Jump to content

Roderick

Member
  • Content Count

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

1 Follower

About Roderick

  • Rank
    Rising Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Good evening! As you might have noticed, mr. Augusta (( @Gramz )) and I have recently partnered up and have bought this beautiful gunstore with a both practical and elegant gun range. We have decided to call our store "BANG for you BUCK!" because you get the best weapons possible for a low price. The front of the BANG for your BUCK! property To celebrate our new store we have decided to do a give-away of a beautiful, new bike: the famous Pegassi Bati 801! All you have to do is to make a picture of yourself buying at least $10,000 worth of guns and leave the picture in a reaction underneath this message to enter the giveaway! The event will end two weeks from the start. A GPS picture showing the location of the property Good luck to all! Kind regards, Mr. Marchisio
  2. A big +1 from me. It's realistic that customer can buy not just guns but also seperate ammo at stores. Maybe it could be implemented that just ammo could be bought a bit cheaper than a whole gun and ammo could also be imported a bit cheaper than a gun plus ammo. Either way; great suggestion!
  3. As the title states, my suggestion is to implement this principle into the punishment appeals. In my opinion it is very wrong that players can be off worse by appealing their punishment, especially now this appeal is also being done by the same person. The punishment appeals' section is there for a reason - and rightly so. In my humble opinion players should be free to appeal their punishments if they feel they were unjustified and shouldn't be withheld of doing so by fear for added punishment.
  4. Hey! First of all - welcome to the server. Secondly, this is definitely not a bug. I'll explain. After you've been cleared for the firearms license on the government website you're able to pick it up at the LSPD front office desk. If you don't know where the LSPD is, check your map in east LS. After you've picked the license up at the LSPD you'll be able to buy guns at gun stores. 🙂
  5. Roderick Marchisio You know me as both the car enthousiast and the idiot with the briefcase.
  6. Still looking for one of these beautiful cars!
  7. As the title states I'm looking to buy a maxed Tailgater on the cheap! I can be contacted at Roderick#[email protected]
  8. @krillinas I see the biggest point of discussion amongst the trucking community as the low amount, i.e. $1000, as payment for a job that takes a while. Would you consider a higher minimum payment to be an acceptable alternative to solving the problem instead of creating a whole trucker union faction? I don't see a faction-based trucker union as a realistic goal right now, seeing as it's one of the few civilian RP opportunities new players have and it requires a load of development. A higher minimum payment would solve that a lot of work would be done against very little pay while the trucker job would still be accessable to everyone who wishes to participate in this branch of civilian RP.
  9. Hey! I heard Schlongberg Sachs offers some great deals on loans! You should check out their website: SSBloans.com ((https://discord.gg/5e3EM8))
  10. Roderick

    My situation.

    Take care my favourite old man and Russian mechanic! PMbox is always open for you. 🙂
  11. Roderick

    ID 47 VDM

    In my opinion this is a clear example of a player roleplaying a criminal and assuming because he does so the rules concerning realistic actions should differ towards his favour without any apparent reason. As clearly seen in the video, I moved myself towards the gate when the culprit was without any movement in front of the police cruiser. He only started his movements after I closed the gate. It seems evident to me that premeditation was present as not only was he the person starting the actual RP situation but also was he able to think his actions over before engaging his movement when he was standing still in front of the police cruiser. According to the culprits' logic I shouldn't have been allowed to close the gate to our private parking lot because of a possible risk of a then stationary vehicle moving towards me. I rest my case.
  12. Good day, My business partner and I are willing to offer $4,500,000. It is however a "take it or leave it"-offer. Could you be so kind to let us know whether or not you're willing to accept this offer? Kind regards, Mr. Marchisio
  13. Roderick

    ID 47 VDM

    Player(s) being reported: ID 47 Date of interaction reported: 05/30/2019 Unix time stamp from HUD: 1559215515 Your characters name: Roderick Marchisio Other player(s) involved: James Paige - was with me trying to check if the suspect's car was actually his. Specific rule(s) broken: 14. Deathmatch (DM) Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player or their property without a proper roleplay reason. Examples of valid reasons to attack another player: • If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property. • If they report you to the police for a serious crime. • If they are not in compliance with demands, attempt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules. A player cannot kill their victim if the victim is in compliance with the demands. A player must allow their victim enough time to comply with the demands. You must give demands via text if used as a reason to attack as VOIP isn’t always heard. Vehicles cannot be used to attack another player more than once including a failed attempt. The act of killing a player with no engagement in roleplay is not allowed. Killing a player that has obeyed all orders and demands during a roleplay situation is allowed, with roleplay, only within 3 hours of: Severe hostile or criminal action is taken against you, e.g. someone is robbing you at gunpoint. (Excluding police aiming a gun at you.) Someone is attempting to take your life. Someone is attempting to take the life of your close friend or ally, or if you have witnessed it happen. You must explain your reason to kill to the player IC and have OOC evidence proving your reason. How did the player break the rule(s)? The player came up to me asking if I could take his car at our parking lot. I suspected it wasn't his and police officer James Paige was on scene already and asked him to check it because it was suspicious. We drove up with the police cruiser and when I already closed the gate, the player tried to drive through both me and the gate without chance of him actually going through it. I died because of this attempt to drive through a closed gate. According to the rules, a player must perform realistic actions. Realistic criminal roleplay should therefore contain at least, but not solely limited to, roleplaying actions that only could be expected from what any reasonable thinking criminal would do. As per the evidence provided, I myself cannot come to any other logical conclusion than that the accused broke said ECRP Server Rules. I see this as a breach of the (vehicle) deathmatch rule because I deem it both unrealistic and testifying of poor RP trying to drive through both a person and an immovable object and taking an innocent persons' life in the process. Evidence of rule breach: https://streamable.com/xkyef
×
×
  • Create New...