Jump to content

XposeD

Administrator
  • Content Count

    899
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

XposeD last won the day on November 19

XposeD had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

479 Excellent

About XposeD

  • Rank
    Esteemed Member

Recent Profile Visitors

2,108 profile views
  1. well it would be down to dealerships discretion wouldn't it but as an owner I wouldn't take someone warrener unless it was really worth my while
  2. The way it should work is they put into a menu what vehicle they want to add in towards their new car, then the owner puts in how much he will pay for it from them then that vehicle goes back into the dealership for resale and they get the funds to buy a new vehicle
  3. REFUND DENIED Thank you for posting this refund request. After reviewing the request and evidence attached to it, I've decided that you cannot receive a refund for any of the item(s) from your refund request. REquest doesn't meet minimum refund value of $25,000.00 This decision is final. Unless instructed too, if you post another refund request pertaining to this incident you will be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. Regards, XposeD
  4. Hello, This has been suggested before and did get spoken about in a future dealership update. Will it happen? Unsure, I hope so as a dealership owner. We call it Part Exchange in the UK. Mucho Lovio XposeD
  5. XposeD

    ID 111 VDM

    Hello! Seeing as the original footage is unsatisfactory and the reporter failed to provide the requested extended footage, this report will be rejected. Sincerely, @alexalex303 and XposeD Locked, Archived & Denied
  6. XposeD

    (DM, FearRP ) ID 64

    Hello all and thanks for your responses. After careful consideration, we have come to the following conclusion: Player ID 70 - Dario_Ortega will receive a Verbal Warning for his metagaming. I understand the context of there being a player that you can not rob for OOC reasons and wanting to continue the hunt for alternative victims, however, continuing the hunt was and should've been communicated IC. Player ID 66 - Tab_Yez will receive NonRP#2 for his powergaming. Regardless of receiving permission, you are not allowed to pick up the bodies of other players without proper roleplay. It is considered powergaming, and doing so during an action situation, such as a shootout, gives you a major advantage. Player ID 64 - Tyrone_Dark will receive DM#2 for his VDM. Since the players pointed their guns at you, you were well within your rights to fire upon them, however, you are not allowed to use your vehicle (as in the vehicle you stole from them) to attack them more than once, which is what you can be seen doing on the video. You claim that you did not do so on your screen, however, without a video of your own, we can only go on the current evidence provided. Sincerely, @alexalex303 and XposeD Locked & Archived
  7. Hello all and thanks for your response's. After careful deliberation we have decided upon the following outcome: Player ID 31 - Calvin_Johnsn - will receive DM#1 and NonRP#1 for his numerous unrealistic actions during this scenario. In the beginning, the two players, 31 and 29 can be seen waiting in an alley-way for the reporter to rob him, but the reporter was prepared and locked his doors. The passanger fails to board the taxi, and at that point, ID 31 aims a gun at him and tells him to get out of the car. The reporter immediately drives away, as he is not under fear RP. As he is driving away, you can hear a frustrated player through ID 31s microphone. I find the timing to be very peculiar, right after the botched robbery, however the voice does not seem to be of ID 29s, and as such the potential metagaming will be disregarded, because of reasonable doubt. ID 31 then fires on the vehicle of the taxi driver. I feel that if the taxi driver lingered more, this could've been justified, however, he immediately drove away, and as such, shooting him is classified as DM; furthermore, when approached at the bank by the taxi driver with a weapon, he was aimed at, and responded by stating IC (over the microphone) "No Crime Zone", more than once. Voice chat can only be used for IC communications, and this breach severely affected the immersion of everyone at the bank. Lastly, the player complained in /b repeadedly instead of going along with the RP and /reporting the reporter's alleged rule breaks. I strongly recommend that Calvin Johnsn re-read the server rules before resuming play on our server, as his current behaviour is bound to result in his play access being restricted. https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/forum/68-eclipse-roleplay-server-rules/ Sincerely, @alexalex303 and XposeD Locked & Archived
  8. hello I do not understand why I have been banned and would like to appeal it. my characters name is Jared Lunch

    1. Flucifial

      Flucifial

      make an appeal then bud. 

    2. tricuspidtub77

      tricuspidtub77

      I did sorry this was before I knew how to do it and I didn't know how to delete

  9. TRANSFER REQUEST ACCEPTED Thank you for posting this transfer request. After reviewing your transfer request and the reason for it, I've decided to approve a transfer of the following item(s) to Alicia Rodriguez from Joy Ryder BF 400 It is your responsibility to make this transfer happen and staff will not be interfering or assisting with the transfer. I also recommend that you do not make attempts to transfer any asset(s) outside of the approved asset(s) listed above, the transfer will be monitored through server logs. You are also not allowed to post a transfer request for another 14 days from this post. If you attempt to request a transfer prior to this deadline you will be muted from our forums temporarily. Regards, XposeD
  10. Hello and thanks for your responses, Although they are not the best and rather rude please in future keep it nice and friendly on a forum report. After careful consideration, we have decided upon the following outcome: Player ID 56 - Brian Walky - @MikeyyyG - was not in breach of Fear RP rules. He had a weapon in his hand and he was actively searching for people. We find that this constitutes an action scenario, and in such an event, he couldn't reasonably be expected to drop his superior weapon and surrender to a pistol. As seen in the video, he managed to easily kill you both. Sincerely, @alexalex303 and XposeD
  11. Hello all and thanks for your responses. After careful deliberation we have decided upon the following outcome: Player ID 178 - Jimmy_Barr - will receive NonRP #4 for their breach of FearRP. Player ID 1 - Freddie_Barr - will receive NonRP #2 for their breach of FearRP. The server rules are meant to help shape scenarios into realistic interactions between players, and are not to be used to give you unrealistic advantages. The FearRP clause relating to the engine being on is specifically meant so that you can drive away, as you could realistically make an argument for driving away when in a car with the engine on. However, if you choose to stay there and converse with someone aiming a gun at you, that's when you're behaving unrealistically, and in breach of FearRP. The driver should've drove away instantly, or surrendered. Anything else is unacceptable. The passenger had plenty of time to exit the car with their hands up as well, he was even typing in chat. Sincerely, @alexalex303 and XposeD Locked & Archived
  12. Hello again and thanks to all for waiting patiently. After careful deliberation, we have decided upon the following resolution: Player ID 111 - Sandro_Luther - will receive NonRP#2 and NonRP#3 for his breach of Fear RP and disconnecting during an active roleplay scenario. The breach of fear RP is very blatant with the man being aimed at close range from behind, and him withdrawing his firearm. The disconnect during an active roleplay scenario is blatantly on purpose as well, with the player even saying "cya" before he disconnects. Player ID 16 - Eddie_Junnior - will receive a Verbal Warning about his OOC conduct during this roleplay scenario. It is never appropriate to go into in a flurry of /b messages during an RP scenario, and especially not appropriate to threaten other community members with permanent bans. Sincerely, @alexalex303 and XposeD Locked & Archived @Loose500 feel free to appeal the decision: https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/forum/3-punishment-appeals/
  13. Hello I will not be needing Lesleys response. This is due to Lesley_Loose has already been banned because of the Cyber Threats. This is something we as a staff team take very seriously and will act upon in a really quick fashion. Kind Regards XposeD
  14. hello thanks for making this report. Calvin_Johnsn has 24hours to respond. Kind Regards XposeD
×
×
  • Create New...