Jump to content

Dalvichan

Member
  • Content Count

    538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

207 Excellent

6 Followers

About Dalvichan

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,600 profile views
  1. This player has been permanently banned from the server. This report is now closed.
  2. REPORT ACCEPTED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and all evidence provided, I’ve decided to accept this report and issue the following punishments: • Bjorn_Christensen (295), Gord_Downie (184), Tommy_Berlusconi (319) &Sergej_Ivanov (305) - Breach of NCZ (Spoken to Warning) - Players will receive said warning for robbing ID 213 (Joe_Peralta) within a No Crime Zone. To follow accordance with the rules, players are not allowed to commit crimes while inside or very near to a NCZ. In the POV provided, all players mentioned with the punishment did just that.
  3. REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and all evidence provided, I’ve decided to deny this report based on the following reasoning(s): The reported player Harvey_Michelson did not breach Fear-RP in the evidence provided as the reporting player ran away, lowering his weapon and around a corner, no longer placing Harvey under Fear-RP. His life was no longer in danger in that moment and he took that to his advantage. Thank you for submitting your report. This report is now denied and archived. Kind regards, RogueK & Dalvichan
  4. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  5. REPORT ACCEPTED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and all evidence provided, I’ve decided to accept this report and issue the following punishments: • Jo_Brown (141) - Not Here to RP- After reviewing the footage provided, player will be receiving the said punishment for multiple rule-breaches in one scenario; the constant mixing, powergaming, blatant disregard for any roleplay happening around him, and finally the combat logging proves to us that ID 141 (Jo_Brown) is not here to RP. Going forward, we suggest players not take punishments lightly as they are a
  6. REPORT ACCEPTED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and all evidence provided, I’ve decided to accept this report and issue the following punishments: • Prozacel_Will (187) - Warning for DM | VDM - Player will be receiving a VDM warning for intentionally running over the reporting player (Lex_Roth) during a shootout. As mentioned "Vehicles cannot be used as weapons in active shootouts unless where unavoidable" and in this case, it was definitely avoidable. Prozacel_Will had other options of taking out the opponent but instead chose to get into his vehicle and
  7. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  8. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  9. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  10. REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and all evidence provided, I’ve decided to deny this report based on the following reasoning(s): You were arrested by law enforcement and punished In-Character for the crimes you had committed, you have provided no evidence that would demonstrate that there was no IC reason for you receiving the suspension. If you have an issue with an IC punishment for a crime you need to bring that up with the group charging you or giving you the suspension. You being unaware of the specific reasoning behind your charge or suspe
  11. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  12. REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and all evidence provided, I’ve decided to deny this report based on the following reasoning(s): If your gun is scriptly visible, then it is IC'ly visible. This has always been the case. There is no rule break in regards to this situation. Thank you for submitting your report. This report is now denied and archived. Kind regards, RogueK & Dalvichan
  13. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  14. Thank you for making this report. This is now pending review from myself. Your patience is appreciated during this time.
  15. Just because it doesn't make RP sense for YOUR character, doesn't mean it isn't beneficial to others. There are many people with RP backgrounds and legitimate reasons to be in multiple factions. There area already currently players who are affected by this issue, being in two factions already and participating in a third (two jobs, one hobby). Again, it may not be beneficial to you or your RP, but others' ability to expand their characters RP'ly in whatever way they wish (and, not to mention, in no way affecting you) shouldn't be hindered because you're not intersted.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.