Alimaloul Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Player(s) being reported: id 30 . Date of interaction reported: 02/07/2026. Unix time stamp from HUD: 1783014683. Your character name: Mikel Handerson. Other player(s) involved: unknown Specific rule(s) broken: Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player without a proper in-character (IC) motive and/or prior escalation. How did the player break the rule(s)? (300 words maximum) I was cooking at a lab, and after I finished, I took my stuff and was heading home to stash it. On the way, a couple of Locos started chasing me. I eventually stopped to talk to them, and they forced me to get out of my vehicle so they could search me for weapons. I refused at first, so one of them shot my tire and searched me anyway. I don't have a problem with that part since it makes sense in an RP situation. The issue happened after everything was already over. They were about to leave when one of them told me not to make a problem out of what happened. He suddenly got agitated and killed me. From my point of view, there was no valid RP reason to kill me at that point. The situation was already resolved, also I wasn't resisting. That's why I believe this was DM. Evidence of rule breach https://imgur.com/a/JGD54na Quote
YuSoHelpful Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Hello, I'll make this easy for the responding moderator or above taking this report by responding right away. The reporting party claims I've broken the following rule: Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player without a proper in-character (IC) motive and/or prior escalation. However, in the initial talk whilst you pulled over, you say: this is not our agreement and that it's going to be a problem. This is a big part of the reason why I shot you, as we're not looking for a Rooks vs. Lost MC beef here, when you are the one who ran away from an active lab and were given demands in said lab. So you said it's going to be a problem, as I'm speaking to Ricky in the MonstroCiti behind, he's asking me if we will win the turf war against you if you decide to drop on our dealers like you did with Rooks. So, you saying it's going to be a problem, is a big part of the situation and critical in the evidence of this report. When they're done robbing you, I'm telling you to not make this a problem as can be heard clearly in the video. Yet you state something along the lines of, "It is going to be a problem". So now you've told me twice it's going to be a problem, and force me to end this conflict right here and there. I step out and shoot you, tell you it's not going to be a problem anymore and finish you. I think this is in clear contrast of the following statement: Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player without a proper in-character (IC) motive and/or prior escalation, it's actually quite the contrary. I'd like to ask the reporting party, if he has longer footage, maybe from the moment inside the lab where he was given demands to prove he actually didn't hear them and to show we have been following him since that time. Also, you can't be heard speaking in this evidence for some reason, yet you speaking is what got you killed.... with actual clear (IC) motive. To end a possible gang conflict from happening. (As you won't remember what happend anyway by following the NLR rule.) Kind regards, Luca Marcello (ID 30) Quote
Scarface Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago PENDING REVIEW ―――――――――――――――― This is now pending review by myself. Please be patient while the evidence is reviewed. Please refrain from any back and forth and respond only when inquired upon. Regards, Senior Moderator Scarface Quote
Scarface Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago PENDING RESPONSE ―――――――――――――――― Thank you for your patience while this report is under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s): Mikel_Handerson [8] - @Alimaloul Do you have video evidence which includes the audio of yourself during this interaction? If the following player(s) above fail to respond to this report within the next forty-eight (48) hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Please refrain from any back and forth and respond to your inquiry only. Regards, Senior Moderator Scarface Quote
