Randul

The government income shouldn't a replacement for a steady job or criminal enterprise, I'd like to see numbers tweaked so that say 40% of your government paycheck is used on sustaining yourself, obviously as your wealth increases the amount you receive in your paycheck gets reduced so for the top tier bracket (players who own 1m+ worth of assets) the percentage used to sustain yourself increases to closer 80% of your paycheck.

I understand your frustration but please refrain from insulting staff and / or other community members, all it does is harm your suggestion and stop the dialogue that could be a valid and reasoned discussion to help improve our server. Depending on the situation a moderator or above can review the recent logs of the players involved and determine what happened after discussing the situation with both players, however in certain scenarios it is extremely difficult to see whether a rule has been breached and would require proof for a punishment to be issued. Requesting you to place a report on the forums is a very useful tool as it allows for both parties to present evidence and their side of the story. If evidence wasn't required of some sort to pass punishment onto a player, what you suggest is just listening to hearsay, both parties would account completely different stories leading players just reporting each other because they weren't pleased with how a scenario played out. As suggested in your previous suggestion / rant by @xxxJustTimmy tools such as shadowplay and plays.tv are incredibly useful as they have such low system requirements and save the previous 5/10/15/20 minutes prior to you pressing a key, fortunately it will only save the footage you want limiting the need for excess storage for videos. As our rules state you need OOC evidence of a reason to kill another player, it's not too much to expect the majority of our playerbase to be recording. For further guides on setup and other related topics please review our setup guides very kindly made by members of the community. https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/forum/51-faq-server-guides/

If you change the name of the roles and shift them slightly you are already describing our current plan. As the faction is already in game and being built upon a server suggestion seems slightly odd. If you want to be a part of helping to mold the government put in an application.

It's an IC issue, as the laws of our city are purely in character.

The server rules from my belief need to be broad in this regard, if you are too specific then players will use the excuse of its not written exactly in the rules. Hence why umbrella rules such as no exploits / non rp exist so players can still be held accountable as long as they fall within that range without needing to state every single offence that are covered under those headings. Adding more detail to the rulebook yes removes some room for interpretation however it also allows players to search for those gaps and exploit it. I've played on servers that have extreme rule books (30+ pages) which was far too difficult to enforce and a server rule that all they had listed was nonrp as the singular rule. Personally I favoured the latter, we found players were there to roleplay instead of game the system with less rules.

Reach out to me on discord: randul#8521 and we'll see what the issue is.

If you are struggling with English, then how do you hope of playing in game where the only language is English?

I don't see any benefit to this, the only thing it does is isolate members of the community that doesn't speak that language. We only allow one language to be used in game for a very good reason, this would do the opposite of what you suggest all it will do is divide the playerbase like an american prison.

It's a pretty clean system to be honest, supports will handle /report 1 as they are typically questions asked by new players or anyone really. The problem I see with separateing the channels is you make the system more complex for no real gain and you further the risk of misinformation being spread due to there is no vetting on who is answering those questions.

Support staff in game handle those questions happily, leaving the mod related reports to the moderators and admins.

Unfortunately it's completely an Ic issue, write to the commissioners / cheif of police / protest whatever you like to make them change their mind.

Currently, it's taking roughly 3 weeks, you will be notified by email if you have been accepted or denied.

Try completing exiting gta and steam, then running the game in single player just to ensure that his copy of gta is okay. Ensure that rage mp is closed. Delete the eclipse client resources from inside RAGE\client_resources\ Relaunch rage mp and connect to the server via the server list on the rage mp client.

By fair the biggest flaw with your system is once the answers are available online, the server may aswell have no quiz. Without the written part their is no real way to ensure someone has actually read our rules and understands them.

Due to the original reasons why supers were removed from dealership to begin with, I find it incredibly unlikely that they would return. Have to say I personally appreciate the diversity in vehicles being used currently compered to when supers were easily obtainable.

The response for you could be days or weeks depending on when you submitted it. You will be notified via email if you have been successful or even unsuccessful.

We do, we recently opened up applications for the quiz team yesterday. All I can suggest is being patient.

Glad I could be of help.

Head to your settings in gta and change the input settings. I believe it's direct input you need, however if that fails to work just cycle through them.

You can already buy boats at the port area nere the truckers job.

It's bugged we have no applications awaiting approval that go that far back.

In the quiz in all the answers it's your job to show us that you understand our server rules and know how to apply them. If you can't show that then we will not accept you. On this example you failed to show how our server rules are applied in practise be it some of them or all of them.

Officers wouldn't just go searching, someone would investigate and then call the police force to seize assets close the business.

I think we are getting slightly away from the original point. Making the PD rule book public surely is an in-character issue. As you dispute arrests via IA reports which are in-character. I think it could be an interesting point to bring up in-character, maybe creating a petition and collecting resident's votes. Mayor's campaign policy? However you choose to do it, I believe it should be done in-character. Naturally, this would be a redacted version of their handbook to keep the department operational.

If this would be added I'd use it almost daily. Background checks / business registrations / business licenses / employment contracts / issuing warrants to the police department. Certainly would help with adding more realism to our state.