Jump to content
CJO

Ronald_Pecker [281], Dan_Carter [95], Jacque_Scott [416] - VDM

Recommended Posts

Player(s) being reported: ID 281, ID 95, ID 416

Date of interaction reported: 22/5/2021.
Unix time stamp from HUD: 1621717053

Your character name: Caleb Daigo
Other player(s) involved:

Specific rule(s) broken:
14. Deathmatch (DM)

 

  • Players on foot should only be attempted to be hit with a vehicle once with valid motive.

How did the player break the rule(s)?  (300 words maximum)
I was leaving the bank when ID 281 runs over me I get up then he backs up to hit me again and starts to loot my items

I would like to DM the staff member taking the report the video because I was listening to music and it shows my spotify which shows my full name and other information.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PENDING RESPONSE
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

After reviewing this report, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s): 

  • [@Caleb_Barker] - Caleb_Daigo - Please send your evidence to Yputi#0001 on Discord.

If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. 

Regards,
GiorgosK & Yputi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PENDING RESPONSE
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story:

  • Ronald_Pecker (281) - In the provided footage it appears that the reporting party was ran over by a reversing vehicle that was occupied by you and player ID 95, you being the driver. Then, you were seen taking stuff from the reporting party's inventory, driving off with him on the roof.
    Please explain your side of the story and present any evidence you may have.

  • Dan_Carter (95) - Please explain your side of the story. Present any evidence you may have.

  • Jacque_Scott (416) - In the footage it appeared a bike that was being operated by you ran over the reporting party, resulting in fully killing the person.
    Please explain your side of the story and present any evidence you may have.

If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. 

Regards,
GiorgosK & Yputi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Yputi said:

PENDING RESPONSE
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story:

  • Ronald_Pecker (281) - In the provided footage it appears that the reporting party was ran over by a reversing vehicle that was occupied by you and player ID 95, you being the driver. Then, you were seen taking stuff from the reporting party's inventory, driving off with him on the roof.
    Please explain your side of the story and present any evidence you may have.

  • Dan_Carter (95) - Please explain your side of the story. Present any evidence you may have.

  • Jacque_Scott (416) - In the footage it appeared a bike that was being operated by you ran over the reporting party, resulting in fully killing the person.
    Please explain your side of the story and present any evidence you may have.

If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. 

Regards,
GiorgosK & Yputi

Hi this is Dan Carter, can I view this footage? I need to rejog my memory.

19 hours ago, Yputi said:

PENDING RESPONSE
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story:

  • Ronald_Pecker (281) - In the provided footage it appears that the reporting party was ran over by a reversing vehicle that was occupied by you and player ID 95, you being the driver. Then, you were seen taking stuff from the reporting party's inventory, driving off with him on the roof.
    Please explain your side of the story and present any evidence you may have.

  • Dan_Carter (95) - Please explain your side of the story. Present any evidence you may have.

  • Jacque_Scott (416) - In the footage it appeared a bike that was being operated by you ran over the reporting party, resulting in fully killing the person.
    Please explain your side of the story and present any evidence you may have.

If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. 

Regards,
GiorgosK & Yputi

Hi this is Dan Carter, can I view this footage? I need to rejog my memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PENDING RESPONSE
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

  • Ronald_Pecker (281)

  • Dan_Carter (95) | @Dan Carter

  • Jacque_Scott (416) | @Jacque Scott

    The evidence has been edited so it does not contain personal information of the reporting party. This is done by myself.

  • https://streamable.com/0tfyzd

  • https://streamable.com/9w8y2k

    Please respond on the message that was posted earlier, requesting explanations, within 24 hours. Else, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. 

    Regards,
    GiorgosK & Yputi

Edited by Yputi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for sending that over. I have just reviewed the footage and I can fully recall what happened in that moment. We were driving and then Ronald hit the guy and then he said he was sorry and then Ronald drove off. Plus he wasn't on top of the car on my pov, he was behind the car after the crash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the footage. As I recall this moment after watching this, I do remember that I was cruising on the road and as I was driving didn't see that there was a person on of the car which the victim was on and when he fell off I was too late to react and ran the victim over. Thus in the clip you can see that I was not prepared and almost ran into the building while trying to avoid the victim. Such action was not intentional and I apologize for this misunderstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

REPORT ACCEPTED
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

 

After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s):

  •  Ronald_Pecker (281) - Deathmatching (Vehicle)

To explain the decision of the outcome of the report, I would like to turn your attention to the provided evidence of the reporting party.
The reporting party was walking on the side of the road. A Warrener with the driver being Ronald_Pecker (281) can be seen reversing, turning towards the reporting party at the end. This caused the reporting party to get injured. In the beginning of the second clip that has been shared in this report, Ronald_Pecker (281) is taking stuff from the reporting party’s inventory. Ronald_Pecker (281) gets back in the vehicle after that, driving off with the injured person still being on the roof. The vehicle drives with the injured person on the roof for approximately 2 seconds before the person falls off due to the reached speed. At the end of the provided evidence, Jacque_Scott (416) ran over the reporting party very shortly after falling on the ground from the roof of the car.

Ronald_Pecker (281) did not provide their side of the story and did not present any evidence. 
The footage did not show any form of an accident that took place. After the reporting party got hit by the vehicle, Ronald_Pecker (281) robbed the reporting party and took off again. It did not appear to involve any other intentions other than attacking/hurting this player, causing the player to get injured to then rob him.

 

If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. 

Regards,
GiorgosK & Yputi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.