Jump to content
Revelt

Poker bug 3 way split

Recommended Posts

Posted

Date and time (provide timezone):  19/07/2020 16:50 GMT+7

Character name: Revelt DeOrtiz

Issue/bug you are reporting: 3 Way Split Poker, Same Ace Card different Number Card, 3 People with same pair card and high bet, the person have higher card not didn't get the money but the lowest one get the money.

Expected behavior:  The money split to 3 players that join the high bet with same pair card and high number.

Evidence, notes worth mentioning, steps to replicate

48116b38b95d73d2a465857cab823ba4.png
Vehicle license plate number*
-

Posted (edited)

Based on your video High card did win, A+Q. but that person bet all in so bets went higher. The secondary bet should have went to A+6 but went to A+2 instead. Looks as if A+2 had more money than A+6 so that being said. A+Q won all of A+6's money so the rest would indeed go to A+2. If any of that makes sense.

Edited by Don Darko
Posted (edited)

We already done had this discussion at long length @Don Darko Texas Holdem is based off the best 5 cards nothing more. So this would have been a 3 way split as all 3 of them had an Ace high straight. So he is correct. Secondary high cards don’t matter in this situation because there is already 5 cards in play.

Edited by Dangerous
Posted (edited)

@Dangerous Texas Holdem IS based of the best 5 cards, unless the players all have the exact same hand. There are a few ways to decide on the winner in Official Texas Hold'em one being the kicker card as I mentioned, another being a split pot evenly and another being a high-low split. This situation looks as if it could have been based on kickers or even high-low split. It is all dependent on how it is written up at the table. Then of course there is the typical suit ranking. clubs(lowest), followed by diamonds, hearts, and spades (being the highest). Again it is all dependent on how the rules are written up at this specific table.

Edited by Don Darko
Posted
2 hours ago, Don Darko said:

Based on your video High card did win, A+Q. but that person bet all in so bets went higher. The secondary bet should have went to A+6 but went to A+2 instead. Looks as if A+2 had more money than A+6 so that being said. A+Q won all of A+6's money so the rest would indeed go to A+2. If any of that makes sense.

i went all in, the person who have lower card than me A+2 also went the same money as me

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.