Jump to content

Ty Shipley

Member
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

26 Excellent

About Ty Shipley

  • Rank
    Apprentice
    Apprentice

Recent Profile Visitors

298 profile views
  1. Another screenshot of our discord DMs. Sorry for the excessive messages. Just presenting more evidence. And in response to @DaMasterSplinter, that's my clipping software broadcasting the sound twice. Thanks for the heads up, I'll get it sorted. Here is some evidence of it happening previously. https://streamable.com/zks6em https://streamable.com/1mojah
  2. Player(s) being reported: ID 174 and ID 121 Date of interaction reported: 06/AUG/2021 Unix time stamp from HUD: 158 | 1628217755 Your characters name: Ty_Shipley Other player(s) involved: Alessandra Bridge, Jameson Bridge. Specific rule(s) broken: 14. Deathmatch (DM) Prior interaction should include escalation such as a robbery or a report to the police. Players on foot should only be attempted to be hit with a vehicle once with valid motive. No demands given before the two people started initiating in deathmatching us. How did the player break the rule(s)? Driving down the road off Senora Freeway, then proceeding to drive down catfish view at an average speed of 130mph. As we are driving, we come across 3 people, in which we slow down at around 80mph to take a long glance. We attempt to implement a U turn as we now have information and reasonable suspicion Sealab is occupied. However whilst doing so, one of them in the blue proceeds to hold the weapon at us with no dialogue for a second or so. As we are driving away, he then proceeds to fire 3 bullets. This is when ID 121 - His allies - proceeds to fire two additional bullets (Following the progression of events caused by the rule break), and then the man in blue proceeds to fire a last bullet. Totaling at 6 shots being fired at our vehicle. The vehicle suffered two shots, both being on the back bumper above each tire, one on the right, one on the left. With all the bullets being shot exclusively by ID 121 and 174. In addition to this, I also have reasonable suspicion to believe he was being deceptive OOCLY. Discussing the matter with him, he said he needed a voice reset. In the video you cannot visibly see any Stranger IDs speaking (with the exception of a popup for a half second) whilst in proximity of the attacker in green, showcasing there is a good possibility he was silent whilst aiming the gun - there was no communication from him anyway. If he had difficulties operating voice chat he should've alerted his allies, or vice versa - his allies should've alerted him. Evidence of rule breach: Sadly, after requesting his footage, ID 174 informed me his "clips are corrupt 90% of the time." He offered to refund anything that was lost, which was nice of him, but nothing was lost with the exception of our vehicle integrity. Which just leaves the rule break as the topic at hand. Here is the footage I collected. *https://streamable.com/yxoabt* I would like to add, no clear apologies where made over the discord PMs, he just kept excusing his actions and justifying them by saying a cough was needed. I didn't mind the incident because i came out fine and unharmed with no real negative consequences other then our RP being ruined for a few mins. I think he should learn from this and next time make the right choices in a Role-Play server, because at the end of the day this is not a dm server.
  3. I never said that, read it again. I was stating it's an identifier to know who you was. Do you have proof of you trying to PM me? Just because you're trying to PM, it DOESN'T mean you get to pause RP and/or use it an excuse for circulating around, whilst being shot at... again, you turned up into an active shootout (you said yourself you had no way to know if your ally was down or not, so you was under the illusion it was an active fight) driving into it, circulating around, not even shooting back, disregarding your own life. Whilst being shot at you proceed to make your way back AGAIN, and then leave. And again - that was not said. I was stating a fact - you turned up 17 seconds after your friend is downed. I tried my best to perceive what you was writing with that reply. It was pretty difficult to interpret your response. Also you're not referencing your responses at anyone in particular, so I'm going to assume you're speaking to us all.
  4. Watch the footage again. Notice how no bullets are shot from my gun. I never took a shot at you. You're the aggressor in this situation by entering an active shootout in which you're entering as BACKUP, when you had the capability of sitting at a distance and waiting for a better opportunity.
  5. Here is my footage. https://streamable.com/hhrn12 (EDIT:) https://streamable.com/irio0l extended footage I didn't shoot at them or engage as they drove away. "one of my gang member need help" What did you expect entering then? Did you think we would stop fighting the moment 67 backup came 17 seconds later? That's you acknowledging you came as backup entering the fight. What did you expect when you turn up to an active shootout acting as BACKUP in 67 colour scheme radioing through? It wasn't 2 - 3 minutes after so stop trying to be deceptive. There is literal proof in my footage of you arriving 17 seconds after your friend is finished - contradicting that timescale. "Ey leave they will just shoot at you. Leave. Stay AWAY from the scene. " From your footage, you can hear your own gang member tell you to LEAVE THE SCENE. They are acknowledging you are in danger ENTERING THE SCENE, yet you didn't have that perception yourself. You actually drove INTO an active shootout, didn't engage, circulated around whilst being shot at, and just drove off disregarding your life in the process.
  6. Ty_Shipley (173) - In the provided evidence you can be seen giving demands from the passenger seat of a vehicle without being dismounted with a weapon drawn and pointed to provide a general threat to life. Do you believe the demands given in such a manner were valid and justifiable reason for you and the rest of the reported party to engage on the reporting party? Demands where issued. The guns are pulled. I waited for text chat to go through before I get out as you can clearly see from the 2 second delay I purposely implement. I gave the demand and proceeded to get out simultaneously with a gun in my hand broadcasting the firepower capabilities of myself. Broadcasting demands from the passenger seat is a tactical move against somebody with an off road bike as there is no dysfunctional movement of getting in the vehicle and being delayed in the chase. Yes - the demands were valid and the justified cause of the progressive events.
  7. No information was conveyed whatsoever IC or OOC that you was in the process of a repair as showcased in the footage, so we was under no impression at all you was getting your bikes repaired, no attempt from you was made /b or IC. As we actually passed you instantly called for backup 0:20. There are clear demands given twice, both verbally AND in the second language, as also seen on the video. Even the colleague of this guy says demands have given 0:30 (he actually repeatedly states it) so this contradicts the no demands claim you're making. It's an isolated area and you was overwhelmed with numbers and had 2 guns aimed at you. You evaded the demands disregarding your life and making it unrealistic. There was time to comply otherwise you wouldn't of rode off in a bike. 0:27 we give demands and it takes 4 - 5 seconds for you to leave on bike. You stall for a second acknowledge the demands and then evade. You can also see the demands being made first and then the action of implementing gunpoint follows a second after. For reference: 13. Fear role-play: "A player is not showing proper fear if they run while on foot/bike or in an unpowered vehicle and a weapon is aimed at them at close range, or if they drive into an active shootout more than once without the intent of providing cover or fleeing with it." Caesar was stood a meter away with a .50 pointed to your head. You came up to us at the dam demanding we change colours otherwise there'd be trouble. You also brought 15+ men in an attempt to intimidate us. You started the conflicts when we have had 0 prior interaction. 15. Player Theft, Prison Breakout, and Kidnapping Robberies should be conducted in a realistic manner with reasonable in-character motive using secluded areas. Players should not conduct minor robberies in situations with high risk. Desert or forest areas are considered secluded but witnesses should still be considered.
  8. What's up. No information was relayed. As you may be aware there is a few radio bugs. I never stated where I was going or even communicated until AFTER I got out the water, if I was to communicate underwater that is a perfect example of communicating information unrealistically and non RP. Strongly believe this report was made because I evaded the police officer and maybe this officer was a little bit annoyed, so its certainly a contributing factor to take into account with this report - admins. There has been an excessive amount of Non RP reports for people who have evaded the police legitimately, this being an example. The officer with his sirens approached me at speed, stopping, and entrapping me between the car and barrier. I had an escape, and that was the water. Now, the jump is nowhere near life threatening. The differential between the road pavement on the dam, and the water is around 15 feet. This is toddler height for diving. Nobody is going to die from that or have their life threatened unless: 1. They can't swim 2. They have a weak human anatomy My character does not have either, which is why I survived easily with no damage taken whatsoever. And yes it is realistic, it's obvious it's realistic - it was a rational, conscious decision to jump in the water against 1 police officer with a vehicle. He isn't going to jump in after and leave his vehicle vulnerable. It was a tactical decision and it worked, and now it is being stretched for Non RP. (EDIT: Interesting to see how the officers first response was combatting me with a carbine and not solving it diplomatically) I hope I have helped.
  9. How's it going. We gave him sufficient warnings to give stamps and implemented correct RP techniques - yet when we was isolated with him he ignored Fear RP and continued to run around blatantly disregarding the value of his own life and not following our demands. As for the footage, the cache is deleted after 2 days so why Timowthy has left it this late, is seriously beyond me. That's 48 hours afterwards. It's more evident of his rule breaking of Non Fear RP then it is our alleged rule break so why he is pursuing this is again with a self conflicting report seems strange to me. This was motivated purely emotionally by Timowthy, I strongly believe if he didn't lose the assets in that encounter he wouldn't be here on the reports trying to slap us with warnings. thank you administrators.
  10. My character resists being arrested or detained. That's him. Me and Nakamura mutually agreed near the end before I was put into solitary and the scenario that it is our characters decisions and we have nothing against each other. Other than that it was pretty interesting to see the DOCs response to heavy resistance, and they actually did a good job. Nothing was escalated afterwards, there was no negative outcomes. And I was shot, but accidents happen, which is understandable.
  11. First Last or PlayerID (Specific Rule Broken) ID 140 Yuki Nakamura - Power gaming, Non fear RP, Deathmatching. ID 190 - Deathmatching. ID 183 - Deathmatching. ID 163 - Deathmatching. ID 292 - Deathmatching. ID 320 - Deathmatching. ID 153 - Deathmatching. ID 25 - Deathmatching. ID 361 - Deathmatching. ID 202- Deathmatching. Required Report Format Player(s) being reported: ID 140 Yuki Nakamura - Power gaming, Non fear RP, Deathmatching. ID 190 - Deathmatching. ID 183 - Deathmatching. ID 163 - Deathmatching. ID 292 - Deathmatching. ID 320 - Deathmatching. ID 153 - Deathmatching. ID 25 - Deathmatching. ID 361 - Deathmatching. ID 202- Deathmatching. Date of interaction reported: 22/6/2021. Unix time stamp from HUD: 6 | 1624313222 Your character name: Ty Shipley Other player(s) involved: Yuki Nakamura Specific rule(s) broken: 10. Powergaming (PG) Powergaming is playing unfairly through not allowing other players a chance to roleplay responses and their own actions, unrealistic actions, or non-factual statements in /do. Forceful commands should be used after RP or the party is unresponsive for 30 seconds. Government funded faction members must go off duty when not performing faction duties IC. Players must capture time stamped evidence performing RP that will potentially influence future interactions and evidence is only valid for 48 hours, death, or until others RP invalidates it. 13. Fear Roleplay (FRP) Fear RP is showing appropriate care and concern to preserve your character's safety and life. If a player's life is in direct danger they must RP adequate fear and comply with demands. If an attacker lowers their weapon to type, victims which were under fear RP remain as so. A player is not showing proper fear if they run while on foot/bike or in an unpowered vehicle and a weapon is aimed at them at close range, or if they drive into an active shootout more than once without the intent of providing cover or fleeing with it. A player still has the option to react if they are in a powered vehicle, if they already have a weapon drawn facing their attacker, or if their attacker's view is obstructed by an object. 14. Deathmatch (DM) Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player without a proper IC motive and interaction. Prior interaction should include escalation such as a robbery or a report to the police. Players may not kill victims who have complied with a plausible demand in reasonable time unless involved in severe hostile activity against them or an ally within 3 hours. Players on foot should only be attempted to be hit with a vehicle once with valid motive. Vehicles cannot be used as weapons in active shootouts unless where unavoidable. Players must be able to explain their reason and provide proof of prior reasoning if requested. If a player informs you that your VOIP isn’t working, you must either fix your VOIP using appropriate commands or use text to deliver your demand How did the player break the rule(s)? (300 words maximum) Everybody was compliant with our simple and basic demands with the hostage whilst escaping the DOC. As we are communicating outside in a vehicle - being promised safe passage, and as a colleague of the escape is typing (and stated a second earlier he had the gun tight against hostages head earlier) we are shot at by Yuki Nakumura. I am sniped first. She continues to snipe the rest of the passengers, disregarding the safety of the hostage and stopping the natural flow of RP, implementing unnatural power and self centeredness of her into the situation she had little contribution in. This creates a chain command and other officers start shooting. When asked by a server senior of hers - an admin "who was the person that took the shot" she just stands there, not typing, not communicating but continues to justify her actions by saying to my shot colleague "it doesn't matter who shot you first you decide to get involved? you get shot." an acknowledgment of her conscious decision to shoot 3 of us. This is disgraceful and deters good RP inside DOC, which is probably why a lot of people go for naps in there and never wake up. Evidence of rule breach:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.