Jump to content

punched

Moderator
  • Content Count

    195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

46 Excellent

3 Followers

About punched

  • Rank
    Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

529 profile views
  1. @WhopperWithSeeesYT Hello and thank you for makIng this appeal. As seen in the video provided in the forum report leading to your punishment, you ran over a player without a valid reason. Wanting to get away is not a valid reason to run them over just because they were standing in the way, especially when the player posed no threat to your life. Pending Senior Admin+ for conclusion.
  2. Hello. As was stated in the report, I don't believe it to be a realistic action to drive next to a car traveling at high speeds on the highway and yell at the people inside. They simply would not hear you unless you put your head into the window and yelled (that would be impossible to pull off anyway). Even then it would be semi masked by the wind. In a heavy rp server that simulates real life you cant expect to rob/stop everyone you see with little to no RP, some people will get away. Pending Senior Admin+ for conclusion.
  3. punched

    ID 22 - DM

    REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience and comments provided for this report. After reviewing the evidence provided, I've decided to apply the following punishments to the following players: [Patrick_Angel] [Non RP | Offense 1 + VDM | Offense #1] [Shouting orders at a vehicle traveling at high speeds on the highway, and for ramming a motorbike with an expensive vehicle. There was no valid reason to attack the player, as demands shouted from a fast moving vehicle are not a reason to attack another player.] [Tony_Park] [Player is already permanently banned] [James_Fielding] [DM | Offense #1] [Acting on orders shouted from or at moving vehicles is not allowed, and the request you made when you were stationary happened without any weapons aimed, and thus they were not under fearRP.] Not happy with the outcome? If you have received a punishment that you do not agree with, you are entitled to a fair punishment appeal that follows the guidelines and format provided. Otherwise, the conclusion of this report is final. Did the reporting party lose any items worth above 25.000 dollars as a result of this report? If you would like to request a refund, you may do so within our refund and transfer requests section, as long as your request follows the guidelines and format provided. Regards, Punched and @alexalex303
  4. REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience and comments provided for this report. After reviewing the evidence provided, I've decided to apply the following punishments to the following players: [Alex_Wexler] [Non RP | Offense #1 | Combat Logging] [Alex_Wexler (ID 91) will receive NonRP #1 for combat logging. We understand that some RP scenarios may be of lower quality and that may make you upset, however logging on purpose is never acceptable. He will not be receiving a fearRP punishment, as we feel that you both pulled weapons at the same time.] Not happy with the outcome? If you have received a punishment that you do not agree with, you are entitled to a fair punishment appeal that follows the guidelines and format provided. Otherwise, the conclusion of this report is final. Did the reporting party lose any items worth above 25.000 dollars as a result of this report? If you would like to request a refund, you may do so within our refund and transfer requests section, as long as your request follows the guidelines and format provided. Regards, Punched and @alexalex303
  5. REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience and comments provided for this report. After reviewing the evidence provided, I've decided to apply the following punishments to the following players: [Mason_Clark] [Mason Clark ID 25 will receive a verbal warning for the ram and for the fact that he did not interact with the player at all apart from the honk. If it was IC, we expect a reason to be provided. If it was OOC, we expect you to state that it was an accident in /b.] Not happy with the outcome? If you have received a punishment that you do not agree with, you are entitled to a fair punishment appeal that follows the guidelines and format provided. Otherwise, the conclusion of this report is final. Did the reporting party lose any items worth above 25.000 dollars as a result of this report? If you would like to request a refund, you may do so within our refund and transfer requests section, as long as your request follows the guidelines and format provided. Regards, Punched and @alexalex303
  6. Hello. A taser is not a weapon that puts your life in direct danger and getting hit by one does not kill you. As you switched to the shotgun he made a break for the car while he wasn't under fear rp since you did not aim the shotgun, there were also no demands made when you got the weapon out. As stated in the conclusion of the report leading to your punishment, shooting the car would have been fine but not shooting Liam. I'm going to recommend the punishment stay in place. Pending Senior Admin+ for conclusion.
  7. Hello. In the encounter shown in the video there were faults on both sides. The sports car should not have rammed you, and you should not have shot at another car that did not hit you in any way. Considering this is your second DM punishment and the last one was 2 months ago, I wouldn't be against reducing the time on this ban. Pending Senior Admin+ for conclusion.
  8. punched

    DM/MG 125

    Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  9. Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  10. punched

    DM

    Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  11. punched

    ID 50 DM

    Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  12. Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  13. punched

    ID 47 VDM

    Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  14. Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
  15. Conclusion and Response Approved. Sincerely, Punched
×
×
  • Create New...