Jump to content

FatherOsborn

Head Administrator
  • Content Count

    1,286
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

FatherOsborn last won the day on December 17 2019

FatherOsborn had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,337 Excellent

About FatherOsborn

  • Rank
    Veteran

Recent Profile Visitors

10,568 profile views
  1. Hello, thank you for your report. After reviewing this report and the evidence provided by both parties with another Head Administrator @Lewis, we have concluded that no rules were broken in this scenario. Above, I have underlined two reasons why we deem this as not Fear RP. The two officers deliberately put themselves at a safe distance from the store, and one of the officers (which you have your aim focused on in the video) has a car (object) blocking your view. Your friend and the female officer both pull their guns at the same time and aim at each other at the same time, as proven in the video above. On the other hand, both you and your friend step outside the store into the open with 0 cover, and you try to hold two officers at gunpoint who has a car (object) to their disposal for cover. Perhaps you should reconsider your own actions in the future before you try to root out problems in somebody else's. I feel that your actions lacked some strategy in this situation to successfully pull this off properly. Regardless, we thank you for making this report. - Lewis & Osborn.
  2. Hello, thank you for your appeal. 12/Sep/19 02:10 PM Corado_Cattani Dante_Kalshnikov - Give Money + $106,000 $106,000 False 12/Sep/19 02:10 PM Dante_Kalshnikov Corado_Cattani - Give Money - $106,000 $76 False After which he bought 24 guns the same day, 25 more on September 19, 26 more on October 5th 28 more on October 26th And it continues all the way until February, this year, up until you were both banned. In total, he has purchased around 1092 guns and transferring them between you and other players. He role-plays knowing his alt through his main and vice versa, and he simply logouts from his main purely to login to his alt and mass buy weapons from this particular gun store where the price is lowered to $1. This will be pending further discussion and review by Senior Staff.
  3. Pending re-calculation & assets removal on that new calculation. Any staff member may grab.
  4. As per the founder's request, we do not refund the expected return. We only protect 75% of the initial borrowed sum. If a staff member has miscalculated on a refund request, it can always be amended. The refund you linked was never processed. Locking this until assets are removed.
  5. @Aaron Martin @Xoza Please try and sort this loan out In Character and if it isn't possible, provide us with an update ASAP.
  6. Hello, thank you for your report. Serthon and I have spoken to RedHot as he claims, and there's no denying that RedHot abused game mechanics to gain a speed advantage in the footage attached to this report. After this situation, RedHot reached out to Bakmeel and explained what he had done, and as RedHot claims - it was a call of poor judgement for him side, a judgement he made after speaking to another staff member which communicated wrong information to him. Regardless of the above, there's no question about RedHot's experience and ability to continue administrate the community. And as we would with any other player, RedHot has received a note on his record, which makes this his first punishment since joining this community. Should this happen again, it will result in more severe consequences. - Osborn & Serthon.
  7. Team Update: XposeD has been removed from the staff team as an Administrator.
  8. Thank you for your response. This report will be accepted. There is no script issue here, you're assuming that the gun would be next to the player but you also have no idea how the player ended up injured in the first place. Reviewing logs, the player was run over by a car about 4 minutes after going off duty from MD. You took no time out of your day to RP with the players involved, you randomly appear with your (assuming friends), get out and loot an injured player who is actively receiving treatment by MD. You made no effort to contribute to either players' immersion, you didn't give the medic a chance to role-play or even bother asking any environmental description questions to the injured player. How can you do better next time? Well for a starter, it doesn't make much sense to go around and randomly loot injured players that you have no involvement with, ESPECIALLY when they are being actively treated by a medic. If you're not involved in the situation in the first place, you should make attempts to involve yourself into the RP and getting an understanding of what's going on. As Noah said above, had you simply asked in a /do, he could've told you that there'd be no guns on the floor. Be more considerate of your actions in the future, please. On behalf of me, Kris will be issuing a Non-RP punishment. - Osborn.
  9. This was a very poor response. I do not like it. Do you not feel as if there's a different circumstance here than just an injured player? You're technically removing the medic's right to obstruct your search by swooping in and pressing I when the medic is in the middle of an animation which they cannot cancel from. The medic is stabilizing a patient, working on them. Do you find it realistic yourself? Does this contribute to immersion? This feels like ruleplaying rather than roleplaying. Let's not forget, this is a rule as well: 8. Non-Roleplay (NRP) Actions that are unrealistic or promote poor quality roleplay are considered as non-roleplay.
  10. That's a bit taken out of context. We only had 48 members online because we have several scheduled things on Sundays. It's the day when people come online from all timezones to attend their IC meetings, you didn't have 48 members patrolling in the city. Supervisor Meeting Command Meeting SWAT Training Investigations Meeting This has been the case for several months now. Recruitment for EU in PD is closed at the moment but we will continue to recruit for NA and OC as we lack members in those times. PD is expected to provide the server with 24/7 service to all players, PD is not expected to just focus on a single situation, they are meant to be able to take care of multiple situations at once.
  11. Hello, thank you for your suggestion. All of our staff are volunteers and all the time they contribute to this community is purely voluntarily, we appreciate what they do every day. Depending on the volume of punishment appeals, and the nature of them, it may take longer in some cases to receive a response than usual. As for technical issues etcetera, we've got a fully staffed Support Staff team to assist you with that - and the easiest and quickest way to get assistance regarding technical issues is through #i_have_a_question on discord. As for player reports, they are done on regular basis by Senior Support and above. I will not comment on your ban on this suggestion, if you are still an active user and wish to appeal this, you may attempt to do so. - Osborn.
  12. Hello, thank you for your suggestion. We have since the creation of this suggestion strengthened our conflict of interest policy and situations involving persons whom staff members may have a conflict of interest with should be handled by another staff member, unless of course it's an emergency and/or there are no other staff members available at the time, or that they're a senior member of the Staff Team (Administrators). This has and will not be an issue, but you can always reach out to a member of Senior Staff if you have concerns about a Staff Member and a potential conflict of interest. - Osborn.
  13. 25/JAN/2020 Changed under 13. Fear Roleplay (FRP): OLD: Driving a vehicle in an active shootout more than once without the intent of protecting a friend, fleeing with it, or using it as cover. NEW: Driving a vehicle into an active shootout more than once without the intent of providing cover for a friend or yourself, or fleeing with it. CLARIFICATION: Following a staff team meeting, we recognized that the wording of the old line made it seem like you could circle back into an active shootout and ram players in that shootout using "the intent of protecting a friend". This now means that you cannot drive into an active shootout more than once with the intent to ram players in that shootout, unless it's unavoidable when you are trying to flee from the active shootout. Added under 15. Player Theft, Prison Breakout, and Kidnapping Players can give consent to other players to be kidnapped outside of the stipulations above if the roleplay makes sense, but they should in such cases avoid involving law enforcement in any way due to the consented roleplay. CLARIFICATION: There has been times when two or more players have been involved in a roleplay where one party has wanted to kidnap the other party, but being unable to do so because they hadn't met the stipulations to do so. We are now allowing players to consent to being kidnapped, however, due to the consented roleplay, we ask that all players involved tries their best not to involve law enforcement.
  14. ECLIPSE SERVER RULES CHANGELOG All changes to and clarifications on our official server rules will be documented on this forum thread. Previous updates (not covered in the changelog): 10/JUN/2019 17/JUL/2019 17/DEC/2019
  15. Thank you for your suggestion. We do not believe that the current timer needs to be changed, it's part of the whole mentality of fearing over your assets - Use your vehicles wisely, and leave them in wise spots or utilize scripted parking lots to despawn them while not in use. - Osborn.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.