Jump to content

DM ID 72, ID 2

Recommended Posts

Player(s) being reported: ID 72, ID 2
Date of interaction reported: 11-10-2019
Unix time stamp from HUD: 1570801066

Your characters name: Zilian Dent

Other player(s) involved: Amir Khan, Haris Khan

Specific rule(s) broken:

14. Deathmatch (DM)

  • Deathmatching is the act of attacking a player or their property without a proper roleplay reason.

  • Examples of valid reasons to attack another player:

• If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property.

• If they report you to the police for a serious crime.

• If they are not in compliance with demands, attempt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules.

  • A player cannot kill their victim if the victim is in compliance with the demands.

  • A player must allow their victim enough time to comply with the demands.

  • If a player informs you that your VOIP isn’t working, you must either fix your VOIP using appropriate commands or use text to deliver your demand(s).

  • Vehicles cannot be used to attack another player more than once including a failed attempt.

  • Attacking another player with no engagement in roleplay is not allowed.

  • Killing a player that has obeyed all orders and demands during a roleplay situation is allowed, with roleplay, only within 3 hours of:

    1.  Severe hostile or criminal action is taken against you, e.g. someone is robbing you at gunpoint. (Excluding police aiming a gun at you.)

    2.   Someone is attempting to take your life.

    3.   Someone is attempting to take the life of your close friend or ally, or if you have witnessed it happen.

  • You must explain your reason to kill to the player IC and have OOC evidence proving your reason.

How did the player break the rule(s)?

ID 72 shot comitted 2 counts of DM by shooting ID 26 and ID 98 with no roleplay interaction. ID 2 shot me without any roleplay interaction

Evidence of rule breach:


  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ID 72 here, I think you are mistaken of the guy. I never was in a vehicle the whole fight, infact i came in a bike and never got into a vehicle midfight not even when the shootout ended. But let me tell you this, You just happen to hear my voice when i finished the injured Travis Deshawn and you checked on the list and totally assumed me, I was a backup ally and got a call for the shootout and i was present when the shots were fired, There is no DM at all. Please provide a clear evidence of whatever you said or else that would be a pure hate transferred OOCly. And if you have no evidence of what you said, I will report you for making out false reports (just hating on the forums)

Now there is a rule stating, if there is a gang on gang shootout anyone inserts himself would be considered as a hostile. Anyone inserts himself into a hostile situation (shootout aka by pulling out his gun or aiming) without intent to run or fear is considered a target. When i came out of the side, i finished them both laying on the ground. as i was actively participating in the shootout i decided to finish them up to not give out IC information on the radio. As of my knowledge, This was a planned ambush. We were very smart in using our radio communications. EVERYONE PARTICIPATED IN AN ACTIVE SHOOTOUT IS A TARGET. You are trying to bring this war to an OOC Level, because of your IC loss. You are trying so hard to get us in trouble. I strongly recommend we keep this IC. Finishing person during a shootout is NOT  DM 

Thank you & Goodluck.

Edited by ahmedzaid
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thank you for your patience while this report was under review.

After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s):

  • You enter a situation attempting to hurt his allies. You engage with heavy weaponry, and take ones life (later you down another), and then you are killed by 2 others that are in front and behind you. This was not a civil conversation, you had clearly just murdered their ally, and were hostile. This appears to be a single shootout to me, not 2 different instances. As such, I believe he had every right to finish the individuals in this video who were already downed. 

This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.