Freclan

Looking at the numbers for this it's near insane, I'm not sure how you're calculating the hours whether it's just ingame but if we were to go off of the 168 hours in a week it's 8400 per car for insurance for the cheapest option. For someone like me who has multiple cars I really don't want to pay upwards of 50 grand a week to use them. If this is in-game hours times the amount by 4. -1

Hello! Today I'm suggesting that certain cars that have the option to have multiple roof choices should be able to have them permanently selected in the modview at mechanics. Cars like the chino custom or the corquette have different roofs that appear to be chosen at complete random and I'd like to be able to choose the roof for the car I'm driving, in the case of the chino I think it looks better without. I'm fairly certain you can do this in GTA:O so I hope it's easy to implement on here. Attached are some pictures of the chino customs roof to give an idea of what I'm talking about. The only way to get the car to not have the roof is to take it in and out of your garage till the roof is down. I'm unsure if this has been suggested before but if it has the my apologies.

Maybe like a red light on top of the car?

New players almost always get a reduced sentence no matter what crime they've commited, if they stole a car instead of getting the full GTA charge it's usually attempted.

Makes sense, not sure why they haven't added this

You need permission from MD and a certificate to prove it to have a mask for a medical reason

Just seems unnessecary when the real fix could be some proper development for weazel

-1 just gonna have a load of trolls ads

Make a report if you think admins are abusing power instead of bashing entire factions on the forums. Immature behaviour.

no thanks

This might be the worst suggestion yet

There's a certain number of vehicles LSPD are authorised to PIT with our cruisers, your car being one of them. If the car is a lot heavier than our regular cruisers we have the option of deploying a brickade or kamacho. The video linked here mostly displays a PIT with a lot of desync. Have you ever actually tried to PIT a car while on high ping? Also our cruisers aren't "tiny little cruisers" they are fairly armoured and designed to conduct these types of maneuvers.

Been suggested a ton of times, nothing new has been added in this thread

as a cop I'd be in support of this, 3 hours is still a long time for a punishment. The increased time for a murder charge is a good idea. I've come to recognise over the last few months that PD needs crim RP in order to be interesting

You're completely correct, we do have a lethal force matrix. The criminal doesn't know if he's dealing with a corrupt cop, he doesn't know if the cop has been given orders to shoot if he makes a sudden movement. I think it should stay as it is.

Well if the fear rp rule changes everyone would run when PD point a gun, leaving us the only option to taze people. Not gonna be very fun if I'm honest

Pretty much, that's how the fear rp rule works. You don't know if the cop isn't going to shoot you, you can only assume

I'd be in support of this if it means I'd no longer have to type out the /me for taking a weapon out. I don't use binds so currently typing out the RP for removing a shotgun from the /pw is roughly 5-10 seconds

There's already a law against it, this is an outdated suggestion.

They were most likely not recommending it because a supervisor had just dealt with the situation. I don't believe for a second they would be not recommending using IA at all.

Park in the parking lot and it won't be a problem

+1 this shit is lazy and annoying

DeathRP is no longer given by PD or SD. I agree PD should be worried when driving a single cruiser into a known gang HQ, I believe this falls under the FearRP rule. PD losing something is now just a comment that's beating a dead horse, it's been said PD won't lose anything and it should be left at that. Perma bans should stay but for very harsh punishments. I agree that temp bans should be in place for a majority of punishments. Other than that +1 for the rest.

-1 Salaries are just fine in my opinion. The fact that weazel doesn't have enough employees is more to do with how they're hiring. The tax system is the system that should be fixed, I don't have a whole lot but I'm in the top tax bracket. It's disheartening to get $100,000 salary and only have $65,000.