nikoh Posted January 13, 2020 Report Share Posted January 13, 2020 VDM is most of time time being committed by people who are misinterpreting the rules. This misinterpretation has caused a lot of misuse of vehicles as weapons, resulting in players getting their first DM punishment, and victims getting their RP ruined. My suggestion is pretty simple, reword the current VDM definition: Vehicles cannot be used to attack a player on foot more than once, including a failed attempt To something more clear: Vehicles may not be used as a weapon to ram others during an ongoing scene more than once Sent from my iPod Touch 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubsmeister Posted January 14, 2020 Report Share Posted January 14, 2020 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denza Posted January 14, 2020 Report Share Posted January 14, 2020 The current definition is fine and doesnt need more clarification. It makes sense aa it currently stands. The way you wrote it is literally the same just worded differently. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikoh Posted January 14, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Denza said: The current definition is fine and doesnt need more clarification. It makes sense aa it currently stands. The way you wrote it is literally the same just worded differently. -1 I have to disagree. There are countless player reports with players getting VDM punishments because they thought they could ram multiple people as long as they didn’t ram the same person more than once. My clarification is specified for that exact reason. Thanks for your input though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denza Posted January 14, 2020 Report Share Posted January 14, 2020 5 minutes ago, DetectiveStone said: I have to disagree. There are countless player reports with players getting VDM punishments because they thought they could ram multiple people as long as they didn’t ram the same person more than once. My clarification is specified for that exact reason. Thanks for your input though. Well in that case sure, it could be worded differently. However people lack common sense in that regard as well lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machete Posted January 14, 2020 Report Share Posted January 14, 2020 Big +1 got a warning for it, Had me pissed off for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swattpup1989 Posted January 15, 2020 Report Share Posted January 15, 2020 +1 - even the in game script says A VICTIM, doesn't say any/all players in a situation. Rule isn't clarified enough to limit it. They either need to add a sub point or make it worded along these lines. Because as of right now it states "a player" not all players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xoza Posted January 15, 2020 Report Share Posted January 15, 2020 I'm a little confused about the translation myself now. So it definitely does need reworking. One person, one vehicle, one scene, one VDM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chunder Posted January 20, 2022 Report Share Posted January 20, 2022 SUGGESTION DENIED Thank you for your patience while this suggestion was being reviewed/researched. After reviewing/researching this suggestion, we have decided to deny it for the following reason(s): The VDM rule has been updated to include the "attempt" This decision is final. Unless instructed to, do not post another suggestion pertaining to this topic. You will still be able to submit other suggestions on the forums. Regards, Chunder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.58697792828f27a4ff888e9395d04e90.gif)
