Jump to content

sickyy

Member
  • Posts

    191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

163 Excellent

About sickyy

  • Rank
    Rookie
    Rookie

Recent Profile Visitors

3,373 profile views
  1. Hello, Frank Gurino here and I would like to thank Ramo and Kat for reviewing this report. First of all, I want to begin by clarifying that me and the reporting party (Asuna) are both good friends oocly and this is a big a misunderstanding between both of the sides but let me give you my side of the story. I was never told to save any POV neither informed that I’d get reported for this situation. Me, Lisa Gurino and Jonas Gurino, all three of us came to the event to have fun and entertain ourselves as well as other people. We were going around talking to people and interacting with multiple individuals. An hour or two in, I notice Lisa getting beaten up by an individual in orange which me and Jonas start running towards instantly which happened to be Asuna, the same individual who is making the report. In front of my eyes she gets injured and before that she was getting disrespected by the same individual so me and Jonas start following him and throw some punches. Afterwards, after BLS was given to Lisa, we secured her to the hospital. We brought her to pillbox MD so she could get the medical treatment and came back to the event. The whole process took under 10 minutes and we were back at the event. Then, I noticed the same individual that injured my wife. Keep in mind, me and Asuna are friends and it is just unfortunate that he did not manage to recognize me, I decided to do something stupid just to bait out a reaction and laugh from it because I thought Asuna knew who I was, therefore I never thought he would be upset about the situation as only few moments ago we were laughing during our previous RP encounter. I decided to reverse and hit him with the car solely just to bait a reaction which I do recognize as a violation of the server rules that lay under VDM as I reversed and aimed straight for him. However, I would have never committed any of such actions if I knew it was anyone else but him since we had prior interactions which still led me into having DM rights on him, however, this was not done with the intention to kill anyone, just a bump to bait a reaction as I’ve said previously. After that I decided to go around and circle the garage and momentarily afterwards I hit Asuna once again but this time it was actually unintentional unlike the first time. I think I treated this situation poorly and could have at least apologized and say it was an accident oocly but I never thought all of these occurrences could have ruined the experience for the reporting party as I assumed Asuna knew who I was, therefore I was acting casual while committing these actions. I do understand that perhaps it was some sort of oversight on my part on an OOC level. If I knew that it would break Jay Asuna’s immersion or ruin any RP I wouldn’t have done it. After some time had passed, I decided to reach out to Asuna and inquire him about the whole situation between us oocly just to realize a forum report had been made which I felt confused about so I asked about it. It turned out that he did not know that the person he reported was me. At that point I understood why the report was made as if someone that he didn’t know and committed all of these actions would look bad, however, we laughed about the situation, I apologized and, furthermore, we discussed it thoroughly and shortly came to the conclusion to drop the report as during the entire situation no one experienced any loss as in the meantime Asuna was never injured or lost any items apart from some health damage which he was not bothered about at all. If this report happened to be taken till the end and, worst scenario, accepted, it would be my second violation of DM rules as I received my first Deathmatching punishment when I still was fairly new in the server and didn’t have much experience over a year ago meaning that I would be permanently banned. Worst case scenario if that happens to be the final decision, I hope for leniency as I’ve been playing the server for quite some time now and the last punishment of such kind was a very long time ago. I apologize for the inconveniences caused throughout the situation as well as the time that was lost analyzing this report. -Frank
  2. Hello, ID 60 here. Everything is well said in Enzo's response. As we were raiding the place and found items that were irrelevant to us we dropped them on the ground. I never placed anything on the ground on purpose and I believe the only items I had dropped were a couple of briefcases that happened to be in rooms that were not approached by anyone meaning it did not cause any harm what so ever. We desired and asked for equipment to open the locked safes like thermites but we got rejected. We were discussing other alternatives but we couldn't think of much and in the middle of this all of you decided to rush in which resulted in all of you dying.
  3. I trully believe you are confusing me with the player Frank Fog because I have no clue how can I be notorious for breaking this rule. Before it started snowing, I was always driving Haikuchou Drag and only then decided started hopping into cars and since then I only participated in two shootouts (including this one) while there have been drive-by actions involved so I am more than confused with the accusations. That is just a pure exaggeration from his or his allies' side.
  4. Hello, ID 114 here! I would like to thank GiorgosK for taking care of this report. First of all, I‘d like to take responsibility for the second entrance back to the lab as well as stalling while in the car which is the main purpose of this report. I also encouraged the passenger to shoot even though it was a poor decision. Because of these actions, one member of the opposite gang was severely injured and the other one badly hurt. The plan was to enter, drive-by a little and then get out of the vehicle to continue the shootout but that was cancelled as SD were close. However, it ended with me coming back two times and stopping when it was too late. I only realized that I broke the rule whenever I left the lab and we had a conversation with the passenger OOCly after the situation ended so this is why I tried contacting the opposite side in order to apologize and try to resolve the situation OOCly afterwards. The situation was resolved with Valentina Guadalupe (ID 151) and Arabella Guadalupe (ID 115) and they decided to drop the report. However, the person who is the author of the report, still decided to use their POV even though it was resolved and they are ok with it (2nd POV https://streamable.com/b67jz3). I also want to address the fact that the player, who is creating the report, got hurt only during the first entrance which was clean apart from the tiny stall and was never affected during the second entrance. The people that got affected by the second entrance decided to drop the report after a conversation OOCly as previously mentioned before. I hope that the staff members who are handling this report will take in the consideration the fact that the last time I broke a server rule happened more than half a year when I was still fairly new to the server and this is my first fall since then. My POV: https://streamable.com/c120ch
  5. Hello, ID 178 here! First of all, I‘d like to address the same argument that Marcel had presented in his response. It is natural to use text instead of VOIP during such scenarios especially if you don‘t have any enemies around you, therefore you are not under fear-rp and it most definetely happens during most shootouts and I do not recognize a big issue. If I spammed maybe I could consider it to be a an action of breaking the rules, however, it didn‘t happen. I do comprehend the fact that using /s in the same scenario is a rule-break but I have never been told nor I have seen anywhere written that using text while injured is a rule-break. In addition, there is a POV of a similar situation of a shootout that happened not even that long ago. At the end of the videos people that are injured using text to ask BLS even though they are not in range to be heard using VOIP. Does that mean it's a rule-break? Absolutely no, it is completely natural and, as I have mentioned before, it happens in most if not all big scale shootouts. https://streamable.com/z9i1mm and https://streamable.com/nj232v (1:24)
  6. Hello! Frank Gurino here. Why did you bring an illegal weapon on yourself into an NCZ and to discuss illegal activity and bag's content, as suspected to have illegal items, inside the NCZ? I was in pursuit of the player that was carrying the bag, we had their radio frequency for a very long time listening in onto what they were doing. It came to all of our conclusion that they were either robbing a bank/store or picking up an illegal drop. We knew it had illegal and good value inside, I did not expect myself for them to go inside a NCZ so I simply followed in to see what were they planning to do and gather evidence OOCly to post a player report as it was clearly a breach of NCZ rule. What was your plan behind asking the party to show their bag content? Did you see them heading to a drop location to pursue such allegations? As I mentioned previously, I wanted to see for myself and to collect evidence that the player did infact have illegal items inside a NCZ and they were using OOC protection to protect themself from me and my allies from getting robbed. I mentioned before that we had possesion of their radio frequency, which we were listening to for about an hour or even more.
  7. Hello! I was involved in this particular situation so I will just provide my POV to give a better comprehension of what happened here. https://streamable.com/iv3x69
  8. Hello, Frank Gurino here. (ID 287). https://streamable.com/a98r15 In my POV it is obvious that as we were approaching the enemy group, demands were shouted and given by three individuals to them. I fired my first bullet whenever I noticed a foe aim a pistol at my allies which gave me DM rights and from then on the shootout begin. Since at that point the shootout had already been active I continued to shoot the enemies. I fired at the second guy as he was shooting people from my group and then at Sarah because I knew she was an enemy. At first I didn‘t see her with hands up but as I was approaching her and getting closer I then noticed that she was complying to our given demands and instantly stopped. The rest is just footage of an active shootout and them not listening to our demands. In addition, I contacted Sarah to ask whether she was affected by my performed actions. She told me that, according to her, I did nothing wrong and that it did not affect her what so ever and that it was not act of DM. In case of any extra concerns, let me know.
  9. sickyy

    Los Santos Triads

    Appreciate every moment spent here, the people met and epic moments that had occurred. Nothing lasts forever and I am glad I had the chance to be part of this Family. Much love
  10. Everything is done so precisely, video is trully magnificent. Let's hope the quality of this thread transfers to the quality of your roleplay. Best of luck in the future.
  11. Hello, I was casually driving when a money transporter vehicle crashed into my vehicle. I was furious about it, I lost the guy who crashed into me. I started driving crazy around the town just to find the guy. I go towards the money transporter headquarters, wait for a short period of time and I notice a guy with his money transporter vehicle crashed, him laying on the ground waiting for medics. I assumed this was the guy so I took him. I carried him because I wanted to check his belongings but the medics were already on the way so I decided to kill him so he doesn't scream or drag any attention what so ever. If this was an act of DM then I'm sincerely sorry as such situations appear quite rarely on my roleplay scenarios. EDIT: Now that I look at this situation I realize that I could have warned him to be silent or to not scream or otherwise I'd do something to him and I apologize for such outcome.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.