Jump to content

MrSix

Member
  • Content Count

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

MrSix last won the day on May 30

MrSix had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

30 Excellent

7 Followers

About MrSix

  • Rank
    Rising Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

991 profile views
  1. MrSix

    Can Delete

    I just want to add that we do take your pocket money but don't keep it for ourselves. We have paperwork to file mentioning how much money we took from you and then that money gets donated to our Media Relations division, which they then use to organize public events. If a cop is secretly keeping your money, they're breaking policies.
  2. MrSix

    Mike Adams - Metagame

    Stop making false assumptions. I did only charge you. We were in TAC, three different people said "The passenger is Harm" and then one other person said " I know the drivers it's (i don't remember the name) I don't know why you're now complaining about your arrest. I wasn't even involved with that. Just go and make a third report, keep the streak going. Charging someone with a mask isn't metagaming? How do you even get to that? Metagaming is when you use OOC information IC'ly. You wearing a mask isn't OOC at all? That's such a weird statement that you make. Personally, I am done replying to your reports. I have said enough for the admin team to decide whether or not I metagamed.
  3. MrSix

    Mike Adams - Metagame

    Make an Internal Affairs report. IC issue.
  4. MrSix

    Mike Adams - Metagame

    Oh boy. I’ll try again. No. The LSPD can NOT charge you with what they want. But that is an IC ISSUE which is resolved with Internal Affairs. Not a forum report. You claimed earlier that nothing happens with IA reports just because you once made one and it wasn’t accepted. I can promise you, if you IA report me it’ll be investigated. Your charges weren’t metagamed. I’m glad the cops actually did continue roleplay and arrested you. As they should’ve by protocol.
  5. MrSix

    ID 34 Non Role Play

    I already said it was wrong to drive the super car to the mountain. Yes we broke that rule and yes it was poor for you to drive like that as well. It was in general not a good Roleplay situation. If you see videos of people driving off when BLOCKED IN by police and guns aimed at them, yes that’s FearRP. We just don’t report each incident like I didn’t report yours. Most of us just want to play the game instead of these forum discussions. That’s why.
  6. MrSix

    Mike Adams - Metagame

    No... someone can’t be impersonating you with your exact looks and voice saying “hey I’m Harm I’m the ex cop”... Whichever charge you got is YET AGAIN an IC issue. You’re still arguing IC issues in an OOC report. Make an Internal Affairs report for that. As you should also have been thought. An admin posting your charges here has absolutely nothing to do with you claiming metagaming. There’s absolutely no proof provided by you that I would’ve metagamed your ID. In fact I don’t even pay attention to that and I never even opened my MDC whilst you were next to me to check who you were...
  7. MrSix

    Mike Adams - Metagame

    Hello Didn't metagame. Never put your ID in the MDC to see who you were. I don't support that kind of rule breach. You identified yourself when I said your name and you replied to it. I IC'ly know you're gang affiliated, I know it was you in the car by voice and I set charges. Worst case scenario I would've set charges on an innocent person and that goes through IA if that would be the case. At no point did I mix OOC with IC, at no point did I use OOC information as an IC advantage, all my decisions were made 100% IC'ly. On top of that, you spoke to me mentioning how you used to be a cop. What are you trying to achieve here man? Metagaming wasn't present here at all. I really have nothing else to add to this...
  8. MrSix

    ID 34 Non Role Play

    Here you are making a complaint about what is IC on an OOC forum report. If you have issues with how police handled the scene you should know, as a former cop, that Internal Affairs is where to discuss this and not here. You were not driving, correct. Did you get out of the vehicle whilst demanded to do so with firearms pointed at you? No. That is what FearRP means. If you got nothing to hide, as you seem to think, why refuse to upload the full footage? Just go ahead and prove me wrong here instead of making IC complaints. I would also like to just make some common sense here. Off-road does not equal mountain climbing. Off-road equals grass terrain, dirt, sand, ... anything that isn't asphalt. Mountain climbing is completely another thing than offroading. I thought you'd at least know that... Please: Furthermore please see the struggles that your kind of off-roading brings to off-road vehicles, and you'll understand why speeding up a mountain makes 0 sense from you guys.
  9. MrSix

    ID 34 Non Role Play

    Hey Harm You're not wrong when saying it's not right to use an 811 to drive off-road so I'm not going to argue that at all. However, it is not necessarily realistic from yourself to take an SUV and start climbing mountains driving over 100 km/h. If you're here to argue realism I just would like to bring up the point that mountains aren't climbed by vehicles. And when vehicles actually do climb a mountain, that's at 10 km/h or less. Besides, you were continuously trying to get PD's attention at a scene by driving onto mountains next to the scene, doing silly stuff. Which I could easily argue was cop-baiting. And then we're not talking about the FearRP from when you were boxed in, had an SMG to your head but still thought it'd be a good idea to wiggle your car free to drive off like a maniac. I didn't clip my recording from the cop-baiting or FearRP part and conveniently enough you did not share this in the report either. Which I find unfortunate. I think it's only fair that you go ahead and upload the entire scene of events so that we're not editing it like we're the only ones doing something incorrectly here. I would like that the administrator taking this report also requests Harm to upload the entire footage. Cop Baiting - Provoking a reaction from emergency services without a realistic reason. Fear roleplay is the concept of roleplaying fear for your character’s safety and life.
  10. As I told you. By the server rules, you're dead when script kills you. When you're down you're just injured. You can't force DeathRP
  11. I'll keep this short. On the scene, we tried to explain to you how by the server rules, you're dead when script kills you. NOT when you're injured. DeathRP is something that cops occasionally grant to suspects or civilians as a reward for good roleplay. Your complaints and attempts to pause our roleplay are what stopped you from being granted permission. I'm not saying we don't look at your kind of injuries. Of course, that will affect whether or not we'll allow it. But when you show no effort into roleplay, most of the time you'll get a no from us.
  12. Hey Lewis I haven't said he did fire at us anywhere in my explanation. DM'ing is about killing someone whilst you have no RP reason to do so. The rule is not just about him shooting at me. I was over radio informed that this vehicle has run over an officer and was ordered to shoot it. So we did, a lot of us did. Did he run an Officer over? No, but is there any way my character could've known that? No. My character was told to disable the vehicle and shoot the driver by the other Officers on the scene and so he did. It was literally impossible for my character to first investigate whether or not the driver actually did hit an Officer. We were continuously suppressed with gunfire and practically anyone on the scene who was not leaving and was not a Police Officer was at this point a threat. Again I'd like to bring up the point that innocent people who don't want to get shot would NEVER park in between the gunfire like that. It's poor RP to do so in my opinion. You're basically not playing FearRP just because you OOC'ly think "If I get shot here, I can say it's DM so I won't have to value my life." Any healthy human being would run for their lives in a situation like this. Not park in the middle and spectate. The shooting part is blatantly an IC mistake. I think it's poor to immediately throw DM at this. My character did IC'ly have reason to shoot but you're looking at this far too black and white. Whilst I get your vision on "in the video he didn't attack you so you can't kill him" I think the scene of events matters a whole lot more.
  13. Account name: MrSix Character name(s): Mike Adams Admin who issued punishment: Lewis Date of punishment: 9/04/2019 Punishment received: 60 Minutes jail time - Deathmatching 1st Offense. Reason given for punishment: there were no demands or anything that warrants Kill on Sight. Your explanation of what happened: First of all it's important to understand the scene of events. My character is part of the Police Force. During my patrol, a Code 1 situation was called (this means all units need to respond , officer in distress) when I arrived on scene, a very big shootout was going on. Involing multiple heavy weapons. On the scene, us Officer's were being shot at from multiple angles. Other than this, over TAC radio, Officers called in being run over by a vehicle. Which is an important detail for this appeal. As the scene was progressing, multiple people started to park their vehicle between the Officers and the attacking gang. People who were not involved with the shootout. To start of, I feel as this is pretty lame. Why would you park your car in the center of a literal war zone? And then be surprised you get shot at? Next, a dark Dominator rolls up the scene, parking along with all the other cars, between the gunfight. As the vehicle is driving along the road, an Officer on the radio tells us this vehicle ran him over. Next thing I know, shots were opened on that car. Nearly all the officers on scene shot. (including me). In the end, the driver was injured. He then claimed we Deathmatched him. Or in other words, attacked him knowing that he did nothing wrong. Why should your appeal be accepted?: Let's start by quoting the rule of Deathmatching: 14. Deathmatch (DM) ● Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player or their property without a proper roleplay reason. As you may see, Deathmatching is attacking others without reason. Now the question comes, what was the reason for my attack on this person? An Officer reported this being the vehicle that ran him over. The vehicle decided to park in the middle of an ongoing shootout, which, itself is a pretty silly idea. Did my character have reason to open fire? Yes. Post any evidence or further details: It's DM when you shoot someone, knowing they did nothing wrong. But this situation is worst case an IC mistake, no Deathmatch.
  14. MrSix

    FeaRP + NonRP

    Player(s) being reported: ID 247 Date of interaction reported: 9/04/2019 Unix time stamp from HUD: 1554842331 Your characters name: Mike Adams Other player(s) involved: Phillipe Sanchez - Pavel Reznikov - Alex Keller Specific rule(s) broken: 13. Fear Roleplay (FRP) ● Fear roleplay is the concept of roleplaying fear for your character’s safety and life. 9. Non-Roleplay (NRP) ● Actions that are unrealistic or promote poor quality roleplay are considered as non-roleplay. How did the player break the rule(s)? Was held at gunpoint multiple times and ordered to leave his vehicle. Refused doing so, although the engine was stalled. After shots were fired he kept refusing. Evidence of rule breach: The video contains confidential information. (Staff chat) please contact me on Discord for the evidence.
×
×
  • Create New...