atw3ll Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago Player(s) being reported: ID 51 Date of interaction reported: 28/JUN/2026 Unix time stamp from HUD: 1782665412 Your characters name: William Club Other player(s) involved: Specific rule(s) broken: 14. Deathmatch (DM) Prior interaction should include escalation such as a robbery or a report to the police. Players on foot should only be attempted to be hit with a vehicle once with valid motive. 13. NRP Ramming a Kamacho with a sports car How did the player break the rule(s)? Was sitting at Davis station not even looking at my screen when some dude randomly rolls up and I catch him out of the corner of my eye. Doesn't say a word, just starts shooting. I don't even know who this guys is but luckily I tabbed in and drove away in time. Seen him a few minutes later during a shootout that I assume he was trying to start. He decided to use his LC to flip a Kamacho so he could get advantage in the fight. NRP at it's finest. It is clear from the clip that he did this intentionally to get 15 seconds of completely free shooting at me while the car was upside down. Evidence of rule breach: DM: https://medal.tv/games/gta-v/clips/n0xsKELALsEbB1mWD?invite=cr-MSx0Q1UsODIwMTE5MDM&v=45 NRP: https://medal.tv/games/gta-v/clips/n0xZArSDrGrAAh4P9?invite=cr-MSxwTHksODIwMTE5MDM&v=30 Can provide a full POV to staff as we were discussing his initial DM attempt in staff chat and requesting a member of his faction let him know to save POV. Quote
NotMattch Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago PENDING REVIEW━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Thank you for taking the time to submit this report. It is now under review. During this time, we ask that everyone involved refrain from any back-and-forth discussions. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch Quote
NotMattch Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago PENDING RESPONSE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [ @Auxlift ] - Ash_Peters (ID 51) - Please explain your reasoning and rationale for opening fire at the reporting party as shown in the provided evidence. Additionally, please explain the contact between your vehicle and the reporting parties kamacho including what your intentions were and what the outcome you were aiming to achieve was. Finally please provide any video evidence of the situation that you may have. [ @atw3ll ] - William_Club (ID 71) - Please provide the full unedited video to myself. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 48 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Please refrain from any back-and-forth and respond to your inquiry only. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch Quote
Auxlift Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Hello, Ash Peters here. Regarding the first incident at Davis Station, I would like the reporting party's full POV to be reviewed with TAC and microphone audio enabled if possible, as I believe it provides important context. I would also request the passenger POV if available. I do not have POV of this engagement. This was not a random encounter. The situation had already escalated from a bank robbery where we disengaged and attempted to set up an ambush at Mirror Park. The fight then continued at Juan’s Labs, where both our group and police exchanged gunfire. At that point there was already an active shootout involving multiple officers. The reporting party was responding to that ongoing situation, which can be seen by the backup marker on his GPS approximately 0.43 miles away. From my perspective, he was part of the active police response and therefore a valid participant in the ongoing engagement. When I saw him at Davis Station, my intention was to get out and issue demands. Before I could do so, he immediately drove away, so I instead shot his tyres in an attempt to stop him from leaving. Later in the situation, after he had returned in another Kamacho, police were actively pushing us from multiple directions and we were taking fire while being pinched, he was driving his kamacho going slow speeds through the middle of the shoot out. My intention was to use my handbrake and slide across the front of his vehicle to stop or block it. I did not intend to strike the side of the Kamacho or flip it over. The collision was not the outcome I was aiming for. After the collision I got out and opened fire. If you review the reporting party’s footage, you can see that while the Kamacho was upside down, my shots were hitting the roof of the vehicle rather than damaging the occupants. I only began hitting the reporting party once he had exited the vehicle. From the footage provided, neither occupant appears to be talking in game during the engagement. As both were involved in an active police gunfight, I believe they were likely communicating over TAC. I would like this to be reviewed alongside their full unedited POV and passenger POV if available, as I believe they where metagaming by not talking in game when talking over tac which is required by the rules. Unfortunately, I was unable to save my full POV as I was still in the middle of the gunfight and being engaged from multiple positions. I only managed to save the clip once I was out of immediate danger. The POV I do have is here: https://medal.tv/games/gta-v/clips/n0BM5zI9PxcjUX6bQ?invite=cr-MSxRdXIsNzIxOTYxOA&v=41 Quote
NotMattch Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago PENDING RESPONSE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [ @QueenOfMisfit ] - Dylan_Chapple (ID 8 ) - Please provide any video footage of the situation that you may have If the requested player(s) do not respond within 48 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Please refrain from any back-and-forth and respond to your inquiry only. Regards, Senior Moderator NotMattch Quote
QueenOfMisfit Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Hi! I unfortunately do not have POV. Sorry! Quote