Jump to content

Chapman

Moderator
  • Content Count

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

33 Excellent

5 Followers

About Chapman

Recent Profile Visitors

994 profile views
  1. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Michael_Nickson [ID 99] - Non-RP Warning (Player Theft) - In the evidence provided by the reporting party, reported player Michael_Nickson is seen moving a New Player to a secluded area where the reported player then initiates a roleplay scenario in which he attempts to hold up and rob the reporting party, by doing so, he is in violation of rule 15 (Player Theft, Prison Break, and Kidnapping) of the Eclipse Roleplay server rules - whilst there is no way to determine what the justification was to initiate this robbery beyond a written response stating that the reporting party was willing to steal vehicles, ultimately, it is still a violation of the rule regardless of the intentions of the New Player. As the rule explicitly states, you cannot steal from players with a New Player tag unless they have deliberately taken part in an active crime scene. The scenario in this report is not an active crime scene. Caleb_Barker [ID 124] - Verbal Warning - Please refrain from continuously locking and unlocking your vehicle whilst under gunpoint. It does not show appropriate care and concern to preserve your character's safety and life, but more appropriate care to not have your property stolen over preserving your character's life. This does not show adequate fear being roleplayed, which we request you do in the future. As for the initial claim of deathmatching, we have made the decision to not rule this as a violation of the deathmatching rule based on several factors; the constant (un)locking of the motorcycle by the reporting party whilst at gunpoint, as well as the movement (constant turning whilst on knees) seen in the video which both could have different on the reported player's end and also opens up the possibility of an attempt to get on the motorcycle by the reporting party whilst in the /down animation based on testing done in-game following a review of the evidence. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
  2. Pending review by @Pazzand myself. Please be patient while this report is being reviewed.
  3. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): Evidence from a situation must not be older than 48 hours. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman
  4. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Kane_Mysterio [ID 71] - Deathmatching - In the video evidence that was provided by both the reporting party and reported party no demands are seen or heard, regardless of who's point of view it was. The only mentions of demands in the video evidence that was provided was by one of the individuals being shot at stating "do not give demands", and then later on the radio by an individual of the group that was with the reported party stating "demands were given, you can shoot" - however, as mentioned previously, no demands were witnessed in any of the evidence provided by both parties. It is your responsibility and yours only to reaffirm the validity of these demands and whether or not they were actually given before you make the decision for yourself to attack and harm another player. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
  5. Unless you are asked by a staff member to provide a statement, do not respond to this report any further while we are reviewing it.
  6. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Kane Mysterio [ID 71] - @KaneMyst Please provide any evidence you have relating to this situation and if possible all the involved parties who issued demands. Martin Bruise - @Kurdo251 Please provide any further evidence you have relating to this situation. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
  7. Pending review, please be patient while this is reviewed.
  8. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Jacob_Leoni [ID 39] - Warning regarding the stealing of vehicles while they are being refueled - Upon further review of the evidence provided and the context in which the vehicle theft occurred with other members of the staff team, we have come to the conclusion that the act of stealing a vehicle whilst it is being refueled is non-roleplay. The only reason the vehicle is unlocked is because of the script requiring it to be, realistically there would also still be a hose and fuel nuzzle from the gas pump "connected" to the fuel filler inlet of the vehicle, and lastly, it allows no chance for the other player to respond whatsoever. Please avoid doing so in the future, as it will lead to a full punishment rather than a warning. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
  9. Pending review by myself and @Pazz, please be patient while this is reviewed.
  10. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Michael_Hemsworth [ID 140] - OOC Behavior/Disrupting Server Operations - The evidence provided by the reporting party in the form of screenshots show player and reported party Michael_Hemsworth insulting the reporting party through in-game private messages. This behavior is completely unacceptable in this community and will not be tolerated. We suggest that the reporting party read over the "Disrupting Server Operations and Knowledge of Rulebreaches" of our server rules, more specifically, the point made in regard to players of this server needing to be a positive member of this community, and with that, needing to always remain respectful with everyone at all times. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
  11. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Larry_Robs [ID 48] - Vehicle Deathmatching - To preface, we would like to clarify that, due to the lack of response from the reported party, this conclusion has been based on the initial video evidence provided by the reporting and what was found out throughout the brief investigation into the matter. In the video provided by the reporting party, Larry_Robs was seen to be utilizing his vehicle as a weapon in an attempt to hit a player not once, but multiple times over the course of a brief period of time. Despite already directly violating the deathmatching rule in regard to the usage of vehicles as a weapon by attempting to use the vehicle as a weapon more than once after a failed attempt, with what appears to be a lack of proper reasoning and motive to begin with, player Larry_Lobs used the vehicle to successfully hit Benjamin_Young once directly, and once more when reversing the vehicle, injuring the aforementioned player. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
  12. Pending review, please be patient while this report is under review.
  13. Pending review, please be patient while this report is being reviewed.
  14. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Alex_Jin [ID 201] - Deathmatching - To preface, we would like to clarify that due to the lack of response from the reported party, this conclusion has been based on the evidence provided by the reporting party and what was found throughout the brief investigation into the matter. Alex_Jin, in the video provided as evidence by the reporting party, is found to be and is seen in a clear breach of our deathmatching rule, as there was no proper in-character interaction prior to the killing of the reporting party, and based on the evidence presented, there was no in-character motive present either. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Chapman & Pazz
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.