Valid Demands from a bike passenger.

[Phil McGee]

At the moment you are under fear rp if a weapon is pointed at you while on a bike as you are classed as being "vulnerable".

If that's the case, logically a bike passenger should be able to issue demands to a person on foot by pointing a gun at them. Really what's the difference in that scenario besides the passengers feet are not planted on the ground? 

 

+1 Phil

Edited November 29, 2021 by Phil McGee

[dominykas]

This statement should only apply if there was proper roleplay escalation and deathmatching rights to give demands in the first place. From my understanding demands do not grant deathmatching rights. Also you should only be allowed to give demands from a motorcycle at logical speeds. It wouldn't make sense for a passenger on a motorcycle going 100 km/h to give demands to another.

[TheCactus]

On 11/29/2021 at 1:10 PM, Phil McGee said:

At the moment you are under fear rp if a weapon is pointed at you while on a bike as you are classed as being "vulnerable".

If that's the case, logically a bike passenger should be able to issue demands to a person on foot by pointing a gun at them. Really what's the difference in that scenario besides the passengers feet are not planted on the ground? 

 

+1 Phil

To answer your question: there's no difference other than the presence of sync issues. If you are the passenger of a bike/car you can point a gun towards someone and give demands. As long as they would be realistically audible and the other party would be able to aknowledge the threat, they are valid. To make them valid you also have to use a /me to "point the gun" before you do it with your mouse. This is necessary because some people may not see you have a gun in your hand due to sync issues.

Edited January 5, 2022 by TheCactus