Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Fuz last won the day on November 1 2020

Fuz had the most liked content!


707 Excellent

About Fuz

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

4,419 profile views
  1. Hi They engaged first and I only shot when I was shot at No POV Cheers
  2. Fuz

    The Vanguards

    Best of luck Romano & co
  3. PD/SD/other civilian/gov factions should also have handlers like the rest of the server/criminals do. I'd like to know why they don't and why their roleplay isn't monitored and critiqued. Bump
  4. I agree completely, this rule has single-handedly pushed nearly all the people I have met on the server away from the server or it has put them off criminal RP. I know personally that the biggest gangs and their members on the server no longer play/have disbanded and this rule was a major part of it. It has reduced to people spamming OOC and made the criminal aspect of the server not fun at all. The server has clearly pushed for keeping stuff IC and not dwell into OOC much, but this is a step in the wrong direction as criminals cannot operate and can no longer remain IC. It only benefits a select few people on the server such as civilians, because it is easier for them to put a report up and complain OOC, rather than deal with it IC. It affects more than 150/200 people (5 gangs with 40 members) on a day to day basis. How many civilians are there on the server on a daily basis? I doubt that the number it adds up to is anywhere close to the numbers criminals bring on the server, this rule benefits the minorities/newer players and not the people who can deal with it and the original players of the server. It must be adjusted/removed as it leads to nothing but ruleplay, the addition of it to the rulebook has allowed players to have an OOC get out of jail free card via the player reports, just because they don't want to get caught lacking due to their own foolishness. People will argue that it will just encourage more PvP on the server but you are kidding yourself if you think the PvP side of things is not a major thing on the server. If seniors think this then they can easily adjust the rule by adding in things such as "actual public places (motorways, parking lots, near PD)" or "known/clear criminals physically representing gang colours", etc. Unfortunately for us, this will become another PD vs Crim argument and another good suggestion will be brushed under the carpet. I doubt the seniors want to remove the rule but we can only hope...
  5. Not quite sure who orchestrated or who led the attack, we realised on radio that people were grouping so we came to this spot to provide backup and that’s what happened. I believe a few scouts on bikes called this place out that rival gang members brandishing heavy weaponry in a secluded area, but I’m not quite sure. Many of our people who survived the earlier encounter at sea lab were probably the forefront of this attack so had enough RP reason to do so.
  6. The vehicle was not moving at all, we were literally stationary at one point shouting demands at them. It is completely approptiate in this scenario to scream demands from the vehicle as this is not your typical "vehicle to person" demand, we're not in a sports car doing this, where it is difficult to see the gun due to GTA mechanics and it being a third person game, we are literally hanging out of a bulletproof van/truck with AK's and SMG's screaming demands, with the vehicle not moving, to people who are not moving. This image below shows us and our vehicle stationary (1km/h) whilst hanging out with heavy weaponry and screaming demands at people who are not moving: As I said above, this is not your typical "sports car pulls up and aims a weapon to a person standing" situation, we are hanging out of the car, clearly visible to people, screaming demands and aiming our heavy weaponry. In the video provided above you can literally here the person say "they're aiming AK's!", this shows that plausible demands were given and were acknowledged. The rule change/clarification does not link to this situation as Osborn clarified the rule due to sports cars abusing the rule and it being a third person game, we're hanging off a van aiming AK's and shouting demands, clearly visible to people as they ALL reacted. Another point to add is that we were not the only ones giving demands, others were swarming in from the hills, screaming demands and our intention was to pinch the people in the middle, and it worked. There was also another van which was involved, people on drags involved, people in sports cars involved, but because the big Rumpo turned up, we look like the main "culprits". NO shots were fired from the van UNTIL we got shot at. We also did not act upon our demands, as soon as they aimed guns at us it gave us DM rights and only then did we open fire. Plausible demands were given and were clearly acknowledged by the POV provided above. People reacted, some shot, some tried to evade, all were killed for it. One quick question, what is the reporting party reporting me for? He adds a sentence he wrote himself which is not even in the rulebook:
  7. Here is my POV: I did, in my POV above, at 0:22 we begin to tell Frank to get out and stop driving, he listened and we got out. Tell me what more I could've done as a passenger? I believe I showed as much fear for my life as I could have as a passenger, I cannot control what my driver does, I can only tell him what to do, and I did, and he listened, do you expect me to get out a moving car just to adhere to the rules? No, because that would be ruleplay and it would consequently put my life in danger and it would be NRP for me to jump out of a moving car. This car is bulletproof, I used the car to the best of my ability and when my life was in danger, I closed the door, I made only one attempt at shooting (0:13), and after that, I closed the doors when it was on my side to shoot to value my own life and waited till my driver stopped driving, what more could I have done as a passenger of a moving vehicle? I don't believe I broke any rules in this situation, you cannot question/punish a passenger of a vehicle as they have no control of where the driver goes, we can only instruct them. The report Malgotti linked to set precedent should be appealed (for the passenger who got punished) as the passenger has no say of where the driver goes too. I would also like to point the excessive amount of /b which happened during this active RP situation, it was a joke, especially ID 72. It put me off completely as to what I was doing and I am sure it did for others too. We get it, you wanted us to save POV, you didn't need to say it 100 times though...
  8. There was a suggestion made in the past where there were around 4 pages of the community agreeing with this but unfortunately it wasn't added.
  9. Currently you have to either frisk the injured/ask him to drag his guns to inventory/kill him to take weapons off people. make it so that it’s possible to take guns off injured without having to do this, I believe this is a quick fix as this was possible not long ago. this makes looting really difficult especially when you are outnumbered and need to get out fast and you can’t because of desync and the injured person not dying. This small change however will fix this.
  10. +1 If you will remove the radio talk then remove the /s too, basically the same thing.
  11. This is actually a good suggestion but how can you keep the NLR rule the same? This suggestion can't happen without scrapping the rule, one fight and the so called "war" would end in one fight, the new NLR rule and war rules literally contradict each other and are bad for criminal RP and is why no one has partaken in one since the first ever one which we were forced to partake in.
  12. Yes, cops on this server are taking snipers as their main weapon instead of SMG's/Carbines (due to the new gun inventory update) when going into close quarter fights which makes zero sense at all, this is not modern warfare and running around quick scoping people is just stupid, use the snipers properly or don't use them at all. Also remove the micro SMG as it makes no sense PD/SD using them, they are more a of street type of weapon and law enforcement in the real word certainly do not hang it out of their window and shoot it at the person evading. If we are pushing for more realism on this server which is clearly apparent, let's do it for PD as well.
  13. Fuz


    Actively RP'ing against this faction and time and time again they show that they always keep things IC, unlike other groups who have issues going OOC. Keep it up and you guys will be official in no time.
  14. -1. Current rule is fine. PD should never be easy to fight. Ramming one person ten times makes no RP sense also, get out of your car and fight or leave the situation, ramming should never be the answer.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.