-
Posts
395 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
NotMattch last won the day on June 29
NotMattch had the most liked content!
Reputation
68 ExcellentAbout NotMattch
- Currently Viewing Forum: Player Reports
-
Rank
Community Regular
Recent Profile Visitors
2,863 profile views
-
REFUND PENDING ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ After reviewing the request and evidence attached to it, I have decided that you cannot receive a refund at this time for the following reason(s): @martinkrupka - You cannot file a refund request on behalf of another player. This will only be dealt with for the losses you yourself incurred. Additionally, provide evidence of the exact items and fines that you are asking for a refund of as the evidence provided does not show any of this. @abdi salam / Miles - If you have any video showing the visual bug you had on your side that led to the arrest, please provide it Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch
-
NotMattch started following Improving LSEMS Roleplay / Server Attitude towards Medical Roleplay , Refund request Martin Krupka + Octavio Steinberg - 1. Assault rifle 2. 0.50 3. heavy armour 4. 250 plants + crate 5. impound money 6. fines , There should be a chance that the K9 wouldn't smell the guns inside the vehicle. and 1 other
-
REFUND PENDING REVIEW ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Thank you for taking the time to submit this refund request. It is now under review. During this time, please refrain from making duplicate refund requests or adding unnecessary replies unless asked for further information. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch
-
PENDING RESPONSE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [ @QueenOfMisfit ] - Dylan_Chapple (ID 8 ) - Please provide any video footage of the situation that you may have If the requested player(s) do not respond within 48 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Please refrain from any back-and-forth and respond to your inquiry only. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch
-
There were PD/SD policies implemented regarding this, from my understanding, when they arrive and do the initial sniff around the vehicle RP, they then dice the occupants to see if the sniff is successful in finding anything. If the dice succeed, then they can continue with the RP of doing the sniffing to then determine where it goes, what was found etc. (i.e., you don't need to dice every item) If the dice fail, then nothing is found, and they proceed as if it were a negative result (i.e., they can't re-dice if you have multiple items; if it fails, the doggo finds nothing)
-
PENDING RESPONSE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [ @Auxlift ] - Ash_Peters (ID 51) - Please explain your reasoning and rationale for opening fire at the reporting party as shown in the provided evidence. Additionally, please explain the contact between your vehicle and the reporting parties kamacho including what your intentions were and what the outcome you were aiming to achieve was. Finally please provide any video evidence of the situation that you may have. [ @atw3ll ] - William_Club (ID 71) - Please provide the full unedited video to myself. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 48 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Please refrain from any back-and-forth and respond to your inquiry only. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch
-
PENDING REVIEW ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Thank you for taking the time to submit this report. It is now under review. During this time, we ask that everyone involved refrain from any back-and-forth discussions. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch
-
Improving LSEMS Roleplay / Server Attitude towards Medical Roleplay
NotMattch replied to lLizzyl's topic in Game Suggestions
Seeing as there was contention around the "when can PD/SD stabilize" issue: PD/SD have access to the /stabilize command if there are 2 EMS or fewer on shift. The reason it was set to 2 was due to the issue of supervisors and divisions in the past going on duty to do administrative tasks, and not responding to calls and additonally the assumption that if only 1 medic is on duty, the majority of the time they'd be unable to respond. At the end of the day, /stabilize is there to allow medical RP to be completed. Just because you are /stabilized does not mean you are treated, hence why medics are only required to *know* the injury before running the command, not *treat* the injury before running the command. To the actual suggestion, I've said for years and will continue to say, EMS needs proper script support. Not the same script we've had since 2017 that relies on a single command and the goodwill of the community. To literally quote what I wrote elsewhere: On top of the above, the way the server is as it stands encourages you not to interact with medics. Interacting with a medic is a "time waste", you have to wait for them to arrive, god forbid you have to actually do some RP and then get taken to EMS and dropped off. Alternatively, you get your friend to throw you in a trunk, drive you to EMS and drop you off before they take you back, all done before EMS would actually arrive. Or, if you know where they are, you can just be taken to a black market doctor and healed without even needing the trip to EMS if you're close to one, which is even faster! Why interact with EMS when I can pay for an instant heal or for a Heal-over-time effect in a fraction of the time? -
PENDING RESPONSE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [ @Kevin Biker ] - Kevin_Biker (ID 6) - Please re-upload the evidence linked in the initial report, as the original video has since been deleted. Additionally, if possible, please provide a longer and unedited POV showing the full situation, including the lead-up, the casino interaction, the chase, the beginning of the shootout, and the full fight/aftermath. Please also answer the following question(s): Please explain why the original evidence linked in your report was deleted. From your perspective, what escalation existed before the shootout began? Were any demands given before shots were fired? If so, who gave them, when were they given, and to whom? Please explain why you opened fire at Luca_Marcello (ID 45). [ @Auxlift ] - Ash_Peters (ID 17) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): From your perspective, what escalation existed before the shootout began? Were any demands given before shots were fired? If so, who gave them, when were they given, and to whom? Please explain what information or observations led to your involvement in the shootout. [ @Mortem ] - Ramiz_Bashkimi (ID 31) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): From your perspective, what escalation existed before the shootout began? Were any demands given before shots were fired? If so, who gave them, when were they given, and to whom? [ @Night2255 ] - Jay_Bruise (ID 9) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): Please explain your interaction with the Locos member(s) before the chase began, including whether you were attempting to speak with them, scout them, or follow them for another reason. From your perspective, what escalation existed before the vehicle contact and later shootout? Please explain the vehicle contact involving your FMJ and the Kamacho during the chase, including what you were attempting to do at the time. Were any demands given before shots were fired? If so, who gave them, when were they given, and to whom? Please explain what information or observations led to your involvement in the shootout. [ @pooria ] - Travis_Reggal (ID 47) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): What was your role in the situation before and during the shootout? From your perspective, what escalation existed before the shootout began? Were any demands given before shots were fired? If so, who gave them, when were they given, and to whom? Please explain what information or observations led to your involvement in the shootout. [ @nobrain ] - Gregor_Castillo (ID 12) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): Please explain what you were doing before and during the shootout, including whether you were involved in any pre-established Locos/Rooks activity. What was your role in the Locos/Rooks activity before the chase/fight reached the area? Were you part of a pre-established Locos/Rooks activity before the casino/chase situation began? Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. What information did you have before becoming involved in the shootout, and how did that information lead to your involvement? [Notified In-Game] - Gus_White (ID 59) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): Please clarify your role before the shootout began, including what you observed and what information you relayed over radio. Were you part of a pre-established Locos/Rooks activity before the casino/chase situation began? Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. What information did you have before becoming involved in the shootout, and how did that information lead to your involvement? [ @YuSoHelpful ] - Luca_Marcello (ID 45) - You have already provided a response; however, we require further clarification and any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): Please explain your perspective on the initial interaction with ID 9, the chase, the vehicle contact, and the beginning of the shootout. You stated that Locos and Rooks were holding/cooking together and that there were scouts. Please clarify when this joint activity began and who was involved. You stated that you drove back toward the area where you had been holding. Please clarify where you went after the casino-related radio call and where you were attempting to go while being chased. Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. You stated that a radio call was made regarding one of your members being robbed at casino. Please clarify who made that call, what was said, who received that information, and what action was taken as a result. You stated that you tried to speak to ID 9 multiple times. Please clarify what was said, when this occurred, and whether you have any evidence of this. Please explain what information or observations led to your involvement in the shootout after the vehicle contact occurred. Could you provide additional clarification regarding the interaction between your vehicle and the FMJ, including how the contact occurred from your perspective? [ @pablomarian ] - Pablo_Marian - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): What was your role in the Locos/Rooks activity before the chase/fight reached the area? Were you part of a pre-established Locos/Rooks activity before the casino/chase situation began? Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. What information did you have before becoming involved in the shootout, and how did that information lead to your involvement? [ @Dexter Nevermore ] - Jackson_Jacobs (ID 19) - You have already provided a response; however, we require further clarification and any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): Please explain your movements from the store/casino interaction through to your later involvement in the shootout. In your forum response, you stated that after being robbed at casino, you used your Locos radio to notify others that you had been robbed. Please explain which radio/frequency this was, who was present on that frequency, and what exactly was said. Was that communication intended only as an information update, or were you requesting assistance? You stated that you were not part of the lab hold at that point in time. Please clarify whether you later became part of the Locos/Rooks activity, and if so, when and why. Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. What information did you have before becoming involved in the shootout, and how did that information lead to your involvement? [ @itsJonathan ] - Jonathan_Goffston (ID 81) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): What was your role in the Rooks/Locos activity before the chase/fight reached the area? Were you part of a pre-established Rooks/Locos activity before the casino/chase situation began? Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. Was your involvement already part of the Rooks/Locos activity, or did it begin after receiving information about OTF/the chase? Please include what information led to your involvement in the situation. [Notified In-Game] - Freddy_Busac (ID 102) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): What was your role in the Rooks/Locos activity before the chase/fight reached the area? Were you part of a pre-established Rooks/Locos activity before the casino/chase situation began? Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. Was your involvement already part of the Rooks/Locos activity, or did it begin after receiving information about OTF/the chase? Please include what information led to your involvement in the shootout. [Notified In-Game] - Ali_Valentine - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any unedited evidence that you may have. Please also answer the following question(s): What was your role in the Rooks/Locos activity before the chase/fight reached the area? Were you part of a pre-established Rooks/Locos activity before the casino/chase situation began? Please explain your use or knowledge of any joint frequency around the time of the situation, including who provided it, who was expected to be on it, and what it was being used for. Was your involvement already part of the Rooks/Locos activity, or did it begin after receiving information about OTF/the chase? Please include what information led to your involvement in the shootout. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 48 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Please refrain from any back-and-forth and respond to your inquiry only. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch & Senior Support SynnSavior
-
PENDING REVIEW ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Thank you for taking the time to submit this report. It is now under review. I appreciate it has been a while since it was posted, whilst we worked through some things in the background and thank you for your continued patience. During this time, we ask that everyone involved refrain from any back-and-forth discussions. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch
-
I see this thread is already turning into a "PD bad wah" response as evidenced by statements such as: So lets nip this in the bud immediately, I specfically want to call out the following statement as well: This thread is full of incorrect assumptions. Anyone who has played for the length of time I have knows full well that this has absolutely nothing to do with LEO "adopting" a practice or "forcing rp and powergaming because they want to jail them". This has been a long-standing RP that has had staff approval since 2017. In fact, history lesson time, before around 2020, PD & MD didn't even need to know your injuries before using stabilize and were actually permitted to arrive on scene, stabilize everyone injured and then go back around and actually treat the injuries. This was changed around 2020, at a scene I was, funnily enough, actually leading the response to on the MD side, when a large gang fight erupted at Triad HQ and there was an overwhelming amount of injuries from both sides. The ruling was made during this scene and became set into precedent thereafter that MD and LEO need to at a minimum know the injuries before running the stabilize command to allow others the chance of bleeding out. We also used to permit DeathRP with staff approval, where if someone was actually RPing decent enough, with the agreement of those on scene and the agreement of the staff overseeing the person, they could RP their death based on their injuries. I myself used this system and had it approved several times. This was eventually removed, for reasons I'm not aware of, as I wasn't staff at the time. The long-standing problem of the past few years is that the majority of the time you turn up to treat injuries, you get 0 RP response. You turn up, start medical RP either from an MD or LEO perspective and get the absolute bare minimum of "/do GSW" because the guy that got shot is salty that they died. This isn't exclusively a Crim or LEO issue; I've had this from both sides. MD provides medical RP to just get a string of "/do yes" "/do able", not RP at all because they just don't care to engage with it and are super salty now that they aren't going to die. This also assumes the moment you arrive to actually do something, you didn't immediately get hit with "/pm wtf bro y u stabilize me" or "/do GSW to head" or "/do would be dead". Anyways, history lesson aside, I do agree to an extent with the suggestion but not in the current setup of the server at all. As stated above, text-based RP and relying on the other party to be fair just doesn't work, as correctly stated above, Crims want to die, LEOs want to save. There's an inherent conflict of interest here where one side has to be willing to "lose", which we all know isn't going to happen. What I would like to see on the wishlist of items is exactly what you guys said above. A scripted medical system. Look at other servers and platforms and the medical systems they provide, where injuries are scripted based on the damage taken, how the damage was taken and where the damage was taken. They then have to treat the injuries correctly with the right tools and equipment, i.e., blood loss from a GSW has to be resolved with a transfusion, the wound itself has to be stabilized with the correct amount of bandaging or even resolved by going through surgery where it's stitched up, etc. Some injuries require monitoring as they aren't just fixed and you walk out based on how severe they are and do have some after effects. One server I'm aware of has about 25 different medical items that all perform various functions. Now I'm not saying we need 25 different items, but this is an example of how in-depth you can make the system. Obviously, it can be adjusted to fit the server better. Additionally, this actually gives MD some much-needed love. MD hasn't changed at all (excluding vehicles, MLO) since I joined back in 2019, it's been the exact same system forever. If anyone wants to see a really in-depth system, go look up the Ace3 medical system in Arma 3
-
[Context Menu] keybind toggle between E/Alt or custom key
NotMattch replied to Valen Bell's topic in Game Suggestions
Dont see a way to rebind this in the gta rebind, so +1 from me