Jump to content

Brawnkoh

Donator
  • Content Count

    485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Brawnkoh last won the day on July 31 2019

Brawnkoh had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

288 Excellent

6 Followers

About Brawnkoh

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,455 profile views
  1. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: [Addf_Adfa [ID #112]] - [NonRP #2] - [Mixing IC'/OOC Content - Sorry for the delay, I've been on a leave of absence. Addf, all ooc interactions must be responded to using ooc methods. Since VOIP is IC, it's considered mixing to use VOIP to respond to an OOC question. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Brawnkoh
  2. Brawnkoh

    ID 177 [VDM]

    PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): I apologize for the delay. I don't believe this hit was intentional. It did change the RP scenario, which is unfortunate. There's a fine line between IC and OOC interactions, and after discussion with Alex, as well as other staff members, no punishments will be handed out. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Brawnkoh & alexalex303
  3. Hello sir, Would you be open to a trade? I have 2 3G properties in a single Vinewood house I would be interested in trading for your 4G. One has a standard construction interior, and the other has the unique hallway interior.
  4. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: [Logan_Clark [ID #29]] - This being a new player, did you make any attempt to explain to him what he was doing wrong? [Addf_Adfa [ID #112]] - [Notified IG] Why were you mixing IC and OOC content? If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Brawnkoh
  5. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): You didn't hit the player model with the tazer, you hit the bike (the handlebars to be specific). There was no need for the player to RP being tazed when you did not even hit him. Even in a perfect world where you had hit him, I don't know how a player is supposed to know they were tazed riding a bike by at over 100kph. There is already a report against you for this incident, so I will allow them to handle any rule breaks that may be involved in the report as that report is already pending. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Brawnkoh
  6. Thanks for the post @jaredpav. As @BallinByNature mentioned this will require pre-approval from administration. I will pend it for Senior Administration. Odds are this will require some sort of discussion among them so please be patient.
  7. Brawnkoh

    ID 50 VDM

    I was about to accept this, but it appears bakmeel has already handed out a punishment for the event. Locked & Archived.
  8. Brawnkoh

    ID 223 [DM]

    I have unarchived and unlocked this as I didn't realize @Archaeah had already taken this and it was pending her. I will let her decide if she want's to archive.
  9. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Our goal for new players is to coach, and I believe this is a coachable moment. Konstantin_Gvozdev per our rules as Steve has mentioned banks, hospitals, government buildings are all NCZs. As well as the blocks around them. Please open up the rulebook and read the NCZ section so you are 100% clear about where is a No Crime Zone, and where isn't. You can typically see if you are in a No Crime Zone by typing /ncz or looking at the lower left of your screen there will be a blue notification stating that you are in a No Crime Zone. @Moroz I've added a note to your record that I have spoken to you regarding No Crime Zones, and if a situation like this arises again more severe action will be taken. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Brawnkoh
  10. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: [Martin_Heff [ID #136]] - [NonRP] - [Offense #2] - [Lack of value of friends life] I received no response here, so I can only go off the information included. I believe ID 43 did show a fear for his life. When you aimed at him he stopped and responded. I could see how it could get confusing pulling wheat out of 3 different vans at the same time. I'm not sure if it was intentional, or accidental. I then believe when you held him at gunpoint Martin_Heff attempted to save the other individual. He did so by running you over. You had a gun pointed at you, and so this was not VDM. However, You were so close to the other individual that he ran both of you over. I believe if he were trying to save his friend, he wouldn't also risk hitting his friend in the process. It doesn't make much RP sense. As such, he will receive a NonRP for not valuing his friends life. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Brawnkoh
  11. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: [Yun_Rose [ID #198]] - [FearRP] - [NonRP #4 & #5] I apologize for the time it took to resolve this, it slipped through the cracks and I didn't realize this one was pending since the thread wasn't tagged with an FR. After speaking with Alex, we have come to the below decision. @Holysan In the video included, I believe you broke fear RP in both circumstances. You had a heavy weapon pointed at you at close range, you had no weapon out (due to driving), your bike provides no protection, and you were at close to a complete stop. No punishments will be handed out for the other parties involved. The third video is cut and dry no Fear RP in my opinion, the second video is borderline. There are 3 people on bikes, I don't see how you could be holding a gun at all 3 of them at the same time. The second set of demands are given moving. In the cases where something is borderline I err in the side of caution and give someone the benefit of doubt. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Brawnkoh & @alexalex303
  12. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: [Jack_Mack [ID #43]] - [ Notified IG ] - Why did you steal the reporters wheat after being told not to? [Martin_Heff [ID #186]] - [ Notified IG )] - Why did you run over both of the individuals in the video? If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Brawnkoh
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.