Jump to content

PolarBlunk

Moderator
  • Content Count

    523
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

PolarBlunk last won the day on October 11 2017

PolarBlunk had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

131 Excellent

About PolarBlunk

Recent Profile Visitors

2,510 profile views
  1. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): No audio in recording. Screenshots do not show the full context. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, PolarBlunk
  2. Even though no VOIP was used during the situation, we still require it per the guidelines. Videos and screenshots must be viewable with readable resolution, screenshots must be at a reasonable sized. Again no editing or tampering with video or photo evidence. Audio should not be removed from the footage. If video or audio contains sensitive information, you may request to send to the administrator directly as to not make the information public. Is there a version with the audio?
  3. Is there evidence with audio?
  4. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Marcel_Litewiak [ID 109] - Notified IG - Please explain your side of the story from the situation of both Fear Roleplay & Combat Logging. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, PolarBlunk
  5. Hello and thank you for your report! This is now being reviewed by me.
  6. Please add the video if possible.
  7. Hello and thank you for your report! It is being reviewed by myself.
  8. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Cheyenne_Akkada [ID 91] - Deathmatch #1 - You had insufficient reason to run the two players over that were blocking the road. As seen in the recording, you could have went the same route as the other vehicles, yet you chose to ram two players that had not done anything to you and they only blocked the road. They had not hurt or arrest you/or ally or damaged your property in the situation. You have not shown any evidence to prove your claims of you not being able to see the two players you ram, and it seems intentional to me from what I have gathered. If what you are saying is true, that you do lag a lot - it is your responsibility to make sure that this does not negatively impact other players experience in roleplay situations and you should not engage in roleplay under these circumstances. Regarding the Fear Roleplay - there is insufficient evidence in the player report to make a fair judgement on this. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, PolarBlunk
  9. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): The reported party was never under Fear Roleplay due to not having a weapon aimed at them at a close range. If you wish to put someone under Fear Roleplay, make sure you aim a weapon at them at close range, which this was not. The animations you see with ID 56 is a bug. He had his weapon out at this time, and this was not lag. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, PolarBlunk
  10. PolarBlunk

    ID 67 - DM

    PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Marco_Lopez [ID 67] - Deathmatch #1 - The reporting party followed your demands and put his hands up, never attempted to escape or called other players for help. The reporting party missclicked M for a second and did not call for help during any point of him accidentally pressing the key. Your character knowing he had friends around, is no valid reason to kill the reporting party either. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, PolarBlunk
  11. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): After having discussed this player report with other members of staff, I do not feel that ID 103 or ID 125 was under Fear Roleplay during this situation. ID 103 was driving the bike away from you at the start, over to his friend, ID 125. They seemed to have planned some sort of ambush, and ID 103 was too far away on the bike for the Fear Roleplay to count, as you had to have your firearm aimed at him at close range, which you did not, during any point in this situation. I feel that the gunfight between you and ID 125 was fair. The shootout between you and ID 125 happened within seconds with demands given around the same time as well, and ID 125 was already expecting you to come around the corner, as well with the two of you not being pretty close together. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, PolarBlunk
  12. PolarBlunk

    ID 67 - DM

    PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Marco_Lopez [ID 67] - Notified IG - Please give your side of the story to the report. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, PolarBlunk
  13. PolarBlunk

    DM

    PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Fumar_Smith [ID 155] - Deathmatch #1 - The reporting party was never under the Fear Roleplay rule as his vehicle was not stalled or had the engine turned off. You can not attack another player or their property for non-compliance if they are not under Fear Roleplay. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, PolarBlunk
  14. PolarBlunk

    ID 67 - DM

    Hello and thank you for your player report. This is now pending to be reviewed by myself.
  15. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Tico_Christina [ID 56] - Notified IG - Please explain your side of the story. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, PolarBlunk
×
×
  • Create New...