Diligo Posted January 2, 2025 Report Posted January 2, 2025 2 hours ago, tigerpet15 said: Also I believe there needs to be hostage rule implemented which would make others fear for their friends life and Leo’s fear for life of hostage. I actually suggested the aspect of "fearing for your friends life" but it wasnt well supported. Though fearing for the life of hostage is like the most realistic thing that happens in real life and if cops shoot through the doors and windows in hopes of taking out the robbers then that is truly unrealistic Quote
Clank Posted January 2, 2025 Report Posted January 2, 2025 10 hours ago, tigerpet15 said: Also I believe there needs to be hostage rule implemented which would make others fear for their friends life and Leo’s fear for life of hostage. Thats another huge issue altogether, players should be able to take anyone hostage as long as they have a valid reason to do so. If I need a hostage for a bank, I should be able to find one anywhere and kidnap them for the bank. Same goes for deathmatching. I have seen so many different directions when it comes to enforcing the deathmatching rule. Some staff will claim one thing and others will claim different. If you hold someone up, they refuse to listen - it only makes sense for you to be able to shoot them. Why can someone robbing me NOT shoot me if I do not listen to their demands. Why is it that I can talk mad shit to a hood mf and they're not allowed to shoot me. Quote
Diligo Posted January 2, 2025 Report Posted January 2, 2025 4 minutes ago, Clank said: Why is it that I can talk mad shit to a hood mf and they're not allowed to shoot me. I talk shit to the stupid alcoholics in my hood and they wouldnt shoot me, maybe hit me. Same reason serial killer DM is not allowed because shooting someone for talking shit is so incredibly stupid it is borderline unrealistic. And if it does happen, it is probably because there was previous beef. And there is no previous beef with someone if you got NLR`d it doesnt exist. So any new beef is NEW beef. No reason to shoot someone for a couple of words. Let it rest, G Quote
Demonmit1 Posted January 2, 2025 Author Report Posted January 2, 2025 this has ended up off topic and back to cops vs crim kinda stuff. try and focus on the original post, pros, cons, new ideas, etc. Quote
Quietthecutie Posted January 2, 2025 Report Posted January 2, 2025 Please keep your replies to this discussion relevant to the topic at hand. Quote
astrx Posted January 3, 2025 Report Posted January 3, 2025 If this topic continues to veer in the way that it is it will unfortunately have to be closed. Ensure that the replies are either a response to the original posters topic or an addition to it. There is no need for some of the comments going on here. If it continues forum warnings will be given out. Quote
LuciferSparrow Posted December 17, 2025 Report Posted December 17, 2025 +1 This is definitely something that requires more work to be done though, to better make it fair and balanced but I think it's 100% worth the consideration and lay out the ground work, I can surely say, Public Labs = Red Zone, Poor to negligible RP standards are carried out, Besides if gangs can put their tables freely in their territories it will give them more reason to stay within their turf bounds and not just actively roll public labs while spending bare minimum time at their home turf, Maybe this new system could be introduced in a way that official factions HAVE to place the tables within their turfs, And add limits to the tables they can put or maybe cost to it, Solos can RP with the gangs to cook at their turfs by giving them a cut or an accepted upfront cash in exchange for using the tables, Giving gang members a better use for their turf. Quote
