Jump to content

MrWonanother

Senior Administrator
  • Posts

    1,159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

290 Excellent

About MrWonanother

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

3,548 profile views
  1. Thank you for the swift response, with that now in the open I will be voiding your punishment of Daniel Harry Regards, MrWonanother.
  2. Yo lad, I still appear to be banned in-game according the UCP... do I need to do anything? image.thumb.png.c8e75cc9c6f78e032d38c7d0c3b9ee2c.png

  3. @Liam Willis - Have you had any previous interaction with one of the players involved, Daniel_Harris during this day? If so, elaborate on said interaction.
  4. REPORT ACCEPTED After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided to accept this report and issue the following punishments: Chuck_Mori (ID 222): Deathmatching | Demands given to players in/on moving vehicles do not count as valid demands, and so, you cannot gain DM rights from them. As well of course, as said by yourself, the demands that you did give were not demands in the first place. This situation should not have any shots fired at the reporting party as they did not act violently toward you, and valid demands were not given. Please be careful about your VoIP status in the future too. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Sr. Admin MrWonanother & Sr. Support Gaza
  5. Pending review from myself & @Gaz.
  6. Hello and thank you for the making this report - I've taken the time to watch over the the reporting parties footage and review the comments of those involved. and decided that this report will be denied for the following reasons. - The hostage was shot on scene. Axel_Sutherland was the individual responsible for shooting the hostage. He claims that the robber had a bugged animation, so he was under the impression that the robber was still alive and when he shot it ended up going through the robber and into the hostage. - Sadly the game isn't prefect the bugs to appear with animations when players are injured not showing for everyone around. - The demands from the officers was to keep the hostage inside, and not take him outside as they would attempt to escape. After they received the money, they suddenly gave demands that they were exiting out without pre-emptively saying so, so the situation was sort of rushed. The sniper asked the officers on scene if the hostage was close to any of the robbers, to which he was given the answer of "no" and that is when he waited for the one robber to get on the bike, before shooting down the other robber. - The hostage was given medical attention afterwards. He got secured. MDU prioritized the hostage as he was the victim of a misfire. - SD and those on scene followed the correct procedure following a shooting of a unarmed civilian caught in cross-fire. Overall the hostage taking and exit plan was rushed, snipers and officers are allowed to shoot when the aim is taken off of the hostage(s) in this case when one got onto the bike the other unlocked his bike to get onto it. All rules were followed during the entirety of the situation. Player report is denied and archived. Regards, MrWonanother.
  7. MrWonanother

    .

    Incorrect format - Archived.
  8. Those are some pogger stats not going to lie!
  9. REPORT ACCEPTED After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I appreciate all the honesty and your explanation to this report we have decided on the following. [Tony_Lucciano [ID #UNKOWN - [Deathmatching ] You attacked a player without any valid demands not even knowing who they were this is a complete and utter breach of our deathmatching rules, you must always give the demands and we are 100% sure that you have DM rights, you did not know the person you attacked you did not go up and confirm who they were you nearly just shot them from a far away place three times with a .50 pistol - never in the entirety of this server have we ever allowed a Hitman/bounty type rp where someone can offer up money to kill somebody else this is a direct breach of our rules. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Kind regards, Senior Administrator MrWonanother
  10. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: [Tony_Lucciano [ID #UNKOWN]] - [ @Masonc3434 ] Why did you shoot the reporting party three times in a populated area with seemingly no DM right and or any demands given. Please provide any and all video footage of the events in question and the moment leading up to it. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Senior Administrator MrWonanother.
  11. REPORT ACCEPTED After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I appreciate all the honesty and your explanation to this report we have decided on the following. [Hashim_Patel [ID #126 - [Deathmatching ] You attacked two players without them having provoked an attacked them insulting with words or things said in a heated discussion is not cause for you to attack them with a weapon, if you did have cause you would always have to provide valid and clear demands you cannot just attack because you want to, I would like you to take this time during your punishment to read our rules on deathmatching FOUND HERE ] If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Kind regards, Senior Administrator MrWonanother
  12. PLAYER REPORT PENDING RESPONSES Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, I have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. The following players will be required to provide their side of the story from this situation within the next twenty-four (24) hours: [Hashim_Patel [ID #126]] - [ @Mister Patel ] Why did you hit the reporting parties with seemingly no roleplay motive to do so. Do you feel your actions were justified by the serve rules if so please explain. Please provide any and all video footage of the events in question and the moment leading up to it. If the players above fail to respond to this report within the next twenty-four (24) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Senior Administrator MrWonanother.
  13. Request accepted & completed, this is now archived.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.