Ronin

REFUND PENDING RESPONSE ―――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing the request and evidence attached to it, I've decided that you cannot receive a refund at this time. Please review the below and amend your request. @Masonc3434 can you please re-upload the video from the player who dropped the bike for you? You will be given 48 hours to amend your request with the information needed and if you do not do it within the timeframe given your refund will be invalidated. Kind Regards, Senior Moderator Ronin

[PENDING RESPONSES] Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s): Diggy_Anderdingus [ID 93] - Please answer the following inquiries and if you have any evidence of this situation please provide it with your answer(s): Please explain your side of events and provide any POV of the situation you may have Could you please explain the reason behind ignoring demands given to you under gun point? Erik_Walker [ID 76] - could you please provide an un-edited footage of the incident. If the following player(s) above fail to respond to this report within the next forty-eight (48) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards: Senior Moderator Ronin Senior Support SynnrSavior

Pending Review

IRL 90% of civilians cars can be chased easily by cops, while in the server 90% of vehicles used in crimes goes 240 while most of LEOs uses STXs and Scouts which is max 220, so untill someone leaves the pursuit line and deploy high speed you have more than a chance to evade. probably should not point the gun, but I think it is logic to have their gun ready, as it is a high possibility and happens alot that someone appears to be standing to watch but in reality either giving comms planning to shoot the cops on scene or actually shoot themselves. while IRL the high probability is that the person actually just watching.

Julia Whitehorse - 5 tickets

Sebastian Knight 4 tickets

Niobe, La Coureuse, GTO, want more?

Fun goes both ways and that's why things needs to be regulated, I don't have fun being shot at only because I pulled over someone going 190 in the city. Personally I think the way itis now is balanced, Crim side have multiple advantages they can play and use. LEOs have the needed tools to respond. Any situations resulted in an arrest or fight between LEOs and Crim side, it is a consequence of actions crim did.

I do believe there are IC routes for this suggestion to happen which is via the LRC.

I was thinking two months of snow would be fair, one month is not enough. 10 months sun and 2 months snow is more than fair i think.

+1

Sebastian Knight 1 ticket

Julia Whitehorse 2 tickets

Julia Whitehorse 1 Entry J

Sebastian Knight 2 entries

Julia Whitehorse 1 Entry

Sebastian Knight 1 Entry

Julia Chedhamenou - 1 Ticket

Just an opinion about this all, the main idea here is that the job like weazel/DCC to have concurrence to not be the only ones in the market which is the problematic point pointed in this topic, for me this is makes total sense for different reasons, starting with the obvious facts of there will no other choice just that company and for whatever reason you could be blacklisted you will not be able to have that service again ( and the reasons could be so stupid sometimes) and the company operates the way it wants and there will not be any other alternative to it as for example it changes the prices as it wants etc etc etc .. I saw a lot mentioning that it should be taken as a new business and build it up and give the example of MPT. The first thing is building a business especially to compete with a company that already exists and have all the materials to do the job already and the current runner of it just went through application, first rationally speaking who will for example call some private person with unknown materials to do an AD for him instead of going to weazel news? Second, building up such a business will require a lot of everything to aim for a result that is not sure. About the example of MPT, first MPT did a really amazing job and achieved such a amazing point, but even after all the great work they did, MPT had to operate as a contractor sister company for bayview in order to be able to work in mirror park ( because it would not make sense if LSC will grant same materials for a company that will compete with her in her juro of operation), so lets say someone decided to do everything and build a company from the zero and somehow could compete and find a space to operate against a company that have everything ready given to their hands, in what basis it would make sense that the company offers the materials ( AKA scripts) to do her job and perform its duty, in other words how to get it RPly that weazel gave the line of information posting or DCC gave access of the phone app to that company to compete with her in the same juro ? that would make 0 sense at least… One last thing, i like the example of bayview and LSC, which is one of the best example can be mentioned here, two companies operating in different places with different concepts and style of working, even employees when they didnt like to work at one of the places they had the opportunity to keep the job of mechanic but in another company. So for me the idea is a +1 and needed