Jump to content

Psychoneurotic

Member
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

20 Excellent

3 Followers

About Psychoneurotic

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

498 profile views
  1. It'd be a shame if this post gets buried under every other useless suggestion. Would it be possible for one of the staff to comment on this?
  2. -1. Cutting hair in real life is considered battery, not a fucking "sexual assault" or "torture". Here's a suggestion for all of the people who feel tortured or sexually assaulted by /cuthair: you should have a KOS in order to cut hair.
  3. Alright niceguy™, there's already been a similar report, suggesting that reactions shouldn't be a thing, and it was denied by a current Admin and a previous senior admin.
  4. Huge +1. Very detailed suggestion and it also brings a ton of more attraction, positive action, and good RP to the server
  5. Making bold decisions like "Crosshair removal, Gun Licensee removal, map removal, stricter DM rules, adding food and thirst bar" did upset a majority of the player-base but it ended up being good decisions in the long run. Personally I don't see the difference and I'd love to know your point of view on that @alexalex303
  6. I see what you're saying and I agree with most of the things that you're saying. Maybe I wasn't clear in the first statement. If you've done nothing wrong, the chances of you getting punished for it is close to 0% so you have nothing to worry about in that case. What people worry about, is how long their time gets wasted because someone else wants to get even with them OOCly; they'd much rather put their time to good use than waste it online. The problem is, they don't only look like a fool, they make you look like a fool by wasting your time. In my case and many other cases, who write detailed answers to reports, it takes hours to deal with a false report. I'm glad we're on the same page regarding most of your second paragraph. Sometimes people just don't understand the rule or RP situation, and it wastes everyone's time, and it usually ends up being a learning experience for them; good for them. People who "use OOC means to create false report purely made out of anger and rage to harass the victim" don't fall into that category.
  7. For years we've seen people get fucking clapped ICly and then resort to OOC methods to get even. OOC methods including "/pm 1 see you on the forums fuckhead :DDD" or "/b [Insert discriminatory remarks here]". That itself is breaking the 6.6 rule (Players must not threaten other players or use offensive language in OOC chat or OOC context). What goes beyond threatening people with reports in the OOC chat, is actually carrying out the threat and making False reports. It wastes the staff's time and it causes discomfort and stress on the individual who's being reported. It is understandable why the staff team hasn't decided to make false reports punishable, as it creates a grey area between what is a deliberate false report, purely made out of anger and rage to harass the victim, and what is simply just a report that got rejected because there wasn't enough evidence or the report wasn't deliberately made as a way to harass the other person. Please note that neither me or anyone else who's brought up this issue thinks people should get punished because their report got denied, that's absurd. People should get punished for using OOC means to waste staff's time and harass other players instead. My personal suggestion is having something along the lines of the Defamation Act 2013 (Oversimplified version of defamation is "The communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of an individual."). People being innocent until proven otherwise. That means most reports that get denied won't have any affects on the person who made the report, but people who go out of their way to be an ass are going to be punished. The example below is a clear case of someone using OOC means to harass someone, because they got clapped ICly. Crosshair removal, Gun Licensee removal, map removal, stricter DM rules, adding food and thirst bar, they've all been grey areas and people in the staff team managed to get them to work. It's truly applaudable and I'm certain if the staff team disagrees with my method of identifying and punishing false reports, they can use their own creativity to quickly come up with a solution, as they have in the past.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.