Jump to content

jason

Administrator
  • Posts

    2,159
  • Joined

Reputation

530 Excellent

About jason

  • Rank
    Contributor
    Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

4,670 profile views
  1. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: @Harley - Harley_Pavlovich (155) - Please gather your own evidence and response as well as evidence and responses from your allies involved in this situation. Once that is done, please organize all responses and evidence into one post with separated sections for each person's reply. If certain people choose not to reply or fail to reply within the allotted 48 hours, please note that down in your post rather than omitting them from your reply. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 48 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, jason
  2. This ban was issued on behalf of @Dqniel and will be pending him.
  3. Typed RP is used to display truthful and accurate statements about the RP situation and the environment around you. You can SAY you won't resist and still resist, so RPing it is what actually determines whether or not you do resist. Same goes for medics. You can say one thing while another is what's actually happening. Someone IRL might say "I think I broke my arm" when in reality, they might just have a dislocated joint or something of the sort.
  4. sign my profile!!

  5. PENDING REVIEW ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― Hi there! Thank you for submitting this player report. This report will now be pending review by myself. During this time, we ask that you please refrain from any back-and-forth in this report between anyone involved. Regards, jason
  6. My apologies for the wait. Caesar was on LOA from the 30th until today and this report is one that requires a very detailed look at it.
  7. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Briar_Holland (56) - Gross RP | Continuing gross roleplay without prior consent and after being asked to stop. The following punishment is being issued to you today due to the fact that, after getting injured and arranging for a medic to come on scene to provide treatment, you began gross roleplay multiple different times to the player that was attempting to treat you. After being informed via OOC chat that it was unwanted and you were not given consent, you still continued this line of roleplay. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, jason & aleks
  8. PENDING REVIEW ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― Hi there! Thank you for submitting this player report. This report will now be pending review by myself and @aleks. During this time, we ask that you please refrain from any back-and-forth in this report between anyone involved. Regards, jason & aleks
  9. PENDING REVIEW ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― Hi there! Thank you for submitting this player report. This report will now be pending review by myself and @CaesarSeizure. During this time, we ask that you please refrain from any back-and-forth in this report between anyone involved. Regards, jason & Caesar
  10. Player has been banned for this situation after it was handled in-game. Locked & archived.
  11. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Eran_Collins (140) - NonRP | Breach of the NonRP public robbery rules. Donny_Smith (13) - NonRP | Breach of the NonRP public robbery rules. Ben_Jonsey (89) - NonRP | Breach of the NonRP public robbery rules. Jack_Montague (219) - NonRP | Breach of the NonRP public robbery rules. ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― Going through the provided evidence and the players' statements, we can see the reported players entering the store and conducting a robbery. Ben_Jonsey was giving the reporting player demands while Donny_Smith was trying to rob her. During this time, Eran_Collins was lock-picking her car and Jack_Montague was scouting the area, he can be seen entering and exiting the store. It goes without saying that this robbery was clearly against our Player Theft rules. You all robbed/participated in a robbery in a public area, in this situation, Vespucci General Store. Our rules regarding the player robberies clearly state, "Robberies should be conducted in a realistic manner with reasonable in-character motive using secluded areas." A general store is not considered a 'secluded place' nor it makes any sense for 4 players with knives and masks to rob someone there. Also, Jack_Montague mentioned that he was just 'running outside', but that doesn't mean you were not involved in this. You were a part of the group that was actively robbing someone. The rule about player theft is all about drawing a large amount of attention to a place where it makes no sense to do so, and you all succeeded in doing so by being there and running around masked with knives in your hands. In regards to the meta-gaming claim, there's no evidence to support that. If the player was 'hot-micing', that doesn't mean they're meta-gaming, therefore we won't issue any punishments for that. Also, regarding the DM claim, the provided evidence is not conclusive and there are a lot of factors that need to be considered before coming to a conclusion, so we won't be issuing any DM punishments. ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, jason & Harveyyy
  12. REPORT DENIED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After our deliberations, we’ve concluded that this report will be denied for the following reason(s): As stated by Roderick, 3.6 was merely added as a mistake and will not be considered metagaming. Your application was denied for NUMEROUS other reasons and this mistake had no effect on the outcome of the application. The rest of the claims are either IC or subjective and are not rulebreaks. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, jason & Yputi
  13. cat1.jpg.29e89a73b2d65d001c9b1af568b10b76.jpg
    Miss you xx

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.