Jump to content

kitkatkait

Administrator
  • Posts

    915
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

340 Excellent

About kitkatkait

  • Rank
    Contributor
    Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

2,587 profile views
  1. Can you please explain the death matching rule? Why did you think it was a good idea to ram someone while you were driving a bike? Can you explain why this is wrong?
  2. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Rondo_Montana (34) - NonRP FearRP - You pulled a weapon and began firing while not listening to valid demands whilst under gunpoint. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Administrator Kat
  3. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Ramsey_Kanoun (148) - Deathmatching -In the video provided you are seen running over the reporting party while on a bike. This is considered not only NonRp actions to hit someone while on a bike, but also death matching. You had no valid reason to attack the reporting party with the evidence provided. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Administrator Kat
  4. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: Rondo_Montana (34) - Can you please provide your POV of this situation. Why did you ignore demands to put your hands up, and other rp in VOIP before beginning to shoot at the reporting party? Are you familiar with our FearRP rules? Gutta_Smith (112) - Can you explain why you seemed to be AFK and ignoring all rp/demands? If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Administrator Kat
  5. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: Ramsey_Kanoun (148) - Can you explain what your motive was to run over the reporting party. Do you know that using a bike to hit someone is unrealistic and considered nonrp? Why did you not show value for your own life by, as mentioned, ramming him with your bike. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Administrator Kat
  6. [REPORT ACCEPTED] After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided to accept this report and issue the following punishments: Dexter_Deshawn [ID 89]: Verbal Warning for Non-RP | In the video evidence provided, you can be seen using your vehicle to push ID 214's vehicle continuously. While there was some previous interaction with these players on the pier, we do not see any reasonable motivation for you to use and damage your vehicle as well as theirs in such a way. You must remember to value your possessions at all times as it would not be realistic to sacrifice the integrity your vehicle and have to end up paying for repairs just because you wanted to move their vehicle. Please be mindful of your actions at all times and consider if they are realistic before acting. Verbal Warning for OOC Toxicity | As a member of this community we expect each and every single player to treat each other with the utmost respect at all times, no matter what previous interactions or grievances you have with them. We encourage everyone to be welcoming and helpful to one another and so, we expect you to refrain from calling other players twats or anything of the sort. Don't let it happen again. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Admin Kat & Sr. Support Gaz
  7. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Leonardo_Harris (22) - NonRP & MG Warning - You blocked and subsequently rammed the reporting party with a vehicle that has a substantial investment behind it. Using it in such a way shows a lack of caring for an expensive item that would be considered NonRP. Both you and Letov_Vladislav have admitted to being in a Discord call together. While you claim to not have been using discord for metagaming, the fact that you are talking in game and across 3rd party coms is a violation of the metagaming rule. Letov_Vladislav (95) - MG Warning - Both you and Leonardo_Harris have admitted to being in a Discord call together. While you claim to not have been using discord for metagaming, the fact that you are talking in game and across 3rd party coms is a violation of the metagaming rule. Gary_Korpov - NonRP - You filed this report against several others for the NonRP behavior of using an expensive vehicle to ram/block while also committing the same offense yourself. The counterclaim of DM against you is voided due to the desync that was observed in your own video evidence, thank you for that. You also returned to the scene expressing concern, as it was an unintentional hit even though you were not even sure you had hit him. What I am sad about however is that this whole scenario, the chase and report, could have been avoided had a report been made in-game to clarify the situation. Donnie_Drakk (34) - NonRP - While desync may be the cause of the apparent ram, the fact that you intended to block him in with an expensive vehicle shows improper care for your vehicle which is why we are accepting this. Mikey_Oo (92) - NonRP Spoken To - We are trusting your claim that the block was unintentional, however you inadvertently placed your life in jeopardy. In the future please make sure you show proper fear, even if you think it's just people joking around. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. This report will now be locked and archived. Regards, Administrator Kat & Senior Support Arrta
  8. REPORT DENIED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After our deliberations, we’ve concluded that this report will be denied for the following reason(s): We believe the reporting part truly did not know that a rebla was considered a high end suv and he is apologetic for his actions. There was nothing lost in this report from either side, therefor it is denied. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report t/pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Sr. Support Arta Administrator Kat
  9. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Jack_Recole (222) -To explain about your punishment, I would like to direct your attention to the reporting player's evidence. The reporting player was going into the prison from Medbay, and the reported player decided to ran towards the reporting player and start punching the DOC officer without any proper interaction/demands. The result of punching was injuring the DOC officer and this action is showing a break of Deatmatching rule here If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Sr. Support Invoker Administrator Kat
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.