DeanThompson Posted July 30, 2018 Report Share Posted July 30, 2018 It seems odd that civilians can have guns which kill people but can't have non-lethal means of protection such as a tazer. Tazers don't really give any unfair advantage to players and I don't believe they would be used in an abusive way (any more so than players already can break rules i.e. DM & VDM). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...