Some of the rules are in need for a change, because this is just ridiculous at this point. Mostly the DM rules need a change or a polish.
Rules that I don't agree with:
A player cannot kill their victim if the victim is in compliance with the demands.
This rule is such bad RP, i'm suggesting that this should be deleted or re-wrote. One of the reasons that I don't agree with this rule is that if a person complies with my demands he cannot be killed, where is the logic in that? I get it, it's supposed to show that I value his life, but what if I don't value his life? What if my character has developed in to a psychopath and just wants to kill the player, it conflicts with this rule and i'll be punished for DM.
Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player or their property without a proper roleplay reason.
I agree with this rule, but it needs to be changed a little bit. The reason I don't agree with this rules is because as a player who is not in any gang, I get robbed by the other gangs quite a lot and the fact of the matter is that I can't shoot all of them on sight when I see them after they've robbed me. In my eyes this should be changed to where if I get robbed multiple times by the same gang I should be able to kill them on sight next time I see them. Lets say a big gang robs me like 2-3 times in one day, it's obvious that I will have hatred towards them and will seek revenge, knowing where their hangout spot is I should be able to come to them with a gun and shoot all of them on sight, without saying anything, even if some of the gang members that are there were not involved in the scenario where I got robbed, because I want all of their gang dead no matter what. Now if I did something like this lets say at a triads meeting where 3-4 of us pull up and unleash our weapons upon them and kill them all, we'd all get punished for DM or Mass DM (i don't know), which would result in a ban and that's just ridiculous because some of these gangs are too entitled to the rules and I think that ruins some of the roleplay situations because after they lose a fight or do anything that doesn't benefit them at all they all turn to Forum Wars instead of sucking it up and moving on. So my suggestion is that this rule would be changed to benefit the smaller gangs. I know that by changing this rule it would mean that the Police would be at a disadvantage and always targeted, but that's now for the gangs and the police to roleplay and find an agreement so they don't shoot each other all the time.
Unrealistic stunt jumping or the use of an expensive vehicle to ram into other vehicles.
This is another rule who needs to be changed, I'm talking about the "use of an expensive vehicle to ram into other vehicles". This is complete non-sense and here's why: first of all when a gang or a group of people are chasing me and I know that their intentions are to hurt me or even kill me I'd be more happy to, to ram them off the road using whatever car I have, especially when they are on their bikes. This happened recently where 2 guys from WCA were chasing me on their bikes and I told them that I will ram them off their bikes if they don't fuck off in which case they did not fuck off and I tried to ram them of their bike with my Seven-70, then they started to cry about me ramming them with a sports car in which I replied with: "I value my life more than this car". Which should be true if you think about it happening in real life. So my suggestion is, is to change the vehicle ramming other vehicle rule to where you can ram cars that are similar to yours in size and you should be able to ram bikes if your life is in danger.
That's all for now, I'll edit if anything else comes up.
P.S. Sorry for the poor english vocabulary, not my native language, if some of the statements are hard to understand reply and i'll try to explain them better.