Jump to content

flow

Support Staff
  • Content Count

    143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

flow last won the day on January 12 2018

flow had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

113 Excellent

About flow

  • Rank
    Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

965 profile views
  1. You are providing none of that however. You have not until now given any reason that would justify your actions. A cop turning cop killer needs a very good roleplay buildup and reasons that justify such thing. You are unable however to provide the story leading up to this and you are not able to justify your action beyond "they consented". The consent was believing you had a story and proper roleplay reasons to do such actions, yet you still can't paint the picture of a sheriffs deputy becoming a murderer. It is entirely non-rp without proper reason. I would also like to know who approved the alternative roleplay? And to claim these rule breaks are vanilla is worrying coming from a staff member. My involvement in this report was zero until you decided to mention me and post our private conversations. For you to now sit here and try to use the fact that I replied as some pseudo proof for what you claim is absurd. I'm here because you involved me. That video you posted is your grand roleplay that you went and broke server rules for? Name, rank, dead. This is it?
  2. Since you bring me up, I might as well give my two cents. You were discharged for OOC Corruption. The fact that you quit in F4 shortly before all that to avoid such action doesn't mean anything. The second you associated yourself with a gang you were in breach of our rules. And that is exactly the problem. You have given up on a life of law enforcement ICly and then suddenly turned into a murderer? You received a suspension and that sent you over the edge and made you kill people? Your roleplay reason makes no sense whatsoever and is not a valid reason to kill 2 people. Kitiara consented to roleplay, not to being deathmatched. You had no reason to kill. Steve Rudy was never asked consent by you, he was gunned down without any initiated roleplay outside a store. He did not enjoy this either. You pm'ed her to be at CandyPayne so you can kill and kidnap them. You've metagamed in order to fulfill your motives. That claim is outlandish to say the least. The reason this is now a report is that you were trusted as a staff member to give them the right information and that your actions were within the rules, which they were not, on multiple counts. Just a few days ago you told all of us how you, hate the Zetas and told us that allegedely Jay Gamble removed you from the zetas because you chased and shot/arrested him on your SD character. Understandably after you've made such claims, none of what you're saying makes any sense. I do not care about you leaving, what I care about is that I'm not letting you or anybody else use SD and its members for your motives and con them into being part of your deathmatch and rulebreaks. They both trusted your judgement as a staff member and were utterly let down. As for the below quote, you did none of this with the goal in mind to enrich anyone's experience. Your claim that you broke metagaming rules in order to provide good roleplay is simply false. You metagamed in order to fulfill your motive, no other reason.
  3. Apart from the insurgent and wedge, yes, I think most suggestions are reasonable.
  4. If you and any other gang have issues with anything our members do, I know that myself and I am sure Osborn too, are okay with you sending us a quick message with the problem and we'll deal with it. Neither PD nor SD encourage people to camp labs and chops, so if that happens we need to know. Ideally by whom. And we will act. Certain faction leaders do message me from time to time with issues on discord and we talk about them and I do try to resolve them.
  5. You are looking at this from the wrong perspective. The problem isn't too many cops, because you will never ever see these numbers online at once. The issue is the lack of things to do for criminals. Taking some cops away will not increase your roleplay. You are still bound to the current limits. You need to make this a crimrp vs. lack of things to do thread, not a crims vs cops thread, that won't go anywhere.
  6. Yeah, vests should not be unlimited. Maybe 2 extra vests per cruiser since you'll need that if you partner up and that's it. As for ammo, it is small and easy to store and realistic to have extra ammo with you. Having maybe an additional 4 clips isn't overkill.
  7. Player(s) being reported: 104, 86, 166 Date of interaction reported: 19/JAN/2020 Unix time stamp from HUD: 1579468738 Your characters name: John Wallace Other player(s) involved: Tony Henge, Kitiara Romanov, Kane Mayhem Specific rule(s) broken: 8. Non-Roleplay (NRP) Actions that are unrealistic or promote poor quality roleplay are considered as non-roleplay. Examples of actions that are considered as non-roleplay: • Cop Baiting - Provoking a reaction from emergency services without a realistic reason. • Mercy Killing - Asking to be killed by a friend (Killing a friend falls under deathmatching). • Unrealistic stunt jumping or the use of an expensive vehicle to ram into other vehicles. • Spawning a scripted work vehicle and using it for crimes or submerging any vehicle in water. • Swimming in water for an unrealistic amount of time or without a destination during a chase. Players who disconnect during roleplay must reconnect and inform other parties in order to resume roleplay. If you are unable to reconnect it may be excused after providing proof. In a situation where a player gets away from an incident where they're being chased/pursued, they must wait 15 minutes before they can logout. Players should not instigate roleplay situations if they do not have time to play it through. Players who ignore answering roleplay commands directed at them, e.g. /do. In a situation where a player’s game crashes or the player is kicked from the server, they should be allowed to have the same advantages as they have had before their leave. Players should not deprive other players of roleplay, e.g. early on the interaction asking them not to speak unless it makes sense in the roleplay situation. How did the player break the rule(s)? They were struck down during a shootout with an opposing gang and when we arrived on scene all crashed without coming back nor informing us of it through any means. Evidence of rule breach: Staff Chat was covered, can provide full screenshot
  8. Hello, I would like to know more about the immediate area of this property, especially the drug drop off! Sincerely, Sheriff John Wallace
  9. How much are you looking to get for it? I'm interested in buying it.
  10. Being official is a priviledge that factions earn for providing the community with good roleplay. It's not something that can be bought and its purpose has nothing to do with money. The priviledges official factions have are given for their roleplay, dedication and general enrichment of the community. A system like this wouldn't account for roleplay value, anyone can get money and unlock things. So no, definitely not something that would be beneficial to the server.
  11. I am not sure why you are bringing an IC interaction we had, which was some nice role play by the way. I don't see what point you are trying to make here, that conversation was after the report had been handled, before this forum report. I also do not understand the connection you see between them two? ICly, you are threatening to kill John Wallace for months and that rant is a result of it. This is all IC and you are now trying to use that OOCly. This video has nothing to do with this report whatsoever. I at no point attacked you in /b and checking my chat logs will prove that. You reported me and I defended myself, giving my side of the story and you didn't like my side of the story. The reason there is no more video footage is because this was dealt with IG and the footage was then deleted, as there was no need. We did not plan to make a report about the same situation like you are doing now, so we had no reason to keep the footage. The videos that you posted however, make it very clear that it was deysnc when I drove through your Kamacho. This is starting to become very very petty, I am not sure what you are trying to achieve as it has changed from reporting a rule breach to now trying to use every possible way to get some sort of revenge on us.
  12. I'm sorry your argument is not valid. You were not PITed, you were rammed at low speeds. Please do not warp what happened. A PIT is a different thing altogether. The cruiser, as seen on your screen, rammed into the back of your SUV at low speeds, not a PIT. So yes, that is what a ram bar is made for. Granted, not at high speeds, that wont help much, but in these low speed situations, which happened here in this case, it is absolutely within reason. Furthermore, the fact that I am driving through your car like it does not exist in both videos reinforces my point of it being desync, on my screen you were not parked like you were, on my screen I did not drive through you, which wouldn't be possible. Since on my screen you were not in my way, it looks like I just drive through you on both of those videos, that is the very definition of desync. I also do not think your passive aggressive tone is fitting in a community setting.
  13. John Wallace here. I sadly don't have footage from this incident as it was already handled IG and after that, I had no reason to keep on to it. I can however point to both videos posted as evidence and my involvement in those. I did not on my screen drive through your vehicle. As you can see in both videos, my car goes through your car like it doesn't exist. It is desync, on my screen your were pressed against the wall and I drove around you on the left. On regards to the ramming you are reporting that happened later, which was also desync but I'll let the guy speak for himself. On a general note, I am not sure where this misconception comes from that it is NON RP to ram a vehicle, in this case your SUV, with a cruiser. The cruisers have a push bar installed at the front of the vehicle. These are heavily reinforced steel and aluminium constructions which are built for this very purpose. They take any impact away from the engine and other vital parts of the vehicle's front and distribute them throughout a heavily reinforced steel safety frame. Police interceptors are built to take these bumps. Of course not a high speed collision, but if you were hit like seen in your video, this was a low speed hit which a cruiser absolutely can take. You were not stationary, your vehicle was moving and given the forward momentum and basic physics, that collision was not anything the cruiser wouldn't be able to survive given its purpose built, reinforced frame. This is what these vehicles are designed to do and it is beyond me why people believe it's NON RP. Further, there is no rule even indicating that ramming any vehicle with a cruiser is NON RP. It's not NON-RP, it's exactly what you would expect from a police cruiser. I suggest to research police cruisers, their reinforced frames and push bars.
  14. Date and time (provide timezone): Persistent issue. Character name: John Wallace Issue/bug you are reporting: Members of SD who are in the Special Enforcement Detail branch and use /phat get the PD hat instead of the SD one. Members of the other branches get the right hat. Expected behavior: /phat should give all members and branches the SD hat. Evidence, notes worth mentioning, steps to replicate:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.