Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Psych0neurotic last won the day on December 31 2018

Psych0neurotic had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

47 Excellent


About Psych0neurotic

  • Rank
    Rising Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. @samo You talking about this? 😂
  2. @samo Jokes aside, welcome back. Hopefully you'll spice things up a bit for the people who still play on the server
  3. @Zoloft Looks like it 😂
  4. @verydoge12 Is this the guy that I personally sent to hospital 16 times in 2 weeks? Samy or something like that I think 😂
  5. There have been similar cases where players have been punished for using words like "dumb" ( https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/topic/10766-mask-9234_9900-ooc-insults/?tab=comments#comment-49274 ) and according to @Flucifial, "no one in this community is treated differently regardless of their rank" ( https://gyazo.com/54b40a27cf896b7fcc061f7f7752012d ) . Ballin calling someone "daft" without being provoked shows a big lack of professionalism and it is also an Out of Character insult. According to rule 3.3.2: Players must not threaten other players or use offensive language in OOC chat or OOC context. @Osvaldon Is this behavior acceptable from a Head Admin? He's never been called names by @Zoloft and yet he insults him for no reason.
  6. flattered, really. 😘 You're repeating yourself. I've already addressed every single one of the points that you've made. The only reason you're repeating yourself is that you have nothing else to add, and I highly recommend you stop spamming the thread by repeating yourself unless you have something new to add. Also, as a side note, I'd like to point out your concern regarding me providing evidence of your rule-breaking. No, I don't have to open a new report. Sometimes the evidence is so clear that the reporting party cannot even defend themselves. Take this report as an example: https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/topic/13113-brendan_quinnstranger-4342_1430-671-sexual-roleplay You keep saying "if you have any evidence" "if you think we are breaking the rules" just stop. Seriously. Unlike what you did in your report regarding Jay Gamble, which was reporting him out of spite without any proper evidence of him actually rule breaking, I actually gathered hard evidence of you meta-gaming and presented it. I'm making the staff's job easier by doing all the work and making them only having to be the judge and decide on the punishment that they're supposed to give, instead of having to go around and investigate the reports themselves. There is VIDEO EVIDENCE of your rule breaking below; not what I think, not what I guess, but literal, actual evidence. Yeah I know buddy, it's weird when someone shows evidence instead of accusing someone else without facts, isn't it? Your entire report is spineless and based on thoughts and guesses. "I think he meta-gamed and called his clown friends" "I think they didn't actually say anything and DMed me". Your report is a fucking joke, just like your attempt at following the rules. If you want to create a proper report and waste people's times, at least provide facts like I did.
  7. What I "think" doesn't matter. What evidence presents matters. I've provided evidence of you meta-gaming and lying constantly, which is enough to get you punished. Severity depends on how lenient the staff is going to be. You've lied in your forums replies multiple times, and now you're accusing stranger 6420_8721 ,Mask 9080_1077 , Mask 8816_4241 , Mask 764_1500 , Mask 5618_9455 , Mask 6085_1082 , Mask 9197_2469 of meta-gaming. Me showing evidence of you meta-gaming makes the staff's job easier in order to see how reliable and honest you are and how much they should trust you and your claims. You're claiming he called his friends in OOC and you're expecting the reported party to be recording 24/7; that just doesn't happen. You're claiming they started shooting at your friend without a reason, whilst they are claiming they had KOS and your friend didn't comply. In cases like this, the reported party can be expected to be recording (And saving their recordings) 24/7 if the reporting party, being you and your friends, is known for being reliable and honest and respectable members of the community. You're not any of those. You're a meta-gaming lying gang that is far from respected from the community. P.S. "if you think we are doing meta gaming create a new forum report dont spam on our reprot case" was a solid defense. Got me good. Proper disclaimed every hard evidence.
  8. I did a little bit more digging and I found more evidence that would back my claim, regarding the "sand kids" meta-gaming. In the side by side video that I provided (https://youtu.be/lhVyGZZDDWg), this is what you would be hearing if they were using the radio and/or were meta-gaming via discord without setting it so it doesn't record the other person's voice. I've analyzed Ali's video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GJM6Ygxe0Y) and this is what I gathered: At 00:03 He says "بردار بریم بردار بریم" which translates to "Pick it up let's go. Pick it up let's go" When confronted about it by @John Robert in the following report (https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/topic/13338-mask-1305_1103-mask-3379_7029712-fear-rp-724-deathmatching/?tab=comments#comment-63902) he claims "you [should] use the radio for [relaying] information or [the] plans [that] u have, not for every shit u say. I said 'barda berim' it means LETS GO LETS GO (No it fucking doesn't it translates to "Pick it up let's go Pick it up let's go" not "let's go let's go". You're giving commands. ). lol. the thing i said didnt effect shit on this situation (Technically it did)." (https://gyazo.com/8fc4b5ea5a6a6fbbd4fd86914753ca89) So what we've gathered so far, according to Ali A.K.A. Lucas Sanchez, is that they were, in fact, using discord at the time and they only used radio for relaying information or plans. That is the definition of minor meta-gaming, presented to you by Lucas. See, the problem isn't your "minor" meta-gaming. It's your attempt to hide meta-gaming. As I mentioned at the beginning of this video, the side by side video (https://youtu.be/lhVyGZZDDWg) shows both of their voices. Now that Sanchez admitted to using discord and there's no doubt that they weren't using anything ICly to communicate, we can compare the video with the video from Arman's point of view. In the side by side video (https://youtu.be/lhVyGZZDDWg) you can hear Ali say "Pick it up let's go" at 00:14. If you listen to video from Arman's point of view (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsVqAICcjho) at 00:14 (Or any other time) you cannot hear any other voice coming from discord, confirming that he's set it so his recording device doesn't record discord so he can meta-game in peace. Funnily enough, both videos that proper incriminated them (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GJM6Ygxe0Y) and (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNQtFPi8KMY&ab_channel=armanhesari ) is now unlisted. You're one of the worst rule breakers I've ever seen and your attempts at hiding your tracks is simply, well, simply shit. P.S. Sanchez literally says "I didn't say it ("it" being him saying "Pick it up let's go") in game" (https://gyazo.com/422fd4eb36efa9023b85cf93d8cb72c2) Side by side view: https://youtu.be/lhVyGZZDDWg Ali's view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GJM6Ygxe0Y Arman's view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsVqAICcjho Forums report: (https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/topic/13338-mask-1305_1103-mask-3379_7029712-fear-rp-724-deathmatching/?tab=comments#comment-63902) Sanchez confessing: (https://gyazo.com/8fc4b5ea5a6a6fbbd4fd86914753ca89) AND (https://gyazo.com/422fd4eb36efa9023b85cf93d8cb72c2) @Jbacon since you've had to put up with their shit before in multiple reports, you'd probably want to handle this one as well. Up to you.
  9. Of course no response would be heard Arman! You set your recording device so it doesn't record discord's voices. Bet you think you're proper slick and manipulation master by doing it, but literally anyone who metagames does that. There's nothing special about you. You're saying "it's just a habit" because you "talk for viwers" huh? I got evidence beyond reasonable doubt that you meta-game and you're a liar Let's analyze this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNQtFPi8KMY&ab_channel=armanhesari At 00:04 your friend falls down, and for some reason, you find that extremely hilarious. It's inaudible at 00:06, I have no idea what you're trying to say there. At 00:11 you look at your friend and say "bro...?" but you were talking to your viewers, right? Calling them singular "bro". You then proceed to explain yourself from 00:22 to 00:27, saying "I didn't even move the car. *Pause at 00:23* I swear. *Pause at 00:25* I'll record it and send it to you!" See, now you've got two options: A) Say "I was talking to my viewers again! Nothing out of ordinary with that!" B) Say "That one time I was talking to my friend but in the incident that happened at LSC I was talking to my viewers!" A) If you were talking to your viewers, you wouldn't call them "bro". You also wouldn't need to justify yourself to them by saying "I didn't even move the car I swear" or tell them that you'll send the recording of your game to them to prove that you're not lying; after all, they'd be watching your stream, right? B) If you were talking to your friend, why can we not hear him? Is it that this one time his voice was coincidentally bugged in the recording device that you had and we couldn't hear him, or is it that you set it so when you record your gameplay, it doesn't record the voices that come from discord? There could be an option C that you could choose if you're not a lying cringe-worthy troublemaker that thrives on feeling powerful by false reporting other people. Option C would be you telling the truth. Either option proves you wrong and you literally have no choice but to admit that you lied on the forums. You're a rule-breaking meta-gamer than thinks other people are always rule breaking and meta-gaming. Nothing new. You reported Jay Gamble out of spite.
  10. It's not unrealistic going off-road with a non-off-road bike, it's just a stupid thing that a lot of people, including my character. After I miss judged how steep the hill was, I was going to RP the 20-meter drop with a broken arm or dislocated shoulder, but I got downed immediately after. You didn't RP anything and perfectly survived the 20-meter drop. Aight 😂 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfBqUi27WVE
  11. Nope. I didn't say a single word nor did I point a gun at you. It was Carter who threatened you and pointed a gun at you
  12. Account name: Psychoneurotic Character name(s): Petras_Ramunas Admin who issued punishment: @Flucifial Date of punishment: 09/12/2018 Punishment received: 72 hour ban Reason given for punishment: Deathmatching Your explanation of what happened: My friend and I were going around the town, looking for "postal gang" and after a while, we finally found one. In multiple occasions, my friend and I try to take every single precaution to make sure we're following the rules when robbing this guy, and at the end we realised that we can't even rob him, so we left him there. Why should your appeal be accepted?: There's been thousands of times when this exact scenario has happened. People asking others to pull over and when the victim doesn't pull over, they get fired at. I believe I was the first person in the history that's gotten a DM charge for this, especially after taking this many precautions. After talking to Flucifial on discord, I am almost certain that there was nothing personal about this report, and I think it was just a simple error in judgement. I am going to address everything Flucifial has said in his response: "Just because you shout out of the window of your car, doesn't mean he can hear it on his end." If that is valid, then robbing someone whilst they are in a car is always considered DM. Which means thousands of reports could open up because people were robbed whilst they were in a car. In that case, if the PD asks me to pull over, or stop following them, or anything that would result in them using lethal force as their next action, I could just pretend like I'm blasting really loud music in my car and the windows are closed, therefore if the PD shoots me (which has happened to me, and almost everyone else, multiple times) then it's DM. You're sitting in a vehicle, whether you be near him or not, and he is in a vehicle where all windows and doors are still in-tact, he still may have no way of hearing you. That statement is simply untrue unless it's addressed towards the postal van. The farming van that we stole was shattered, all windows broken and everything. Because of the desync issue, all cars look healthy at all times unless they were damaged when they were near you, so there's never a way of knowing if the windows are in tact or not. In fact, at 00:38 when we ram the postal van, realistically it would've broken the windows and at 00:39, Animal telling him "Pull over" should have been heard by him. At 00:48 I clearly tell him to pull over and he refuses to comply with the robbers' demands, giving us a reason to kill him (Which wouldn't be realistic as our gang only robs people, we never put killing as our first priority, hence why I tried to disable his engine.) You opened fire without having a valid roleplay reason to do so I would strongly disagree with that. If someone who you're robbing refuses to comply with your demands, you have a valid roleplay reason to open fire. The man clearly attempted to escsape and refused to comply. " 7.2 Deathmatch 7.2.1 Deathmatch is the act of killing or hurting another player (or damaging their property) without a proper roleplay reason. An attempt to break this rule will result in a temporary or permanent ban. 7.2.2 Examples of valid reasons to attack another player: • If they attempt to harm, hurt you or damage your property (or if they attempt to do the same to your friends or allies), this also includes an attempt by the police to arrest someone; • If they report you to the police for a committed heavy crime, however, if someone reports you for a light crime, such as illegal parking, then the reason is insufficient; • If they are not in compliance with the demands or if they attempt to escape or call other players for help; " as he never would have had the opportunity to comply with your demands, as he is in a vehicle that has the engine on. Again, I also disagree with this as well. All our demands were, asking him to pull over. His engine was running but he could've pressed the arrow down button, used the hand break, held the reverse button down, or simply stopped accelerating, in order to comply with the demands and pull over. I've been robbed multiple times and I complied by simply, literally pulling over. Post any evidence or further details: From 00:15 I had a clear shot on him, and if my intent was to DM, I would've fired right then and there. At 00:29, I shout out our demands and clearly state what happens if he doesn't comply with our demands. If my intent was DMing, I should've shot right then and there; but instead I specified everything including the cosequences of not complying. At 00:33 I repeat my message, to make sure that he realises that it's a robbery, and to also make it a tiny bit more realistic. You don't just shout your demands once and then sit with your arms crossed and do nothing whilst the driver does everything. For the entirity of the time, I had a clear shot on him and his vehicle yet I refused to take the shot, as it would've been unrealistic, because RPly there was a chance that he couldn't have heard us. At 00:39, after he's rammed into the wall, realistically his windows would be broken and at 00:40 he clearly have heard the demands which were "pull over" whilst there was a gun being pointed at him 2 seconds later. At 00:43 I clearly state "We can't shoot", because I still wanted to give him a chance to properly pull over and make the RP more entertaining for us instead of a simple cat chasing mouse RP. If I hadn't done my research, and read multiple reports of other admins talking about the realism of robbing other people whilst both the victims and the robbers are in a car, I would've shot him right then and there because almost everyone that I know would've done that. At 00:47 he's being told to pull over, whilst he had a gun pointed at him, and both cars are stationary. He refuses to comply so I decide to disable his engine. We stayed in character for the entirity of the time and if our intent was to do Non-RP actions, we would've at least talked with our normal voices. At the end of the day, I know my "intent" doesn't matter that much, but it's simply not DM. He refused to comply with our demands when he clearly heard them, and we followed rule which states that it's a valid reason to shoot someone if they attempt to escape or refuse to comply. Taking so many precutions, including: giving the man 21 seconds (From 00:30 to 00:51) to follow our demands, repeating our demands multiple times, and at the end of the day not even killing him and only trying to disable his car, getting the same charge as literally picking up an AK, walking up to someone, gunning them down and then executing them, is a bit unfair don't you think? EDIT: Also I would like to add, PD is allowed to shoot tyres and such without recieving DM charges for it. That is another reason why I aimed at the engine instead of the person Here's the initial report: https://forum.eclipse-rp.net/topic/12569-6297_6981-8233_4164-755/ Here's the video of what happened, from my prespective:
  13. "we rob player, he all the time go into /b and try to influence our ic actions with his ooc words he is telling us what our characters should do via ooc chat and also disrupting our roleplay " A. How on earth did I metagame? After you were done with robbing me you asked me to stay on my knees and you ran outside, either to force me to get tired and not comply so you could KOS me, or to just intentionally waste my time. What you were doing was borderline kidnapping and you didn't have a KOS on me. You were just wasting my time for no reason. I asked you to stop intentionally stalling RP which is against the rules, how is that meta gaming? Are you that desperate for making reports that you just randomly choose a rule and then report a random Mercia member for that rule? Is this how you assert dominance? B. Mixing IC and OOC. Asking you, not to stall RP, is not mixing IC and OOC. I had to go, and you were stalling RP I have nothing else to add, this is just a pathetic attempt by a power hungry dude trying to get even OOCly because I complied with his demands
  14. Because at 00:30 when we were going 90 KM per hour, I shouted out of the window and told him to stop, and did it again at 00:33. We thought realistically he probably couldn't have heard that, so we repeated "pull over" whilst pointing a gun at him multiple times. At 00:47, we finally got a chance to meet all the realistic criteria for a proper robbery and the owner of the van refused to comply. We could've killed him right then and there according to the robbery rules, but killing people didn't match our gang's personality and just to be safe, I decided to shoot the postal van instead to stall the car. I'm a bit confused, could you explain it to me? If someone refuses to comply with our demands during a robbery, are we just to let them leave?
  • Create New...