Jump to content

DetectiveStone

Donator
  • Content Count

    107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

DetectiveStone last won the day on May 31

DetectiveStone had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

129 Excellent

6 Followers

About DetectiveStone

  • Rank
    Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

587 profile views
  1. In the US, sure you don't need a concealed carry license to buy a hunting rifle, but this is still GTA, this is a game. People will camp gun stores, people will camp hunting grounds. There would be no stopping criminals from just adapting to robbing hunters. Adding more shotguns into the server would be more chaos. They should already be difficult to obtain because of how much damage they do. I hear you when you say there are law abiding citizens, I think a Musket or something like that could be more appropriate, maybe one that did less damage to players and more to animals. Im here for the RP, I'm not so greedy as to want people to go through me to get their weaponry. I think it is fair though, to assume that adding shotguns to legals would have a large impact on how illegals get weapons of that caliber.
  2. Big -1 from me Coming from a criminal standpoint I find it very unfair to all the Official Factions that had to work to be able to import weapons like shotguns. Hunting rifles are indeed sold at basically any super store in the U.S., i.e. Walmart, but in terms of the server I strongly believe that would have a negative impact on the Quality of Life. Even if licensed legal individual could purchase them, it would be still be abused and more likely than not, result in terrible change in the Criminal vs. PD that tends to bring out that type of weaponry. Civilians in this server should not be able to purchase shotguns. The ability to have a legal shotgun would make the job for PD/SD more difficult, imagine trying to find out whether it's use for Hunting or criminal activities, there'd be no way of knowing their intention. Even if this were to be implemented, you basically put Civilians on the same weaponized level as PD, SD, and major gangs, at that point, it would only be fair if the arsenal that the Official Factions import from gets expanded as well.
  3. Excited to see this develop! Best of luck!
  4. You did not comply with demands which is why the report was made. I see where you're coming from when you say that you died and didn't effect the scenario afterwards, but truth be told, you were given demands by Lu Wong, for roughly 6 seconds, you look around confused, after you holster your weapon you then run, instead of putting your hands up. As seen in Pete's video. Your rule break along with ID 165 caused the shootout, had you both complied, no shots would've been fired, and you would've saved yourself a report. Thank you for realizing that ID 165 did in fact make the wrong decision by pulling out his gun whilst being surrounded by shotguns. I understand this completely, but yet again, the truth of the matter is that you're in TAC-1, and that does not justify your inability to Fear RP properly. All in all I cannot apologize to you, as you've disrespected our faction with baseless claims and harsh words. I am sorry, however, that you have to deal with this report because of your own actions. P.S. Sorry @alexalex303 for replying after you told us to edit, I was in the middle of drafting the reply when you posted yours, and felt justified in replying to his harsh reply myself
  5. Please don't think that this report is personal or made out of spite. I understand one can be cluttered with TAC1/Radio comms, but the truth of the matter is, Lu Wong came directly at you with intent to harm. He had a weapon drawn ready to kill you if you didn't comply. Which you didn't. Per the rules, you should've realistically had fear for you life. Along with the other officers on the scene. Running around in confusion because you're used to hearing MrSilky's voice is understandable, but you must accept the fact that you did not comply with the demands given. You nor ID 165. I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this statement, since YOU were the one breaking Fear RP and ruining what could've been an interesting RP scenario. Your perception of the Los Santos Triads comes from a place of ignorance, I'm afraid, as many would attest that we have some of the BEST RP within the criminal world in ECRP. I understand you're frustrated, as you think you had done me a favor by granting me Death RP. I as well understand that Death RP is a privilege, in this case however, I personally think it would've been UNREALISTIC to deny it, regardless of it being a privilege. You had T-Boned my bike at high speed, when I didn't have a helmet on. My flying across the pavement and slamming the curb was 100% going to kill me IRL, if not completely paralyze and or render me a vegetable, as you said. You had stopped giving me medical roleplay for some time actually, as I say in /do multiple times, 5 minutes had passed, 10 minutes had passed etc. I believe you had plenty of time to comply to their demands, since you were not actively providing me medical attention.
  6. I’ll do 200k and an invite to the Los Santos Triads
  7. Player(s) being reported: ID 165 and 209 Date of interaction reported: 9-17-2019 Unix time stamp from HUD: 1568757954 Your characters name: Nick Wong Other player(s) involved: Pete Wright @Pistol Pete, Lu Wong @Farmzy Specific rule(s) broken: 13. Fear Roleplay (FRP) Fear roleplay is the concept of roleplaying fear for your character’s safety and life. Examples (but not limited to), where your character’s life is considered to be in direct danger: • When you are on foot or bike and a weapon is aimed at you at close range. • When you’re in a vehicle that is stalled or turned off and a weapon is aimed at you close range. • When the attacker lowers their weapon to type or roleplay, your life remains in direct danger. • Driving a vehicle in an active shootout more than once without the intent of protecting a friend, fleeing with it, or using it as cover. Examples (but not limited to), where your character’s life is NOT considered to be in direct danger: • When you are in a car which engine is not stalled. • When you have a firearm drawn and are facing the other person before they attacked. • When the attacker’s view is obstructed by an object or when they turn their back on you. As a victim, whose life is in direct danger: • You must display reasonable value for your life and comply with the demands of your attacker. • You cannot call 911 or call your friends or allies to aid you. How did the player break the rule(s)? ID 209 and ID 165 ignored demands while being aimed at close range with a lethal weapon. ID 165 proceeds to pull out his gun and fire back, when hes in direct LoS by Lu Wong with a shotgun. Evidence of rule breach: https://streamable.com/q3xxl
  8. Huge +1 As simple as it sounds, the MDC is IC, so only IC info should be given. Another huge issue with typing in the ID, is being unable to report the abuse of it. Anyone who’s committing crimes should RPly only be given charges if: A: They aren’t wearing a mask and are identifiable by a law enforcement B: Their license is taken from them by a law enforcement officer C- Their prints are found at the scene of a crime on a murder weapon with the use of /LDO (still kind of meh, as IRL, it would’ve inconclusive without more proof) Many criminals have probably experienced receiving charges inexplicably, I think removing the ability to search someone’s identity with the MDC using OOC measures is a huge improvement to the quality of the RP between Crims/PD. ps... still waiting on the Judicial Faction!!!!
  9. duh 2gee been duh sold, duh wan gee is stil fo sayl at wan fity (150k)
  10. Glad you found it alright! Thanks for the swift business!
  11. Literally walking distance to LSC, other mechanics are neighbors as well!
×
×
  • Create New...