Jump to content
Freyster

Vandalising property should not be DM.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Depending on the situation, it should be NON-RP, not DM.

If I shoot/hit your car, it can be non-RP for some scenarios, but I'm not exactly deathmatching your vehicle.

I would love a little change on that considering there are spikes, which count as DM. I don't think it has to be that harsh.

If people troll, they should be treated with appropriate rule breaks, but DM is a bit harsh for spikes and hitting/shooting a vehicle if the player is not directly attacked.

Posted

+1 for spikes

-1 for shooting at someone in their vehicles to disable it

 

Definitely should depend on circumstance though whether it’s DM or NRP.

Posted

I think the clarification for this is the method being used to attack someone's property. If you shoot at someone's tires, what are the chances a stray bullet hits the vehicle occupant(s)? Or even if the bullet(s) don't hit anyone, what if taking their tire while they are driving at relatively high speeds causes the to crash and get injured. This action is either directly or indirectly causing harm to the other player. It really depends on the circumstances of the situation. 

Posted

As it stands our deathmatching rules do not include damaging other player's property to be deathmatching.

I do not recall when this came into play as I also remember it being a part of the Deathmatching ruleset, but it is no longer considered Deathmatching and could be considered NonRP via Poor RP depending on the situation.

Archived.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.