Jump to content

DrPathetic

Moderator
  • Posts

    579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

478 Excellent

About DrPathetic

  • Rank
    Community Regular
    Community Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

2,445 profile views
  1. big thanks to @Pujdo for the new masterpiece to my signature!
    6vX0eko.png
     @Kris

    1. Pujdo

      Pujdo

      Mpache Designs (pattent pending)

  2. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Ben_Rosewarne (3) - Punishments for FearRP & Metagaming From the footage given, it can be seen you decided to ignore the fact the person tried to RP cuffing you and was still likely a threat to you after having a gun at you point blank range. This shows lack of care for your characters life. It can also be heard through your microphone that someone who was observing the situation told you to "run to the bus" which changed the outcome of the RP scenario so you will also be getting a Metagaming punishment. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support Andreasman1234 Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  3. PLAYER REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― Thank you for your patience while this report has been under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): From the supplied evidence it is difficult to know whether the demands given were audible to the reported party due to the reporting party whispering. At the point where he definitely would have heard you, the gun was already out (even though it didn't look like it was taken out until after he passed you, he wouldn't have been able to roll passed you unless it was out). I am going to give the reported party the benefit of the doubt with this scenario. The scenario also did not change outcome from this incident as he still died and you still got his items and weapon. I advise you keep note of what voice range you're set at as whispering/normal/shout is proximity, not volume, so speaking louder had no effect on whether he'd have been able to hear. As for the crouching, We have reviewed the footage and what is seen here is definitely not what has been displayed in the past, he was crouching for a fraction of a second and was regular strafing for the rest, it appears to be a simple mistake and not abuse like in the video mentioned. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. This report is now locked and archived. Regards, Senior Moderator DrPathetic & Senior Support Harveyyy
  4. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Ceez_Guzman (20) - Punishments for FearRP From the footage given, it can be seen you completely disregarded the instructions given to you when you were under gunpoint and elected to keep attempting to start your vehicle and drive off. This is a breach of the FearRP rule and shows a disregard for your characters life. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support Yputi Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  5. Public records being available would be a neat addition to be honest, to both civilian and criminal rp. Or at least on a by-request basis handled by the government but I think that'd be more of an IC thing anyway. There might need to be a little script support for this but I think we could probably get something like this made available if gone through the government so I'd personally recommend going through those channels to see if it's something they're interested in doing. Overall +1
  6. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Vincent_Diaz (28) - Punishments for NonRP From the footage given, it can be seen you are robbing someone who, at the time, was a new player. This is a direct violation of Rule 15. One cannot steal from players with NEW PLAYER above their head unless they have deliberately taken part in an active crime scene in which protection is temporarily lost. And since there was no demonstration of any crim being committed by the new player you are receiving this punishment. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support Ramo Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  7. PLAYER REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― Thank you for your patience while this report has been under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached, we have decided to deny this report for a variety of reasons I'll explain below: I'd like to start this explanation off by talking about the initial demands by Samuel_Colonna: "Do not move or you get shot" & "You get out, we open fire". These initial blanket demands were highly unrealistic coming from a cop in the middle of public, no real law enforcement would threaten to gun down people for the sole reason of exiting a building. Whether you actually intended to shoot or not would have been IC of course but these demands are not valid in terms of the FearRP accusations as none of the individuals inside the bank were under direct danger when they were being shouted. These demands had one purpose, to stop people leaving the bank because it was clear that if they came out, they severely outnumbered you and had an advantage. Generic demands given to a crowd like this just hinder any choices being made from those inside and giving demands to a crowd of people is just not valid. Secondly, I'd like to talk about why you issued these blanket demands at 11 people in the first place. In Ace_Rellet's statement he spoke about how you were surveying the area when witnessing suspicious activity and then witnessed the 9 (actually 11) bikes pull up and begin the robbery. At this stage they had no idea you were there and instead of waiting for the backup that was called, 2 of you went in severely outnumbered in hope to place them all under FearRP at the same time to halt the robbery and whilst instigating the situation. This was a poor IC decision that you then paid for by all of them running out at the same time and taking advantage of how much they outnumber you. If there was more police outside then more people would have been placed under FearRP and the situation might have gone more like you hoped. Thirdly, the second set of demands over VoiP. These demands issued by the reporting party at closer range, directly to people, were indeed valid. And the people they were valid to acknowledged this and complied appropriately. In fact, someone returned to the scene specifically for that. Overall, this was not a breach of FearRP and in a situation where it was effectively 2 PD officers (as Ace was late, very far back, and not issuing any demands to anyone that could hear) vs 11 gang members robbing a bank, you were lucky to get the 4 people you did and to expect the group to not take advantage of their only way out and their numbers is an unfair expectation. The initial demands given portray a very poor win-fast mentality that limits roleplay and I hope to not see them come up again in a situation to make up for under-preparing and not waiting for backup. As for the claims made by the reported parties about LSPD 'camping' the bank, It is clear they witnessed unusual activity from your group and acted accordingly to keep surveying the area to see why members were scouting the bank. Also, the shots fired were not an issue and appear to just be a sync issue as nobody was shot at. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. This report is now locked and archived. Regards, Sr Moderator DrPathetic, Sr Support Arrta & Sr Support NotMattch
  8. +1 If that's too much then maybe each month you have vip you get a new walk style for free would be pretty neat
  9. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [Notified In-Game] - Vincent_Diaz (28) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any evidence that you may have. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Senior Moderator DrPathetic
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.