Jump to content

YuSoHelpful

Moderator
  • Content Count

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

94 Excellent

About YuSoHelpful

  • Rank
    Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Sara_Stark [ID #73] - @Dre_Stark If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  2. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Kevin_Young [ID #78] - @Vcari Kevin_Huynh [ID #92] - @likekato If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  3. PLAYER REPORT DENIED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): I don't see a rule breach in this video. The man had a gun out and called over the radio, as per the Fear-RP rules: When you have a firearm drawn and are facing the other person before they attacked. He was not under Fear-RP, even though roleplay wise it might seem poor, it's not a rule breach and you had the right to shoot him. This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  4. No, this is posted for the first time. I heard another house in the area was listed for 1.000.000 indeed.
  5. My previous response is visible in his denied appeal. Pending Senior Admin+ review. Kind Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  6. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Matt_Trustson [ID #114] @BroskiBen - Deathmatching - Offense #1 - As per our current Deathmatching rule, you did not have a valid reason to attack them at the moment. You didn't initiate any roleplay and/or gave demands. You rammed the Contender using the Dubsta, which is a smaller vehicle (unrealistic). You then opened fire upon the man in the car, yet you have no valid reason to attack him. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  7. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Richard_Roberts [ID #69] - @Richard Roberts Deathmatch - Offense #1 Humphrey_Henry [ID #39] @jcgibby - Deathmatch - Offense #1 As of the current Deathmatching rules, which state the following: Examples of valid reasons to attack another player: • If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property. • If they report you to the police for a serious crime. • If they are not in compliance with demands, attempt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules. The officer was not under fear roleplay and thus did not have to obey any of the demands you made. He didn't "attempt" to arrest you or your ally. He simply stated the consequences for not backing up. He did not initiate an arrest procedure. Therefore this isn't a valid argument either. Both players will receive a Deathmatching punishment. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  8. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: Richard_Roberts [ID #69] - [Player will be notified in-game] Humphrey_Henry [ID #39] - [Player will be notified in-game] If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  9. Okay. I'm just trying to see what the offers are, I know what I paid and the offers are not interesting to me at this time. Isn't that the thing with bidding? You bid and see if your offer gets accepted? But if you're not interested in the house you can skip the advertisement. I hope you find a nice house somewhere else. Have a lovely day.
  10. House has not been sold yet, I'm not in a rush and I haven't seen a price to my liking as of yet.
  11. @Flucifial I'm unsure if a response is needed to both sides or just Corey's side. Because @SkuLLar is permanently banned and his initial report was closed. Corey however copy pasted it. (It's edited now so it seems to be written from his perspective) His appeal is however still open and awaiting review. _____________________________ Onto the actual report. First of all I'd like to state, I do not have a problem with anyone in the community. Also I have never favoured anyone in a report. I've punished people I've known for a while because they broke the rules. I have also declined and reported multiple incidents of people asking me to remove a punishment for the fact they know me and they think because of that I will make their punishments go away. Topic bumping. Placing a . on your appeal, which is awaiting review is in my eyes considered topic bumping. Multiple reports get locked for such. I don't see what I've done wrong here. In the Punishment Appeal Requirements it clearly states the following: Wait patiently, some appeals may be answered quickly and others require investigation and review that can take time. Therefore I feel locking the topic, awaiting review from a Senior Admin+ is entirely justified. As I see no reason to post a . on your appeal. The @SkuLLar report. My reasoning as can be seen in the report says it all in my opinion. You were unable to give proper demands by saying "hands" in a way where he had no possibility to hear you. I've tested this with a Support member. You said hands very calmly and normal. If you'd have raised your voice the other party could've heard you, but you were still at a reasonable range. The @CoreyAizyy report. You've tried to appeal the outcome of the report you're writing about. Your appeal was denied as my ruling was deemed correct. Therefore I wonder if this is to be considered an actual report against me, or an attempt at another Appeal on your report. The screenshot used in this report and the appeal show the man further away from when the demand was actually given. In the actual report (linked below) you will see a screenshot posted by me from the point where demands were given. As can be seen below, this quite differs from the screenshot posted in both the report and the appeal. I believe this might not been doen by you intentionally, but I'd like to make this clear. The demands were given with a loud voice, in contrast to Skullar's report, the "robber" used a loud voice instead of al almost whispering voice. I've tested this with a Support member and he could be heard properly. This + your actions as stated in your denied punishment appeal, in my eyes, justifies the punishment issued. If any further reasoning or explanation is required, please inform me. Kind Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  12. @GWXCORE I would like to know if there's any further evidence towards the report. Possibly showing the previous interaction between both parties. I've discussed this report and feel like there's not enough context to the report to issue a punishment at this time. If there is any, please post it. If not, please reply to this topic stating so aswell. Kind Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  13. @GiorgosK The first clip was handled by me in-game and was resolved by restarting the RP. Therefore this should not be included in the report at all. Please do remove this part from your report. Also since the report is against a staff member. The report will be pending a senior admin+ Kind Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  14. @BroskiBen I would like to know if you have any footage of your prior interaction? Also I would like an explanation of why you rammed a Contender with a Dubsta. Kind Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
  15. PLAYER REPORT ACCEPTED Thank you for your patience while this report was under review. After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following players: Woken_Cox [ID #243] @Woken - Metagaming - Offense #1 - See the statement below. Jessica_Brown [ID #124] @arcangel - Metagaming - Offense #1 - See the statement below. Aj_White [ID #42] @ShreddShark - Metagaming - Offense #1 - See the statement below. You relayed IC information OOCly and you used this information ICly. It is admitted in the part above. If you hadn't known the above, there is no way to tell if you'd have stayed there or not. You based your actions on the OOC information and decided to stay and wait since you already knew OOCly what was going on. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Moderator YuSoHelpful
×
×
  • Create New...