Sineye
-
Posts
155 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Sineye
-
-
@BallinByNature
The report that spawned your reply was the basis for this discussion, but I am more interested in the effects it can have in future situations, I will try and elaborate bellow.''This rule is not something new, all players are held to the non-RP standard of performing realistic actions. Having this rule actually does the exact opposite, it sets the guideline that basic investigations are actually required (not prevented?) instead of just guessing at charges which would not hold up in any real sense''
Let's move away from the report in question and into hypotheticals, which I think is the ideal way to test ideas/concepts. You stated that a ''requirement for placing irrefutable charges is confirming the identity beyond a shadow of a doubt which cannot be done with masks on and based on voices. ''
Person X is seen and heard, wearing the same clothes he always wears, and in his personal vehicle, shooting at police officers and eventually getting away. The officer that was leading the pursuit provides a brief hunch of who it might be, given the available evidence. IB is called in, bullet casings are collected, tire marks on the road are collected, body cam from the officer is collected. Although at no point do we see the man unmasked, after further investigation involving the collected evidence, we determine that the tire marks belong to the vehicle that matches Person X and the bullet casings from a weapon recently bought under Person X's name, all of this done via the initial hunch that the officer gave because he heard the man speak and saw that he wore his usual outfits. Person X is brought in for questioning, he comes in once again using his usual attire and his voice resembles the one the initial officer heard. We ask him the questions that need to be asked, he denies everything and provides a vague alibi for his whereabouts during the situation. He is let go.
My question to you is, can we charge Person X based on the above investigative RP or are we not allowed to do so given that we never saw him without a mask ?
Depending on the reply I might bring up other points you made, but I believe going straight for the main question would be more productive than engaging in a huge back and forth. Thank you for the initial reply and any future ones.
I have not been pd but with the situation you just described it seems there is a simple rp solution rather than making assumptions as to who's gun it is and who's tire tracks it is with again not having any solid proof that that person and that car are exactly who you think they are.
In that situation it would make sense to me that you would note who you think it might be, gather those bullet casings, dust them for fingerprints as he would have had to touch those rounds to load them into his magazine afterwords loading the magazine into his gun. At this point with my body cam footage and the potential finger print proof I have with those casing I would detain the suspect and run his fingerprints for a match with him there in /me and /do providing him the body cam/ proof that you were there and collected the casings giving him a chance to respond with his own rp such as yeah you got me I didn't rp with gloves on or he purposefully used gloves to avoid detection through finger prints. At that point if the finger prints come back a match you've got your undeniable proof right there.
All this to say there is in my opinion a blatantly obvious rp scenario that removes the need for you to assume who it is and place charges, assume who he is and based on the casing assume you know who's gun it is, assume based on your hunch that the tire marks most definitely be his car.
Think of it less in an aspect of oh I "know" who this is, think of it from the aspect of what physical proof of a crime can I gather to confirm with undeniable evidence that he is exactly who I think he is. In my opinion it is really not that hard. May it be a lot different then the way you guys do it now and may it be an adjustment? Yes. An the contrary will it increase everyone's rp experience on the server both cops and crims included by going more in depth on the role play? Hell yeah and at the end of the day that is what this server is about, serious in depth role play not the quickest path, easiest path, or path of least resistance.
-
Only time I ever did this I left the gps and such in the car. It isn't possible unless you are empty.
-
Nice to meet you! Hope you enjoy your time on the server.
-
-1 I think it is obvious and has been stated why this can't be a thing.
-
-1 Only ever seen this been used as a way to offend someone while giving the people cutting their hair a good laugh and never seems to be really good rp. I don't respect the current rp as far is this goes and that is why this doesn't have my support.
-
1
-
-
Retracting my offer due to the failure of the seller to respond.
-
On 3/8/2020 at 7:34 PM, Tomvd682 said:
It is a user-friendly and simple kitchen appliance you can use to lightly cook and toast bread slices so they become crispier, darker, and tastier. When using these appliances, you will need to adjust the tool’s knob in order to choose how dark you would like your bread slices to be toasted.
After that, you will slide your bread slices into the toasting slots and then press the lever on the front side of your appliance so the toasting procedure can begin.
Pretty sure what you are describing is my dish washer.
-
I need to know when this auction will close. If it just sits here I will need to remove the offer I made.
-
45 minutes ago, nikolakis said:
the location show it in map
1 minute ago, nikolakis said:show me the location pls
This isn't productive. Wait and see if they will give you the GPS location.
-
-
https://www.twitch.tv/ballinbynature420/clip/HyperFlirtyPlumCmonBruh?filter=clips&range=7d&sort=time
Disables flight controls too apparently. Don't know if it affects helicopters.
-
Good luck.
-
HIGHLY overpriced. Charging a 2 g price for a 1g that isn't even standalone/buildable.
-
Just a though I had and decided to kinda spitball it and see what people think of it. The thought would be an additional in character section on the forums that would be designated as the dark web. This would be designated for the unlawful trading of items, in character organization stuff, or classifieds. These are just some basic ideas and I feel others may have a better inclination on what the categories should be. Also I did a little bit of an inspect element so everyone could better visualize it. Suggestions suggestions suggestions.
-
3
-
2
-
-
6 minutes ago, Kukata said:
Of course it is but it is related to the Super category don't forget that. It doesn't go out of the shadows from the other Super vehicles.
Just cause you tag "super" on the front doesn't make it a super. Yeah it is technically classed as one but I don't think anyone looking to buy a super would ever in their right mind consider taking a sultan. Sell it to whoever is offering you 5m. It is likely the best offer you will ever get. Doubt it will get sold for that though in all honesty.
-
3
-
1
-
-
Good luck selling this one for 5m. I don't see this going for that much due to how common the import one is along with the lack of having a real super look to it.
-
1
-
-
+1
-
-
+1 actually been considering making this request myself.
-
Would you be willing at all to rent this property?
-
-
-
-
Huge punishment
in Archive
Posted
The Sultan RS while I don't agree with GTA's classification of it is a super car. I would class it more of a sports car but regardless of what class you stick it in of the two one thing is sure. It is a highly modified, being the rs version, and highly expensive vehicle the should reflect that in the cost of parts and replacement.