Kris

PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Michael_Crockett [ID 100] - Deathmatch #1 - The reported party rammed the reporting party twice, with a bike. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Kris

PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Aberama_Joyce - Verbal Warning - I will be issuing a verbal warning to you as you have been very sincere in your response and you seem to know what you did was wrong and your intentions don't seem malicious to me. I feel that educating you on the issue is a better approach to this situation. The problem with the incident in question is that you waited until you were under gunpoint and demands were given, which you then responded with driving away, while chop shopping the bike. It would have been different if you saw them come up to you and drive off before they were able to hold you under gunpoint, which might have been okay, considering this situation. I can not answer for every other situation, as the context will vary from situation to situation. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Kris

PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Hans_Berg [ID 24] - Non-Roleplay #5 (Combat Logging) - I will only be issuing the punishment for Combat Logging. The reported party was not under fear roleplay as the reported party started to run away before you had the chance to aim your weapon and issue a demand. I feel like his actions and him getting shot would be more as in-character consequence than a rule break. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Kris

PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): The issue seems to be caused by desync and I do not believe a server rule was violated. Regarding the reported party running away after the /do - I see this as a justified action. The reported party resisted your action by running away. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Kris

Given another 24 hours to respond.

Given another 24 hours to respond.

Given another 24 hours to respond.

Given another 24 hours to respond.

PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): First of all, I would like to thank you all for your patience while the report was under review. After looking through the incident with the given context and evidence of it, I have come to the following conclusion and final verdict on the report: The reported party did not intend on using the vehicle to ram into you. This happened because of desync as seen in the image below. The vehicle the reported party was in did not acknowledge you crashed into it. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Kris

PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Aberama_Joyce [ID 37] - Please explain your side of the story. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Kris

Thank you for coming back to me. @Felix_Wolf Please read what kenichis put above, and keep in mind that you should focus on the roleplay at hand and make an attempt to keep IC, IC and not take it OOC. If you are not sure who is roleplaying with you, please make an attempt to figure it out who the roleplay is directed at. No action taken. Player report archived.

PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Tyrese_Campbell [ID 77] - Deathmatch #1 Jamal_Demond [ID 65] - Deathmatch #2 First of all, I would like to thank you all for your patience while the report was under review. After looking through the incident with the given context and evidence of it, I have come to the following conclusion and final verdict on the report: The reporting party is seen driving to the eastern drug lab in the Blaine County area, and stumbled upon four cars and one bike, in total, six players, that is headed back into the Sandy Shores area, towards Paul's farm. The reporting party is then seen following the reported party, in specific, ID 126 for a total of 15 seconds as ID 126 pulled over. The reporting party then carries on driving and starts tailing ID 8. ID 150 and 65 is seen here trying to do what seems like a potential ram, trying to block the reporting party's path. Reporting party continues to follow ID 8 however. Both the reporting party and ID 8 proceed to drive south on the Senora Freeway before ID 8 takes a weird turn to the left, crashing into the reporting party's vehicle. The reporting party and ID 8 carries on driving, this time it is north on the Senora Freeway, back towards the general area of Paul's farm. After a while, ID 150 and 65 is seen yet again, trying to block the reporting party's path, following ID 8. The reporting party carries on following ID 8. ID 126 also rams into the reporting party's vehicle a few seconds later. Moving on, the reporting party is still following ID 8 until ID 77 who has not been involved or seen in these two minutes the events was going on, and is seen to slow down when seeing the reporting party and picks up speed again after the reporting party has been seen by ID 77 and ID 77 proceeds to drive straight into the reporting party's driving trajectory, thus making the reporting party crash into ID 77's car as a result. This did not stall the reporting party's engine. The reporting party then carries on following ID 8. One minute passes after these events and ID 77 does the same as last time, and drives straight ahead into the reporting party's driving trajectory, this time, stalling the reporting party's engine. ID 126 comes up and rams the reporting party's vehicle and with the reporting party inside. ID 77 and 126 then proceeds to get out of their vehicles with weapons, to note, ID 77's VOIP here is inaudible. The reporting party at this time gets out of their vehicle and put their hands up and just a mere second after, ID 65 rams into the reporting party and the reporting party's vehicle, thus injuring the reporting party in the process. All of the rams that were taken place throughout the few minutes all of this went down, with the reporting party first following you all to the reporting party's death, I can not hear a single demand given, or any attempt to resolve it in a way that would not be considered a direct attack on the reporting party. I believe from the rams that ID 65 did prior to the final ram where they kill the reporting party, that ID 65's intent is very clear and that lag is not a factor that caused this and the ram was done with intent, whether or not it killed the reporting party is not of a concern, as it would still be an attack on their property or person. Going through the examples of valid reasons to attack another player under our Deathmatch rule, the reporting party did not attempt to arrest or hurt any of the reporting parties during this, or their property. The reporting party did not report the reported party to the police for a serious crime, and the reporting party was not given any demands to be in compliance with, or tried to escape or call backup that the reported party could have seen. It would have been okay for the reported party to carry on with all of this, if demands were given and the reporting party was not in compliance, but this did not happen. I do not see a proper roleplay reason to attack the reporting party. I would also like to take this time and reiterate what has previously been stated on our latest community update, "We still see it as Non-Roleplay and a non-plausible demand to give a moving car demands through VOIP. Stopping a moving car as a criminal roleplayer is never going to be as easy as it is for the police, it's just simply how it is - it's a bad comparison, as for the latter, it's their duty to do just that, and they have the tools to be able to give demands whilst driving (sirens & megaphone). You have to find a way to give a realistic demand whilst also not acting as if the highway is the wild west, perhaps stake the person out and wait until they're stopped?". With all of this in mind, I am issuing ID 77 and ID 65 their respective punishments for Deathmatch. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Kris

@kenichis - Did this situation with Felix Wolf cause any severe losses or was it abused for benefit? If so, in what way?

PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Michael_Crockett [ID 100] - Please explain your side of the story. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Kris

Pending review from myself.