Yputi

This is something that kinda already is possible. In the past I've seen some PD officers creating some speed trap setups. Basically, a PD car with the equipment to read the speed of people. That officer was then placed RIGHT after a bridge so you couldnt see him/her and a few meter furthher there was a High Speed Unit from PD to pull the people speeding over.

As thos are more public area's. Multiple people got things to do there.

+1 It's good you added that they would need a license. At Weazel, only a few people are allowed to use the helicopter and only after a training. I do think this should become an exclusive thing though, just like the supercars now.

I do think its better to have an adress and a map with all adresses. I love the command where you can see your houses with teh addition of the adress, but maybe combine that withh an actual map with all the streets on it? With party-invite system I ment more something like a mactmaking game. You get an invite to join a group to play together, that is what I did mean. I think the actual adresses could be made more usefull with a map with all the streets on it. With such a map it would be possible to save adresses and remember them. then you dont need a invite to know where the house is as mostly when you navigate to teh location you have the location itself...

About the renting thing; I have seen a similar suggestion for renting cars. Though, this idea was stopped because that way people would be able to rent supercars and that would lower the value of those cars (which I like they are overpriced as that makes them really special). I am not sure how this will end up with houses. There are people who buy multiple houses and I would love to see them renting those. That way more people can actually get a house without spending the full price for it right away. Not sure about the invite commands though... Seems like a little party-invite system... I don't see how this would be a thing IRL.

Small update (again, I know): So I have encountered a person again who I saw earlier (2 days ago). This is actually a person RP'ing a 10 year old. People were already questioning about RP'ing this age, but it was all good as he properly RP'ed like one (being in the car as passenger). Now, I see the 10 year old driving a quad... Would this be considered promoting poorRP or would this be poorRP if he actually got a drivers license for it? For me its weird and seems more like a troll, but thats just my opnion and I thought this was worth mentioning to show how this goes in practice.

Well, I stated if I like it or not. I like the idea, but just not how it's implemented right now. So without tweaking I would like it to be remnoved, but I see how this gets updated and improved. The thing of RP is that kinda everything is unnecessary. It's not there to make things easier, it's there to imrpove RP and bring ECRP closer to be as realistic as possible.

I like this idea TBH. Actually, when I newly joined the server I didn't notice you could only open the map with keyboard (I am a controller user for some parts) and I was like.. quite happy it was a thing you had to navigate out of your head. I do think there should be an toggle though. Like people these days have Google Maps on their phone. So maybe that if people got a phone they can use their phone to see the map and navigate, but when they dont have a phone, the battery is dead or someoen robbed people and took away their battery that they can't navigate anymore. I see some potential and I am curious what others think.

I do have to agree on this from one side. We try to be as realistic as possible COMPARED to IRL, but we don't/cannot have everything we have IRL. IRL, there are far more cars on teh road, so alot of traffic rules. Sadly, GTA got way less. What I am saying is that Louie does have a slight point in my eyes. IF the speedcamera's should be added, it would make sense to have them into palces where safety is more important and wehre its more croweded (so, NCZ's). (IMO) we don't always have to have things like IRL, it needs to be balanced and make sense like it does IRL. Imagine the amount of people you encounter in GTA on the highway now... If the highway was so empty IRL the speedlimit was probably set higher. I still stick to my +1, but again... we need more details to give a proper opinion.

I don't really think the poll makes sense atm. Some people vote no for removing it, but want it to be tweaked. Others vote yes as they want it to be tweaked... So its kinda random now as there is no option in between. Maybe add a 3th option: "The weights should stay, but tweaked"?

I like the idea, but I see its downsides: Guns are not always used in criminal activities. Also, how will you prevent them getting guns with the help of others? I already had tons of people asking me to get a gun for them because they didn't had their gun license yet to get one themselves. I don't think limiting will help in this case. Personally I can't think of any other solution involving scripts. I think just written rules should be made against this and peopel just need to report when broken.

0 Don't think its bad having this system, but it isnt that well balanced at the moment. It is weird how a wrench takes up less space then a radio. As the most updates; it needs to be ironed out. There is space for improvement and I see potential in this system to improve RP. My it's good to make a list and compare everythign with eachother in terms of weight and how big it is. My conclusion: I dont think it should be removed, only updated.

+1 for me. I actually did find an admin mark with the text: "A second /park maybe for the people who live inside this area?" https://gyazo.com/5a2eb6f9456db8e1c215cd0824fee905 I don't think the location where I found this marker is a suited location as it belongs to a house. I would love to see some public parkinglots. Maybe parkinglots with prices based on the location or the kind of area it is located in. But it should be areas that are open and public, so not ones that are attached to houses (as where I found the marker). Here an example maybe of what I think what should be good (please only pay attention to the location): And then maybe make it $450 to park here as its in the city, but not as close to some important things as the already exsisting parkinglot.

+1 I like this idea. I remember months ago (around 5) a PD officer actually RP'ed he wasn't able to identify a speeding biker because he was wearing a helmet. I was really glad it was RP'ed and I believe it should stay this way. I would love to see people are able to buy helmets in clothing stores. Maybe they can toggle them with a command similar to teh mask (/togglehelmet). The random helmet ruines my outfit sometimes. I also hope, IF it will be considered to be added, it is possible to add some protection physics for bikers. So when they crash or fall they get less HP loss when they were wearing a helmet. Eitherway, big +1 for me. Escpecially I wear alot of outfits that match completely and I would love to have a matchign helmet.

Mind me if I misunderstand or whatever, but I do remember the protection is lifted when they do crimes themselves: https://gyazo.com/1ce543c743f57946ee9a0353d0438960 Rule 7.5.5 states this as show in the SS

+1 Though, I would like to have some more details about how it will work. Hard to decide what to vote without any info, but still support the idea.

Update: I have checked all the comments. First of all, thank you so much for these. First I want to answer some comments with my opinion: @Xoza: I searched hours and hours for offical rules against this. Sadly I didn't came far. Then I am talking about legal reasons. The game (GTA V) is a 18+ game and states it contains graphical content. What I did find was this post on Steam: https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/0/282992646969557466/ This adds up to your point where there should be a zero tolerance of ERP with characters that are underaged. Commign back to the point where an ECRP staff member was upset finding 2 characters performing an act of ERP with an underaged caharcter informed, the staff member was disgusted and not happy. There are people in this community that don't really bother seeing this or performing this themselves, but there are also people who do. Personally I think it's a no-go, but it's not that upsetting for me as I do realize it's still a game. @Denni: I did some research (again) and I did find the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_European_Game_Information GTA V is classified as PEGI 18. However, PEGI ratings are there to HELP European consumers make informed decisions when buying video games. I do believe this is something the server shouldn't be bussy with. Everyone is different and behaves different. It's up their parents, themselves or sellers of the games to decided if they should play or not. I did see some discussions about this earlier and I did agree on some points. Still, I do think this is something to deal with by Rockstar or Steam and not by the server EXCEPT in exceptional situations. @Flucifial: I agree, 100%. What does make this hard in my opinion is that we (as the people controlling the characters) already have some knoledge that you might didn't had in the past. It will be hard to say something like: "You didn't had that knowledge when you were that old". Then it would be assuming as there are not fact to rely on. My conclusion (for now): I do think its great to have everyone's opinion and POV. Once again, this helped alot. Personally I would appreciate some dedicated guide for people who RP an underaged character. If it is alone to remind them what would be considered promoting poorRP and the /do's we would expect from them as scriptwise this isn't possible, but the info would be important. This updated will be added to the original post and the titel of the original post will be updated.

I would update the post tomorrow. Also add my new POV on this.

I remember an staff member (not gonna name anyone) that was curious because he spotted people doing ERP with an underaged involved. I am just trying to figure out what you would think and I am open for everything.

So also ERP should still be there for underaged?

Do you think no proper guidelines should be added to this kind of RP?

RP should be realistic and yes, I do agree it should be possible to RP it. As Vasquez mentioned though, I do think there should be clear rules: "But as said, I think it's important to have some proper guide lines and rules to make sure people don't abuse this opportunity for their own sick fantasies or so." Realisticly you won't put a 10 year old in jail. But from the other side, a 10 year old wouldn't lockpick a car. I still agree with Vasquez there should be clear and proper guide lines for this as I did see this in the past. Not to mention how I did see some people were 14 and 1 day later they were 18 and got their gun license.

RPing yes. Title: Minimum RP age I will make it more clear, thanks

So just so I know I understand you right: You SHOULD be able to RP underaged, but there should be strict rules and it should be clearly defined in the rulebook? Also, do you think there should be a minimum at all? 10 years old is a little xtreme imo, but thats me.

The admin I spoke with indeed did tell me RP'ing underaged is allowed, as long as ERP isnt involved.