Riderz

-1 Due to the current set of the internal rules applying to them it would be easily abused. An the old saying going "If it can be used, it will be abused".

+1

+1

+1 I think adding functionality to wars would be a real perk to the server

-1 Humiliation is needed

Looks stunning! Can't wait to see the RP to come

Good interactions with them with fairly detailed rp, keep it up!

A) Thats life, people get hit by a straight round all the time. B) What can you do outside of robbing them/chopping their vehicles.

I would say +1 to muskets but not shotguns

Sure, can you name a few? As it complies to the rules of the server with no OOC arrangement

100% agreed

+1

+1 This brings the standard of RP such a ridicules low standard, thus must be fixed I also think this should be factored into backup calls etc

Wars: At the moment the F4 function of the "WAR" option, which is the ability to declaring hostile action against an opposing gang based on it's rp engagements is at the moment is virtually useless. Though in this function their is no additional benefit to doing as due to the "Deathmatching" regulations imposed via the rules the RP that lead to the wars are almost fairly useless in the fact the best you can hope for is a "Tactical Robbery". Which in these cases you hope either A) They break fear rp as that gives you the ground to engage or B) Are armed prior to the engagement. This poses a huge flaw when it comes to Criminal RP as the best response we can do to gangs wishing to fight us is chain rob them either at labs, houses or on the streets. As we have seen in the past, gang wars are filled with Deathmatch reports and ban's due to the such strict regulations imposed on them. Adding functionality to this option will both expand criminal rp and reduce the sheer reports made as it relates to these "wars". I think what we should do as a collective is decided how we can best expand these regulations when it comes to interactions with gangs, hopefully replacing the concept of "Tactical robberies" with perhaps drive bys and other IC retaliations as it relates to the rp Once system used in SAMP was the concept of "/rep" which would place a text above the players head stating their gang affiliation marking the the declared gang an easy indicator the person to whom they are at war with preventing civilian casualties. Some may concerned that function "meta" but the RP behind it would be that you are clear as day representing that gangs colors marking your a member. Do you have anything to say about this or how to improve the system? Post your ideas bellow!

+1

+1

Loving some of the suggestion posted, the main point of this thread is to expand how these operations are conducted and benefit both sides, and at least addressing the issue.

Not needed

+`

+1 For Additional Weapons because it adds dynamic to both rp and gun fights held within

In my experience most don't intend on breaking rules, usually the determinant factor being adrenaline and they simply make a mistake or was not sure on the rule itself. It happens, and I've talk to countless parties were that just be the case. You may presume all that you want regarding the matter but educating and understand will project players towards better understandment then just reporting in spite and being equally as rigid as those you speak of.

I've noticed reports being made at a ridicules volume. I think to deter from complaints that don't (a) cause finical loss that would be considered "substantial" or otherwise effect the outcome of a particular roleplay, I think the parties should attempt to speak with one another regarding the violation and seek to find a solution that way, attaching any attempt made towards outreaching the player. I feel this would benefit some of these situations and possible lighten the load when it comes to player complaints. If both parties can not find a mid-ground upon speaking to one another then a forum complaint can be made or if the party breaking the rules just refuses to accept any form of communication. The outreach attempt should be noted via the forum complaint that an effort was made. If you have any suggestion when it comes to forum complaint utilization please post it here and let's get ideas flowing!

The law you stated is meant to restrict "few" business from becoming oligopoly cartels. Given the only barrier of entry is the scripted amount available this law would be applicable in that stance as their is no "barrier" from others opening a gun store other then scripting. An the current prices are based on the demand/supply of pistols supplied.

I've noticed the same issue quite a few times

+1