Jump to content

HobGoblin

Donator
  • Posts

    554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by HobGoblin

  1. Overall the HUD should have an in game setting menu that allows players to change their HUD style. This would allow players to change the minimap shape and should also allow players to chose where the icons are on screen.

    This would be nice to have aswell, the current compass at the bottom left is out of view a lot of the times. Having an option to have the compass at top or bottom left in the hud setting menu.
    https://www.gta5-mods.com/scripts/simple-compass-and-street-names-hud

    • Like 2
  2. This would stop people using headpeeks and corners to shoot people when on the other persona screen they can not see the other player. 

    This has been implemented on multiple servers on ragemp. I have included a video below showing the feature. 

    Example: 

     

     

    • Upvote 3
  3. On 3/19/2024 at 5:35 PM, tigerpet15 said:

    Give detectives chance to access recent events of doors/cars/tools/was in the field of camera - I think detectives should be able to access a list of IDs who used doors/cars/tools/cameras to give them ability to RP with /ldos an investigations like IRL. It would promote a lot more RP and Id love to get arrested after thoughtful investigations/house raids etc. 

    I wish we had more ways to see who interacted with certain things. Currently, we have to ask admins and even then it can take awhile to get a response. A lot of the commands exist in the game but are limited to mod/admin+.

    Players have the option to leave a /fdo on the scene, however only a handful of players willfully leave /fdo for detectives to investigate.

  4. 11 hours ago, BulkyUmbrella60 said:

     I also think that cops should not have access to dirt bikes and sport bikes as their vehicles, it just makes it very unfair for criminals and it ruins criminal roleplay.

    Please explain how having bikes makes it unfair for criminals

  5. 2 hours ago, AtlasOLimbo said:

    I don't understand why we're so vehemently against seeing what players are online to begin with? If you truly are looking for someone, you can check their discord status, etc. 

    That is not the issue. It's that people check to see who they are interacting with based of how much exp they have.

  6. There is no reason for a standard player to see exp on the scoreboard. The exp gets abused by players as they check the scoreboard to see how experienced the player is when interacting with them.

    Only admins need to see players exp for punishments or for other reasons. Which I'm sure could be added to the pannel if needed.

    • Like 3
    • NAY 1
  7. Instead of making LEOs leave labs up I suggest a timer change on new labs. 

    If there was no timer on labs being remade after one got taken down, there would be no issues. 
     

    This would allow each lab to be shut down when it makes sense in RP, without causing issues where there are 0 labs or a very limited amount. 

  8. 6 minutes ago, addybeta said:

    This comes back to the fact that Crim RP will cease to exist, as per now, whenever a gang holds a lab they are bound to get rolled up on by Metro and DB, I can assure you I am not the only one who feels this way. Thay is why I am saying that something needs to change.

    There are meant to be 5 active labs but its bugged. Instead of people creating a bug reports that would help, they would rather sit and cry on the forums until a cop who doesn't even use the labs has to post it. More labs is a less chance of it getting raided. Also labs don't get raided that often, some days more than others but on average its less than ONE per day from what I have seen on duty.

     

    • polarcop 1
  9. 3 minutes ago, John Nut said:

    Yes, thats exatcly why we have been told that old Lab rules dont apply anymore.  After raiding my first lab in SED after the rotating labs, I said.  "Are we not meant to leave the lab alone unless a LEGAL specifically calls about a LAB.  I was told by Staff this does not apply anymore.

      Now if you get a call from inside an active lab, it gets raided no matter what, as it has for the past weeks.  constantly being raided. 

    That makes perfect sense. Why would LEOs leave a lab up if they see one? There are only a few active at once and if one is found though IC reasons its shut down and a new one is created.

  10. 11 minutes ago, addybeta said:

    I would like to see a change, where there is actually a proper reason to go into a lab, and I don't want to hear, It's IC, becuase its affected a lot of crim's OOCly along with me. 

    This is already a rule. You have been in PD and SD so you should know this by now.

    • Like 1
  11. This thread is coming from zero knowledge of the internal work of detectives and their protocols.

    I can’t speak on SIB as they are another department. Iv been a detective for long enough to know that people don’t just go undercover to bait fights but do go undercover for many reasons and always have an objective in mind.

    There are IC protocols and reasons for certain weapons to be used. There are situations where guns are needed as plan B, just as in life you should always expect the worse and be prepared. 

    Like always you only see whats going on from your perspective. You dont see the planning, tac communication between DB and METRO. You don’t know the full reason we do things and im not going to sit down and explain everything to you. I can only speak for myself but each time guns are needed and we know that METRO is called and is ready to respond.

    Labs have been mentioned a few times here. Each time we go to a lab its for an IC reason with supported backup.

    As always if you have a situation that you feel isn’t right you can make an IA report OOC and it will be investigated each time. 

    @John Nut I see you mention you have seen these issues from your SED character. I hate to say it but DB and METRO have a good standing IC and they are called all the time to assist. If SED aren’t being called to help SIB thats an internal issue and doesn’t represent every department. 

    • Like 2
    • yooo 2
  12. I think the bank timers should be lower a considerable amount. Even if the timer is lowered to 1 days its a step in the right direction. 
     

    However I personally think the bank timers should be lower than 1 days. Maybe if the banks were more available people would use different methods for evading or even use a hostage. Currently since the banks are limited the criminals have to get away or risk waiting 2 days for new banks. 

    • Like 5
    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.