Jump to content

Colt_Smith [217] - NRP, Metagaming (maybe)

Recommended Posts

Player(s) being reported: 217
Date of interaction reported: 06/06/2021
Unix time stamp from HUD: 1622932700

Your character name: Peter_Rastafish
Other player(s) involved: 

Specific rule(s) broken:

9. Non-Roleplay (NRP)

  • Actions that are unrealistic or promote poor quality roleplay are considered as non-roleplay.

8. Metagaming (MG)

  • Metagaming is the act of relaying IC information through any method not considered IC that has the potential to change current or future roleplay scenarios or using that information. 

How did the player break the rule(s)?  (300 words maximum)
I drove past a police officer on a bike but I did not realise he was a police officer, he was wearing green so at first I believed he was in the Irish gang, the officer followed me into the drug location, he didn't really speak much but just lingered about. As I left the place he attempts to pull me over, I assume for my pistol and calls me out by my name which I thought was odd considering I believe I have never interacted with this officer although I may be wrong.

I drive away and later I get a call from him through the phone saying that charges have been added to my record and I should hand myself in, I then PM'd him to ask how he knew my name as I currently believe that he checked the license plates of my BF400, which ICly there are no license plates, I asked him through PM's to see if he could verify whether or not he did abuse this and he was being stubborn and not giving me an answer which makes me believe more that he broke the rules and got my info through abuse.


I am genuinely just here to seek the clarification as I do not want to serve in character time for a rulebreak, therefore I am here to check. This could have been resolved had ID 217 not been so stubborn and difficult.

I would just like some form of proof that he had me aliased and did not infact abuse the feature of checking a BF400s license plates. If not I want the charges dropped at the minimum

Evidence of rule breach:



  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story:

  • [Notified In-Game] - Colt_Smith (217) - Please explain how you were able to identify the person on the bike. Please provide any more information you may have.

If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. 

Puzzling & GiorgosK

Link to comment
Share on other sites



After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we have come to a conclusion:

  • License plates from BF400's can be scanned with the tools of a cruiser. Also, the player had the knowledge of your character and interacted accordingly.

If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format.

This report is denied and archived.

Kind regards,
Moderator Giorgos & Senior Support Puzzling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.