moment that weapon was aimed at you, you were completely unarmed and defenseless and as such you were not exempt from acting under the Fear Roleplay rules and your life was still in direct danger. It is of my belief that your first instinct while under direct danger should not be to disregard that entirely and begin attacking the reporting party but rather comply with the demands being made upon you as you were completely unarmed and defenseless at the time. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and make sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Secondly, i would like to address the warning for out of character insults and the reasoning behind it. The choosing of words from the reported party is undoubtedly wrong, as all players should strive to provide mutual respect and enjoyable roleplay to one another. As specifically outlined in the Advertising & Public Chat (6) rules, players may not use offensive language in OOC, especially when directed as an insult towards other players. Regardless of how frustrating or annoying a situation may be, resorting to offensive language and insulting someone through /ooc is not the appropriate way to handle the situation, and is in violation of our rules. Reviewing your current administrative log you have been punished for out of character insult as soon as one day ago, which hints at a slight negligence towards our chat rules and policies and you will therefore receive this following punishment as a reminder of what not to do in the future. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and making sure that in the future you are more cautious of what you say towards other players. Thank you for making this report! @Sahandbagheri Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel.
  7. Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions i have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to me by the reporting party. Player Kuperis_Kavenskas will receive a punishment for Deathmatch | Offense #1. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you utilize your vehicle to run the reporting party over all for seemingly no valid reason without any previous roleplay engagement having been established. Shortly after, you circle around and then utilize your vehicle to hit the reporting party for a second time and ultimately place him in an injured state in the process. This goes without saying as the rulebreak in this situation is incredibly blatant, but the issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are not in accordance with our Deathmatch rules. As outlined in the Deathmatch section of the rulebook, valid roleplay reason as well as proper initiation and interaction must be established prior to attacking another player or their property, and as none of this was done on your end but rather you seemingly attacking another player at random, you are in violation of our Deathmatch rules. The roleplay as well as the actions displayed by you in this player report is absolutely not acceptable at any level, and is most certainly not welcomed on the server. I sincerely hope this punishment makes you reflect on your actions, read up on the rules and acknowledge that what you did during this situation is not acceptable in a million years in this community. Player Kuperis_Kavenskas will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the No Crime Zone rules | Offense #2. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you utilize your vehicle to unlawfully run over the reporting party a total of two (2) times all while being situated inside a No Crime Zone. The issue that arises with this situation is that you are in violation of our No Crime Zone rules. By unlawfully attacking the reporting party by running him over, you are commiting a crime all while being situated inside a No Crime Zone. As the name suggests and as is outlined in the rulebook, no actions that even come close to being classified as a crime may be done while you are in a No Crime Zone and therefore you are in violation of the rules. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and make sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Player Maksim_Kancar will receive a punishment for Deathmatch | Offense #3. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you approach the reporting party who was placed in an injured state and began to attack him repeatedly all for seemingly no valid reason without any roleplay engagement having been established prior. As you do not succeed in what i presume is your attempt at finishing and killing the reporting party off, you enter your vehicle and drive a short distance away from the reporting party before exiting the vehicle, equipping your weapon and beginning to fire at the reporting party which ultimately manages to kill him. This goes without saying as the rulebreak in this situation is incredibly blatant, but the issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are not in accordance with our Deathmatch rules. As outlined in the Deathmatch section of the rulebook, valid roleplay reason as well as proper initiation and interaction must be established prior to attacking another player or their property, and as none of this was done on your end but rather you seemingly attacking another player at random, you are in violation of our Deathmatch rules. Taking into consideration that there are two (2) other instances in which you have been punished for Deathmatch, this hints at an inability or unwillingness to learn the server rules based on past mistakes. The roleplay as well as the actions displayed by you in this player report is absolutely not acceptable at any level, and is most certainly not welcomed on the server. I sincerely hope this punishment makes you reflect on your actions, read up on the rules and acknowledge that what you did during this situation is not acceptable in a million years in this community. Player Maksim_Kancar will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the No Crime Zone rules | Offense #1. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you unlawfully attack and ultimately kill the reporting party all while being situated inside a No Crime Zone. The issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are in violation of our No Crime Zone rules. By attacking and killing the reporting party, you are commiting a crime all while being situated inside a No Crime Zone. As the name suggests and as is outlined in the rulebook, no actions that even come close to being classified as a crime may be done while you are in a No Crime Zone and therefore you are in violation of the rules. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and make sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated Last but not least, @HaminLord taking into consideration that this is an incredibly unfortunate situation which you had no control over, i urge you to submit a refund request if you suffered a loss greater than $25.000 in value. Make sure you follow the refund request guidelines and format as well. Thank you! Thank you for making this report! @ Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel.
  8. Hello, and thank you for remaining patient! As more than enough time has passed for the reported party to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions i have decided to conclude this report based on the provided evidence and statement given to me by the reporting party. To start off i would like to state the following in regards to the claim of Adrian_Zeus ban evading. As of 09/OCT/2019 player Adrian_Zeus was permanently banned for ban evading. This entire conclusion as well as the following punishments will be added to his administrative log for logging purposes, however i want to make it amply clear that this player is no longer an active player of this server or the community overall. With that being said, on to the final conclusion. Player Adrian_Zeus will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for utilizing a scripted work vehicle for crimes | Offense #2. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you utilize a scripted work vehicle for criminal purposes, which in this case is to steal the vehicle of the reporting party. The issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are not in accordance with our Non-Roleplay rules. The purpose of the scripted work vehicles are as the name suggests, to fulfill the duties of said scripted work and doing otherwise, specifically using it for criminal purposes would fall under non-roleplay and is not allowed. Player Adrian_Zeus will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the Fear Roleplay rules | Offense #3. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that the reporting party enters the backseat of your vehicle before equipping his weapon and placing you under direct gunpoint at close range while simultaneously making multiple demands for you to follow. In turn, you disregard these demands completely and begin driving away the moment the reporting party exits the vehicle. The issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are in violation of our Fear Roleplay rules. If you are held under direct gunpoint at close range, which essentially means that you are in a vulnerable and life threatening situation, you are expected to display an adequate and realistic amount of fear for the life of your character, and follow every demand given to you as one instinctively would do in real life. The moment that weapon was aimed at you, you were completely unarmed and defenseless and as such you were not exempt from acting under the Fear Roleplay rules and your life was still in direct danger. It is of my belief that your first instinct while under direct danger should not be to disregard that entirely and drive away the moment the reporting party exits the vehicle, but rather comply with the demands being made upon you as you were completely unarmed and defenseless at the time. Player Adrian_Zeus will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the Combat Logging rules | Offense #4. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that shortly after you manage to escape from the reporting party, you disconnect from the game. After extensively reviewing the chat logs of this situation, it can be seen that less than three (3) minutes after you manage to escape from the reporting party, you disconnect from the server. As no attempt(s) was made to inform any of the parties involved in the former roleplaying situation that you disconnect, it indicates that you leaving the server was not an accidental act but rather a purposeful and malicious one. As outlined in the Eclipse Roleplay rulebook, a player must wait fifteen (15) minutes from the moment that they manage to get away from a pursuit and or chase that they incited before they can disconnect from the server. As this was not the case, you are in violation of our rules. Thank you for making this report! @Dylan Ortiz Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel.
  9. Hello, and thank you to everyone who responded with their side of the story and explained the reasoning for their actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. I would also like to take this opportunity to give my sincerest apologies for the delay and thank all parties involved for remaining patient while this report has been carefully reviewed. After extensively reviewing the provided evidence as well as taking the statements of all parties involved into consideration, i have decided to conclude this report. Player Ryan_Ole will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for breaching the Fear Roleplay rules | Offense #1. Player Ryan_Ole will receive a Non-Roleplay punishment for mixing IC & OOC | Offense #2. First and foremost, i would like to address the Non-Roleplay punishment relating to the breach of Fear Roleplay and the reasoning behind them. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that the reporting party enters the backseat of your vehicle before equipping his weapon and placing you under direct gunpoint at close range while simultaneously making multiple demands for you to follow. In turn, you disregard these demands completely and begin driving towards the police station. The issue that arises with this situation is that your actions are in violation of our Fear Roleplay rules. If you are held under direct gunpoint at close range, which essentially means that you are in a vulnerable and life threatening situation, you are expected to display an adequate and realistic amount of fear for the life of your character, and follow every demand given to you as one instinctively would do in real life. The moment that weapon was aimed at you, you were completely unarmed and defenseless and as such you were not exempt from acting under the Fear Roleplay rules and your life was still in direct danger. Touching on the claim that you did not have to roleplay along with the reporting party because you had an out of character conversation is not plausible. The entire conversation was in-character and simply because the reporting party promised not to do anything in-character does not mean he is dictated by any server rules to uphold that. Similar to how it could happen in real life, you were deceived in-character into thinking no harm would be done towards you and that is fully allowed. I need you to understand to differentiate between In Character and Out Of Character. There are multiple script supported commands that would allow players to have a discussion Out Of Character, and in this situation neither one of you were utilizing this making the entire situation and the conversation In Character. Last but not least, It is of my belief that your first instinct while under direct danger should not be to disregard that entirely, but rather comply with the demands being made upon you as you were completely unarmed and defenseless at the time. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and making sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Secondly, i would like to address the Non-Roleplay punishment relating to the mixing of In Character and Out Of Character and the reasoning behind them. In the provided evidence of this report, it can be seen that you utilize the In Character VOIP to relay Out Of Character terms and words, otherwise known as mixing IC & OOC. It is incredibly important that you learn how to differentiate between the two terms, and i want to remind you that we have multiple script supported commands such as /b, /o and /ooc implemented for this exact reason. In situations like these you are expected to use them if you want to take something out of character and not utilize the in character means of communication simply because it is and i quote “faster”. Please take this punishment as an opportunity to reflect on your actions, and making sure that moving forward you do so in a way where this is not repeated. Thank you for making this report! @Rekamon Report is accepted and archived. Kind regards, Dqniel.
  10. Thank you for your sincere response. This will be pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  11. Hello, and thank you for making this punishment appeal. I would like to start off by thanking you for remaining patient while awaiting my response. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank @CBullet for the tag. As per the punishment guidelines, player Han_Spillner was permanently banned for his sixth (6) offense of Non-Roleplay. To provide some insight into the situation and for the reviewing senior administrator(s) or above, i will go ahead and refer to the initial forum report which resulted in this players punishment, linked below. As for the appeal itself, i feel as if more effort could have been put into it extending beyond a couple of words. The amount of administrative logs you have acquired in such a short time is alarming to say the least, and in this appeal you do not really describe how you will correct this behaviour. The last time you submitted your appeal you were specifically told by @ChuckM to provide an in depth explanation of what you did wrong, why it was wrong and how you will correct this behaviour if given another chance and in this punishment appeal i see none of this. The same answer you provide throughout all your appeals such as “I won’t do it again, please give me a second chance” does not suffice nor does it provide us with any assurance that you are able to play on this server without violating any further rules. You have been banned from the server for a very long time now, but significantly more effort explaining what you did wrong, why it was wrong and how you will correct this behaviour if given another chance needs to be provided in this punishment appeal. Ultimately, the final decision lies in the hands of any reviewing senior administrator(s) or above. Pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  12. Hello, and thank you for making this punishment appeal. I would like to start off by giving my sincerest apologies for the delay, and thank you for remaining patient. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank @Emulsify for the tag. As per the punishment guidelines, player Povil_Absolut was permanently banned for his seventh (7) offense of Non-Roleplay. To provide some insight into the situation and for the reviewing senior administrator(s) or above, i will go ahead and refer to the initial forum report which resulted in this players punishment, linked above. As for the appeal itself, i feel as if more effort could have been put into it extending beyond a couple of words. The fact that you got unbanned a little over a month prior to this punishment being issued is alarming to say the least, and in this punishment appeal you do not really describe how you will correct this behaviour. You have provided me with no assurance that you are able to play on this server without violating any further rules, and as such i would like to ask the following question(s): What do you plan on doing to avoid any further punishments should you be unbanned, and what type of precautions have you taken right now to ensure this? Ultimately the decision lies in the hands of any senior administrator or above. Pending review from a senior administrator or above.
  13. Hello, and thank you for making this player report! @Sahandbagheri Player Micheal_Devilla will receive 24 hours to respond with his side of the story, and explain the reasoning for his actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. First and foremost, why did you stand up, face the reporting party and begin attacking him all while he had you placed under gunpoint at close range? Secondly, why did you insult the reporting party at numerous times through out of character means? As the reported party does not have a forum account, he will be notified of this report in-game. Kind regards, Dqniel.
  14. Hello, and thank you for making this player report! @HaminLord First and foremost, player Kuperis_Kavenskas will receive 24 hours to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. First and foremost, why did you utilize your vehicle to run over the reporting party a total of two (2) times all for seemingly no valid reason and no roleplay engagement having been established prior? Secondly, why did you conduct all these actions while being situated inside of a No Crime Zone, do you feel as if this is acceptable roleplay? Secondly, player Maksim_Kancar will receive 24 hours to respond with his side of the story and explain the reasoning for his actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above. First and foremost, why did you approach the reporting party and begin attacking him by punching and kicking him all for seemingly no valid reason? Secondly, why did you drive off, equip your weapon and begin firing at the reporting party ultimately killing him all for seemingly no valid reason? Thirdly, why did you conduct all of these actions while being situated inside a No Crime Zone, do you feel as if this is acceptable roleplay? Looking forward to your responses! Kind regards, Dqniel
  15. Dqniel

    ID 129 (FRP)

    Hello, and thank you for making this player report! @Ruby The reported party, player Benjamin_Specht, has already responded with his side of the story and explained the reasoning for his actions which can be seen in the provided evidence above and as such this report will be one step closer to being concluded. Before i fully conclude this report however, i would like to ask one final follow up question to the reported party. Benjamin_Specht | @Appelgi, do you have any footage displaying your point of view during this situation? If so, please provide said footage in your response. Kind regards, Dqniel
×
×
  • Create New...