Jump to content

DrizzyDre

Moderator
  • Content Count

    875
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

DrizzyDre last won the day on May 12

DrizzyDre had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

821 Excellent

6 Followers

About DrizzyDre

  • Rank
    Esteemed Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,476 profile views
  1. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): After speaking with Charlie, I concluded the evidence did not reach the community guidelines for player reports (no audio). This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Drizzy & Krooks
  2. DrizzyDre

    152 (VDM)

    PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Petti_White [ID #152] - Will receive Deathmatch #1 Petti will receive the following punishment based on the fact that she breached a rule change that was edited last month. (See quote). However the reason she received the full punishment and not a warning is because her actions did have a impact on the roleplay (causing the reported party to get injured). If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Drizzy & Krooks
  3. Pending review by myself and @krooks365 Please be patient while we look into this! @Charliepollock10 - please send the evidence over to myself on discord (Drizzy) and Krooks.
  4. Pending review by myself & @Jellay Please be patient while we review this so far!
  5. PLAYER REPORT PENDING ACTION Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. Please review the below and amend your report. Use the correct reporting format found in the following; You will be given 24 hours to amend your report with the information required and if you fail to do so within the given time-frame, this report will be invalidated. Regards, Drizzy
  6. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Abdou_Chbab [ID #514] - Will receive a warning note on his account for non RP. Player Abdou had no prior interaction with the player or any reason to rob him apart from being injured which is non RP and shows very poor standards, especially with people closeby of eye-shot distance, therefore will be receiving said warning note on his account. If we are looting someone we should have some motive to do so against the person. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Drizzy & Krooks
  7. Hey there! Thanks for posting an appeal as you have the rights to appeal decisions you do not agree with. I'll begin with firstly stating, the evidence in the original report speaks for itself. You stood outside a store, got in someones face and gave demands for them to put their hands up. You also went first person during the interaction to mimic your characters hand to do the gun aiming gesture without a gun. You also stated yourself you were trolling in your response which was clear in the clip. You are a part of a official faction that represents the server, you are expected to behave within the rules and lead by example. I also remember you being part of a house raid specifically when myself and @Awazki spoke about the new robbery rules in depth, when it took place, So you are more than aware of the new ruling which has been here for almost a month. ((The unix of this conversation can be provided on request to the SA)) The reason you were given the full punishment for non RP #2 was the fact 1) you attempted to perform a robbery outside a store (public area) & Also was the sole reason for what happened after. Your trolling actions caused a shootout and put yourself in danger just because you had a friend closeby. Their was no realism or end goal with your actions and therefore was reprimanded. Trolling friends IC behind closed doors is one thing, ''trolling'' people you don't know in public causing the situation you did is another. You also had an illegal attachment on your .50 (the silencer) which would add further reason to why you WOUDN'T draw any attention to yourself in a public place. It's now up to the senior administrator to decide however I will say I believe the punishment fits the actions that were taken in this report, given the whole situation. Regards, Drizzy
  8. DrizzyDre

    152 (VDM)

    Myself & @krooks365 will be handling this report. Please be patient while we review it.
  9. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Norix_Helsinki [ID#281] - Will receive his non RP #2 for this situation. Norix will receive non RP #2 for the following reasons; Whether your gun/weapon is out or not, behaving in the manner you did, is still technically demands opening for a robbery. Not all robberies/muggings are combated with a weapon. This is still technically an attempt of theft outside a store. Because he was not under fear RP he was open to respond how he did. Secondly failing that, you, yourself describe your actions as trolling which does fit what was shown. You are an experienced player and it comes across as baiting a situation of which it did happen after your actions. The reason Reece is not punished, from his recording it came across natural with no pre-plans of what took place. However for the fact you lead the roleplay in terms of a botched attempting of a unarmed robbery/trolling (described by your own words) i.e non RP actions you are hereby receiving the punishment. You should always remain aware of your actions as this is a roleplay server and it is not for trolling. Your actions caused the rest of the situation to take place. You also go first POV using the hand animation for holding a gun to further your demands. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Drizzy
  10. I'm sure youll get higher offers but I'll start it off with a bid of $6m.
  11. Player ID 514 - Abdou_Chbab - Please provide your side to the report ~ Why did you loot this injured person? Player will be notified in-game and be given 24 hours to respond with their side. Player 337 will not be tagged in this report due to the fact upon reviewing the evidence you swerved to his side of the road causing the collision therefore the collision has been deemed an IC collision. Regards, Drizzy & Krooks
  12. Player 281 - Norix_Helsinki @Berlin - Please provide your side to the report above ; also commenting on what you were trying to acheive with your initial roleplay? Also on the following comments; 1) Why were you giving demands outside a store which would be populated with the clerk and customers? 2) Why did you go first person during this roleplay to mimic a gun in your hand while giving demands? Player 253 - Reece_Curry @reeceobz- Please provide your side to the report? Do you know the Norix Helsinki IC'ly? Also what was the play here, why were you both set up outside the store in this fashion? Players will be notified in-game and be given 24 hours to respond with their side.
  13. Pending review by myself Please be patient while I look into this, thankyou.
  14. Pending review by myself & @krooks365 Please be patient while we look into this report.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.