Cyrus Raven

I have received an offer currently for a monthly rate of 40,000$ per month. Anyone with an Office space to rent out monthly or outright sell, please be aware I will be finalizing on a deal by the end of next week (10th September) so kindly send your offers by then. Additional information for sellers. There is currently 1.500.000$ allocated for an Office. Anyone looking to sell their Office for more, I will sadly be unable to consider your offer. However, if you are interested in renting it out, feel free to send me an offer with a suggested rate. For those renting, please be aware that to be considered, you must not have any active Law Enforcement agreements to access the property. (e.g Outside of normal procedures such as 911 calls, search warrants, etc...your property must not have any agreements which enable Law Enforcement to freely enter the premises)

Sent you a reply!

I am glad to hear that is the case!

I am interesting in doing a visiting and knowing more information on rent, security, etc... Please text me at your earliest convenience

Do you know who is the registered owner? If he's able to text me it would be great.

Tempting, but I hear the mayor of grapeseed is a pain in the ass to deal with. I'm looking for something more central.

Looking for an Office, ideally located close to city hall or general downtown Los Santos. Please contact me via text on 5356160 or via government email at [email protected] ((GOV PM)) with the relevant address and price of sale or rent rate.

Original Open Letter HERE. My patience is running out on this subject, this will be the final time I address allegations with no evidence attached. The letter by John Wallace echoes the vitriol him and his department have felt for myself and the Judicial Branch since I launched a criminal investigation against him. An open letter which seeks to blend facts with fiction to fit a narrative after a joint investigation by the State's largest Law Enforcement agencies failed to yield any charges in relation to the murder of a Government Director seven months ago, despite my open cooperation on the matter. There is no direct evidence of any involvement of mine with any criminal organization. Anyone claiming otherwise is basing themselves on rumours, circumstantial evidence and the delusional conspiracies concocted by individuals who dislike me. John can certainly seek assistance from his Legal Affairs Division on the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence. John mentioned I was ''financially tied to Vince Williams and the Cartel''. Allow me to clarify. I was a Public Defence Attorney for the Judicial Branch before becoming the Attorney General, during my time as a Defence Attorney I was occasionally compensated for my performance in court cases, this was neither required nor requested from my end, as I've always made clear. None the less, some of my clients, Mr. Williams included, rewarded the time and effort I put into their cases, this is perfectly legitimate and in line with the Code of Ethics. This is why I voluntarily provided my bank records. While running for the Law Review Committee (LRC), I received campaign donations, these never came with a promise for any favours or influence over my decisions, instead the donation was made by Mr. Williams and another individual who wished to see business owners represented in the LRC. I ran for the LRC partially because of my pro-business positions, this is a matter of Public Record. I reported this campaign donation to Chief of Staff Emily Whitehorse. The claim that I manage businesses for the cartel is laughable. I am listed as a manager for a 24/7, who is a subsidiary of a parent company the Los Santos Sheriff's Department believes is connected to a criminal organization. I do not manage any business, neither day to day operations nor finances. I do not receive any income from any businesses. I do not deal with any licensing for any businesses. What the manager position allows me to do is to place the occasional blip with Weazel News in case the owner, a friend of mine, is out of town, I have done so one single time. When you dig deeper, the claim that I am ''financially tied to Vince Williams and the Cartel'' is meaningless. A sentence made to convey some impropriety, unethical or even criminal behaviour from my part. The reality is much more boring and simpler, Mr. Williams was a client and a campaign donor, that's it. Any allegations regarding a criminal organization named ''the Cartel'' is beyond my knowledge. Lastly, it's sad I am forced to say this, but in response to ''being financially dependent on them is a clear violation of any and all ethics they claim to uphold and an immense conflict of interest.'' I am wealthy. I don't need money nor do I depend on anyone, including my previous employer, to make a living. In fact, I created a charitable foundation exactly because I have too much of it doing nothing and I thought I might as well try and help people. Yes, you have. High-Ranking members of both the Los Santos Police Department and the Los Santos Sheriff's Department met with Governor Langley directly after Sheriff Kirk was informed that deliberately concealing information from a Government Official conducting a lawful investigation into John is a crime. Less than 48 hours later I was unilaterally placed on Administrative Leave by the same Governor, this is AFTER two independent Judges lawfully denied search warrants for my phone and bank records. This is the definition of obstruction of justice, bringing bogus allegations based on rumours and completely legal, ethical and fully justified financial transactions. John is lying. Supreme court Justices do not investigate criminal matters, that is why you have Law Enforcement and the Prosecution Division. What Judges do is take an objective look at evidence provided and make rulings based on the evidence and the evidence alone. John is mistakenly under the impression that a denied search warrant is a ''refusal to investigate'', showing a clear lack of basic understanding of our legal system and the roles within. It is their duty to uphold the constitution and our legal system. However, when Law Enforcement are denied Search Warrants for legitimate legal reasons, we get a glimpse at their true nature, instantly appealing to the Governor on matters the Judicial has a final say on. This is ironic considering the previous point of the meetings between SD, PD and GOV. After I was placed on leave, a Bar Ethics Review Board investigation was conducted, part of this process was meeting with the Associate Justice about the reason for my leave, which I was owed an explanation for. I was not informed of any search warrants, I guessed it. I was asked if I would voluntarily provide Law Enforcement my bank logs and phone records, to which I immediately told Associate Justice Daniels that I would, but that I felt uneasy about the entire situation and suspected this request was only being asked of me as a way to circumvent a denied search warrant. This was later confirmed in a meeting where Governor Langley was present. Once more, John makes accusations which hold no water. Please take some medication, this sounds straight out of an InfoWars episode, although given John's history with sexist comments I would not be surprised if he frequents such alternative media. I invite John to post any evidence he has of any of the accusations being made. If John doesn't you know he's lying. Once more, a blatant lie. John wanted to proactively breach the Attorney-Client privilege by asking for phone records containing legally protected exchanges between a Lawyer and an Attorney. Obviously, these were denied. I guess to John it doesn't really matter, laws? rights?, who needs those am I right? No and no, once more, no evidence, please post any and all evidence you have, if John doesn't, he's lying. John and Sheriff Kirk are both mistaken. Our Law Enforcement Agencies are government entities, specifically tasked with upholding the law. You are not a private entity, you are not a citizen, you are a government Law Enforcement organization of which the Attorney General is the highest ranking official. Any and all requests for evidence pertaining to a criminal investigation which are in possession of the Los Santos Sheriff's Department must be handed over upon request. I once again remind you of our penal code entry for GM14 - Obstruction of Justice. ''If any person interferes, delays, obstructs, lies or deliberately conceals information from law enforcement officers or any other government official that is conducting a lawful investigation and/or questioning then they are to be regarded as obstructing justice.'' Unlike the 5th Amendment, which gives the Citizens of Los Santos the right against self-incrimination and the 4th Amendment which shields them from unlawful searches and seizures, no such exception exists for entities, especially not government entities, including Internal Affairs files or other files which the Los Santos Sheriff's Department might consider confidential. If there is a good legal basis (probable cause) to believe evidence of a crime is contained in such documents, they can be requested under threat of criminal charges. None the less, while the threat was made, a search warrant was also submitted. Sadly I was not able to follow up on it considering I was placed on Administrative Leave a few hours after. This signals the start of what will be yet another witch hunt, this time against Chief Justice Judith Mason and Associate Justice Colt Daniels. I am no longer a public official and despite my prior position, please consider this response my own and not representative of the views of the Judicial Branch, Chief Mason or Associate Justice Daniels. It is with this that I conclude my response with the following: I consent to any and all releases of information from any government agency. Either charge me or shut the fuck up.

At least we agree on this. I don't think we disagree, my broader point is that actions taken should be based on IRL counterparts, there is always a balance to reach between IRL and a game, while I would personally prefer a focus on slightly more serious/hardcore RP, I understand that's something only a handful of people want versus the other hundreds who are ok with a more medium-light RP environment. None the less, there is room even in a light-medium RP server to achieve this balance. If you're a Detective, it's probably a good idea to read some basic interrogation tactics used by IRL Detectives as many do. If you're an Attorney it's probably a good idea to know the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause. If you're an EMT it's cool to be able to show Medical RP that reflects basic known treatments IRL. (small simple stuff you can google in 20 seconds like knowing how to secure a bone fracture).

RP experience in any position means exactly 0 if you're not basing your actions on your IRL counterparts, thus the ''role'' in roleplay.

I won't say the warrant system is perfect, but trust me when I say that raids would be worse if there was no oversight from JB. However, this also means that if you're getting raided from an approved search warrant, there is more than plenty IC probable cause to justify the raid. I don't understand what some of you mean when you say Detectives are OOC'ly targetting you, the more simple answer is that they've interacted with you IC'ly, put work into evidence gathering, built a case and executed a warrant based on all of that RP they've likely spent hours on. How hard or easy their job is solely depends on how smart of a criminal player you are. There are ways to get around it.

Increase fishing payout to match hourly pay in Road Worker, ideally this would be achieved by leaving the price of fish the same. However, the pier and immediate surroundings would yield x2 more fish (or however much is needed to compete with the hourly income the Road Worker job yields) Purpose of this suggestion would be to bring back a community spot people can hang out in while also getting paid.

Imo, Civ RP isn't about the ''normie'' things as you put it, it's about engaging in Roleplay that is outside of the normal Cops vs Robbers dichotomy. I don't think Civ RPers need to first show a commitment to buying groceries RP'ly or RP'ing going to sleep before being able to ask for script support for a basic business bank accounts, the same way I wouldn't feel it's reasonable to expect criminals to RP cooking drugs, chopping cars, getting imports before justifying implementing these as script features. Being a Civ RPer does not mean being an NPC concerned with the most boring and mundane tasks, there's a balance to be had imo, probably not the best use of resources to focus on stuff like item generation until the events/restaurant/retail RP scene picks up more steam instead of being a flavour of the week type of deal, but there should be broader support for suggestions that will impact everyone (e.g. business bank accounts, business F4 menu) which will hopefully pave the way for that type of RP.

-1 Reviewing footage is investigation, besides if the crime is of a complex nature then reviewing body-cam doesn't necessarily mean an open and shut case, if you find yourself being caught several times because someone has reviewed footage, chances are that you're not committing crimes in the most intelligent way possible, which is fine, but understandably comes with an easier to prove case, that's just the way the cookie crumbles. I can not imagine the unbearable work load LEOs would have if they had to collect statements for something easily proven by rewinding some footage, whether it be actually checking the footage or through /do /ldo investigative RP. I would like to see a body-cam item that gives others some sort of warning that a player has a body-cam equipped. Although this can already be done through /do RP, I feel like a visible item or some other method of announcing to others around you that you have one on would be a cool feature.

Enjoy it! SOLD

Price changed

In about an hour I'll fly in and change it

I don't do cash transactions. If you can bring your offer up to 620k @ the door then it is yours

I'll keep that in mind. I'm looking for a bit more than 570.

Still available

No reason in specific, price is negotiable, offers can be sent to 5356160, it is open for viewing

bump

Yes, you can also build on the alley itself and the roof. This property is good for those who want a private garage with locked gates.