Deathmatching, Mixing, Powergaming and Non RP

[Emulsify]

Player(s) being reported: ID 231, ID 240 and ID 8

 

Date of interaction reported: 19/09/2019

 

Unix time stamp from HUD: 1569781403

 

Your characters name: James_Harrington

 

Other player(s) involved: Thomas_Pennyworth ( @Pegasus_ )

 

Specific rule(s) broken:

 

ID 231 - Deathmatching X2:

A player cannot kill their victim if the victim is in compliance with the demands.

A player must allow their victim enough time to comply with the demands.

Attacking another player with no engagement in roleplay is not allowed.

 

ID 240 - Mixing:

Players are required to remain in-character (IC) at all times.

Text chat, VOIP, radio, phone and commands like /ME and /do are to be used only for IC content.

IC content must not contain acronyms like “lol” or “u” or smiley faces excluding IC SMS.

For OOC content, players must use chat commands that encase the content in brackets. For example: (( this is OOC content )). OOC chat commands are /OOC, /O, /B, /PM and /F.

 

ID 8 - Powergaming and Non RP:

Forceful roleplay that does not give the other player a chance to roleplay their own response is considered powergaming. Other players must be given a chance to roleplay outcomes of actions.

IC content must not contain acronyms like “lol” or “u” or smiley faces excluding IC SMS.

 

How did the player(s) break the rules?

Firstly I would like to address as to why myself and Thomas_Pennyworth were chasing them. We had just received a call over the radio from an unknown person stating that they robbed a taxi driver. This footage can be provided if needed. I then met up with Thomas and as he was on duty at the time, tracked the GPS of the taxi. I then proceeded to follow him to where they were. We attempted to trap them between our vehicles which resulted in a failure. I assume that Thomas then went to pit the vehicle but also failed and instead tapped the vehicle from behind. I stayed back during all of this due to myself being inside of an expensive super car. Because of the failed manoeuvres performed by Thomas, the other players had the right to shoot at him. They proceeded to do this but also shooting at me.

This is the first part, ID 231 shot out of the vehicle at me for no reason issuing no demands. This is their first break of the deathmatching rule. They had no right to do this as I had not come into contact with their vehicle. For all they know I could have been just driving in the same proximity.

ID 231 managed to stall Thomas’s vehicle so I continued to follow them. They then veered a cross the highway and started to head to dirt. They then proceeded to hit multiple rocks and flip the vehicle. Realistically they would have been injured and have not been able to conduct their following actions. This accounts for all of the party. I slowed down my vehicle after seeing them flip multiple times, admittedly hitting a few bumps myself which did not flip or damage my vehicle. I then got out of the vehicle attempting to shoot at them or to hold them at gunpoint until the police arrived on scene. 

Instead all the players hopped out of the vehicle and ID 231 again proceeded to deathmatch me. I was complying to demands and didn’t even have time to put my hands up. They had no reason to shoot me. Then they proceeded to rob me and it was at this point I informed them that I would be reporting them in /b. 

ID 240 then responded in VOIP with “For what?” This was clearly in response to my statement in /b therefore mixing IC and OCC.

ID 8 then proceeded to rob me. His first course of action was to write: “/do Attempts to rob”. Then followed by, “/do s?” This is a misuse of the /do commands and very poor roleplay in general. After a few seconds they type in IC chat, “accept or u shot”. This is Non RP as the use of abbreviations in IC chat is disallowed. This could also be seen as mixing due to the fact that they used the word, “accept”.

After I respond in /do and accepted their frisk request, they then took all of the items inside of my inventory, bar my pistol 50 which was still inside of my holster. ID 8 took my radio then then used the command, “/ame smashes radio”. This is powergaming as I had no way to respond or RP the outcome. The robbery then proceeded on as normal, they took my battery and RPed taking my keys. Keep in mind this was all very basic RP. One of the commands used by ID 231 was, “/do takes battery s?” This is again a misuse of commands and Non RP.

Once they got into my vehicle and attempted to drive off, the car slid down into a ditch rendering it stuck. I then took out my weapon and shot them. I first attempted to stall the vehicle so they could not drive away and then moved towards the two players, ID 8 and ID 232. I shot ID 8 multiple times and managed to injure ID 231. ID 8 ran away down the street after being shot multiple times by a pistol 50 at point blank. This is Non RP. 

At this point the police arrived and there were no further rule breaks besides ID 231 accusing me of powergaming as they took my weapons. You can see in the evidence that there was no rp that let to this. I would also like to mention to the staff member who takes this report that once I was on the scene with ID 231 afterwards, he did not take it into OOC. 

Evidence of rule breach:
 
The evidence will be sent to the member of staff who reviews this report as it contains staff information. I would like to thank this member of staff also for taking the time out of their day to review this. Thank you.

Edited October 1, 2019 by Emulsify

[Pegasus_]

I also have footage of the situation on my end, with me shooting and hitting ID 8 some times and then following him on a chase into the ocean and onto an island, where they were stalling RP because they claimed we couldn't see them with the render distance (my footage shows them running into the water from the beach). I will upload my POV in two seperate videos later tonight or first thing tomorrow.

Edited September 30, 2019 by Pegasus_

[Pegasus_]

https://youtu.be/64Q4k5cDWEY

The first video here shows me and James responding to the situation and the "battle of the cars", with the reported party shooting at James when I was the one who lightly bumped them. They then stall my car when they start shooting at both of us. When I join them again I see they have James contained and I back up to call for police, as I don't want to risk James' life. The cops come and we talk about the situation shortly and then we hear shots, and the cops goes straight ahead for them, and I drive around the back of the dirt road to try and cut them off from any possible escape. One of them, ID 8, comes around, I get out my car and starts shooting him, hitting three or four time, but he's not downed and keeps running away. Lex Roth and I start chasing him, and also Tony Bucco who had arrived at the scene when I called for backup. At this point I had lost sight of ID 8, but as we continue running towards the oil refinery and the beach, I spot him right at the water, jumping in and start swimming, and I call it out.

 

https://youtu.be/DoV9Moru8Fw

The second video picks up where the first one ended. Me and Lex Roth start swimming towards the islands and ultimately the big island in the back. Lex gets there before me and apparently shoots ID 8, or maybe he fell off the cliff and unjured himself, he's wedged near the water at the bottom of a steep cliff. At around the 5 minute mark, ID 8 goes into OOC and asks how we found him, and I say we swam. This is where the stalling begins. He keeps saying that we couldn't see him, and when I say that we could he argues that render distance isn't that good, but clearly the first video shows that it is. My video cuts off here because my shadow play messed up and I wanted to make sure I got all the footage I could.

If you check the logs of the people involved in the situation (including a few other cops and medics from a medevac), you'll be able to see ID 8 keep on going in OOC chat that we couldn't possibly have seen him and that we're also breaking rules (I think he mentioned powergaming at one point). He keeps stalling RP, writing in OOC chat and not responding to the medics' /do several times.

[SantinoDeferro]

Hello @Emulsify!

Thank you for making the player report.

ID 231/Jimmy_Luca has 24 hours to respond with his side of the story.

ID 240/Max_Dike has 24 hours to respond with his side of the story.

ID 8/Sangres_Niznik has 24 hours to respond with his side of the story.

The player will be notified in-game.

SantinoDeferro

[ItzCrusherr]

Hello this is ID8 replying to this accusations made about me.first of all i would like to address that this accusation was made in September and is now October so i do not think this is allowed to be posted but farewell. I would first of all would like to say sorry for the use of abbreviation my reasoning for using abbreviations was for the fact that the person we were robbing was stalling we were waiting a long time a response if we could rob him to the point were we heard sirens so i had to act fast so i apologize in advanced for the use but i dont think it is fair that whoever we were robbing stalled so much.Second you accuse me of doing /ame smashes radio'. i did certainly not use this command and i would like if  you would post proof of me saying this and if i did i apologies again because this happen awhile ago.another thing i would like to point out is that taxi driver was not the one getting robbed and infact was an individual in red hoodie and i also didn't use /ame smashes radio when robbing the taxi driver because if i did that then how would i of been able to talk to the other taxi members?.another thing is the quote ''Accept or u shot'' i think i said that ooc not ic but dont quote me on that.When you accuse me of running whilst getting shot at i would like to go ahead and say you did hit me but im going to be fully honest and say you didnt hit me on my screen and i think this was because of desync my reasoning for this is if you go and watch the video you can see he shot me like 3 4 or maybe 5 times which of lead to my character in an injured stat which would of made my character run slower which would of gave time for the pursuer to get to me second of all after he hit me with the shots you can see my character looks completely fine and runs normal hence why i said it was desync another thing why i think its deysnc is because the player shooting me was using a .50 which ingame is a quite powerful pistol that is well able to kill a person in 5 shots in that distance.Also he did not give me demands he did not tell me to stop he just shot at me out of nowhere at 5:54 so that's death matching and non rp. one big thing i would like to point out is that  they said they saw me swim all the to that island which i know it isnt true and i have a picture to prove it is physically impossible to see me from the beach all the way from that beach.Also i am still allowed to smash his radio because i wasn't under fear RP even if i did which i know i didnt. To end it here i wont be replying to anyone but the admin for any questions he/she may have.And i am also sorry for using abbreviations but the fact is the person being robbed was stalling and did not answer rp so i panicked in hesitation and typed it fast because i heard police sirens. but i would like to say that the person that i was robbing was breaking the rule Non rp as he was stalling for a long time and aswell as the taxi driver that opened fire on me He broke deathmatching and non rp  because he did not give demands or instructions thank you.

[21kubes]

Hello, I was ID 231/Jimmy_Luca , who was reported for death matching X2. I would like you guys to notice that when I shot at James_Harrington and Thomas_Pennyworth, I had reason to. Even in the video, player 8/Sangres_Niznik can be heard saying "Y'all better keep a distance." This was 1:39 in the first video. The second time I shot, was during the robbery. We told James_Harrington to "not try anything", and he proceeded to talk in his radio, multiple times. We told him to stop talking (ic) and he continued. I shot him, to make him stop, which worked. Also I would like to add 3 points. A. This was our very first robbery, so we didn't know exactly how things go. B. At 5:54 in the first video, Thomas_Pennyworth opens fire on Sangres_Niznik without telling him to stop, or anything of the sorts. I'm pretty sure this is against the rules. Point C. This situation happened around a month ago, and I was told by a friend that reports are relevant for 48h. Sorry for the inconvenience

[Emulsify]

Thank you for your response @21kubes and @ItzCrusherr.

First and foremost i would like to apologise for the time it took for this report to be reviewed, i originally posted this within the allocated amount of time that evidence is valid for, 48 hours. It was unfortunately pushed to the back but kindly Moderator SantinoDeferro spotted this yesterday. I would also like to thank @SantinoDeferro for this. I would also like to point out that i am the individual in the red hoodie, sorry if this was unclear in the original report.

Secondly, i will be providing the evidence that you have requested in your responses. I am going to start off with @ItzCrusherr's. Your first statement is that i was stalling throughout this interaction, in the evidence that i provided to SantinoDeferro, it can be seen that i was typing for the majority of the time. I do have to admit that it was slow, but i was typing. Stalling mainly consists of withholding RP so that a different outcome can occur or that another party can arrive. In the evidence it is shown that i clearly was not stalling, i had no way of knowing that anyone else were plotting to help we or that the police were on their way. I sincerely apologise if you perceived this as stalling but it was not my intent.

After this you apologised for using the abbreviations, thank you for this. One point i would like to mention though is that you claim you were under stress from the approaching sirens. The sirens, however, only were audible at the end on the incident. Although it was seen that you started using abbreviations from the beginning. I would like to state for SantinoDeferro, that i think this should not be held against the reported party as stated by their response, this was their first robbery. From which i can gather you were all new to the server at the time. I also would like to think that all of your RP standards has risen greatly since then. Now i am going to move onto the /ame. 
https://imgur.com/RDHkvUz
It is shown in this picture that you did in fact type the /ame. This can also be seen in the chat logs. You also mention saying "Accept or u shot" in OOC chat.
https://imgur.com/e0tilKu
This shows that it was said IC. The next part you talk about is myself shooting you at the end. 
https://imgur.com/0MOku5s
This shows that i was even shooting you before you started running. I a lot shot each of you multiple times while inside of the vehicle. It could be desync, but ultimately it is up to SantinoDeferro.

Next you proceed to talk about how no demands were given when i shot each of the individuals, this is not against the rules and is not deathmatching.
Examples of valid reasons to attack another player:
• If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property.
• If they report you to the police for a serious crime.
• If they are not in compliance with demands, attempt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules.
This rule copied from the official Eclipse rule book state that one i allowed to attack another player if they attempt to hurt you, and ally or damage your property. Each of these had happened. I will leave the next part up to @Pegasus_ as i was not present during this.

Finally we move onto @21kubes response. They stated that demands were issued in the form of "Y'all better keep a distance." This was said while in a moving vehicle, with the windows up. This would RPLY not have been heard and it is also inaudible in both my evidence and @Pegasus_'s evidence. If this was also said as valid demands you gave neither of us any time to respond.
https://imgur.com/QfzgyCr

The second set of demands never happened.
https://imgur.com/imvPe2f
This shows the last time i spoke on the radio. The picture that follows shows the second set of shots. There were no demands between this time period and no possible way be myself hearing them either.
https://imgur.com/LXgaCn7 
Soon after this i stepped out of the vehicle and instantly put my hands up following the demands that were given.
https://imgur.com/hDChdZB
I was instantly shot while obeying fear RP. At no point did i touch my radio during this.

One last point i would like to mention is the accusation that Thomas_Pennyworth shot you with no demands and therefore broke the deathmathing rule. This was not the case as it can be seen multiple times that you shot his vehicle, harmed myself and possibly broke fear RP. These are all reasons that allow someone to attack another player.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, if any other evidence is needed, feel free to message myself.

Edited October 18, 2019 by Emulsify

[ItzCrusherr]

12 minutes ago, Emulsify said:

Thank you for your response @21kubes and @ItzCrusherr.

First and foremost i would like to apologise for the time it took for this report to be reviewed, i originally posted this within the allocated amount of time that evidence is valid for, 48 hours. It was unfortunately pushed to the back but kindly Moderator SantinoDeferro spotted this yesterday. I would also like to thank @SantinoDeferro for this. I would also like to point out that i am the individual in the red hoodie, sorry if this was unclear in the original report.

Secondly, i will be providing the evidence that you have requested in your responses. I am going to start off with @ItzCrusherr's. Your first statement is that i was stalling throughout this interaction, in the evidence that i provided to SantinoDeferro, it can be seen that i was typing for the majority of the time. I do have to admit that it was slow, but i was typing. Stalling mainly consists of withholding RP so that a different outcome can occur or that another party can arrive. In the evidence it is shown that i clearly was not stalling, i had no way of knowing that anyone else were plotting to help we or that the police were on their way. I sincerely apologise if you perceived this as stalling but it was not my intent.

After this you apologised for using the abbreviations, thank you for this. One point i would like to mention though is that you claim you were under stress from the approaching sirens. The sirens, however, only were audible at the end on the incident. Although it was seen that you started using abbreviations from the beginning. I would like to state for SantinoDeferro, that i think this should not be held against the reported party as stated by their response, this was their first robbery. From which i can gather you were all new to the server at the time. I also would like to think that all of your RP standards has risen greatly since then. Now i am going to move onto the /ame. 
https://imgur.com/RDHkvUz
It is shown in this picture that you did in fact type the /ame. This can also be seen in the chat logs. You also mention saying "Accept or u shot" in OOC chat.
https://imgur.com/e0tilKu
This shows that it was said IC. The next part you talk about is myself shooting you at the end. 
https://imgur.com/0MOku5s
This shows that i was even shooting you before you started running. I a lot shot each of you multiple times while inside of the vehicle. It could be desync, but ultimately it is up to SantinoDeferro.

Next you proceed to talk about how no demands were given when i shot each of the individuals, this is not against the rules and is not deathmatching.
Examples of valid reasons to attack another player:
• If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property.
• If they report you to the police for a serious crime.
• If they are not in compliance with demands, attempt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules.
This rule copied from the official Eclipse rule book state that one i allowed to attack another player if they attempt to hurt you, and ally or damage your property. Each of these had happened. I will leave the next part up to @Pegasus_ as i was not present during this.

Finally we move onto @21kubes response. They stated that demands were issued in the form of "Y'all better keep a distance." This was said while in a moving vehicle, with the windows up. This would RPLY not have been heard and it is also inaudible in both my evidence and @Pegasus_'s evidence. If this was also said as valid demands you gave neither of us any time to respond.
https://imgur.com/QfzgyCr

The second set of demands never happened.
https://imgur.com/imvPe2f
This shows the last time i spoke on the radio. The picture that follows shows the second set of shots. There were no demands between this time period and no possible way be myself hearing them either.
https://imgur.com/LXgaCn7 
Soon after this i stepped out of the vehicle and instantly put my hands up following the demands that were given.
https://imgur.com/hDChdZB
I was instantly shot while obeying fear RP. At no point did i touch my radio during this.

One last point i would like to mention is the accusation that Thomas_Pennyworth shot you with no demands and therefore broke the deathmathing rule. This was not the case as it can be seen multiple times that you shot his vehicle, harmed myself and possibly broke fear RP. These are all reasons that allow someone to attack another player.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, if any other evidence is needed, feel free to message myself.

Hey ya no worries at the time we were all new to crime and we’ve learned a lot from that incident but not too worry so what happends from here now?

[21kubes]

On my screen all the windows in the car were smashed, and when Id 8 said "y'all better keep your distance", the two cars were only a couple meters apart. I don't think that it was necessary to rp it, at least in our eyes. @ItzCrusherr can you confirm that? Unfortunately I don't have a screenshot to prove that, and I really doubt there's much of a point trying to argue with a support staff, because obviously what they say, goes.

[ItzCrusherr]

Just now, 21kubes said:

On my screen all the windows in the car were smashed, and when Id 8 said "y'all better keep your distance", the two cars were only a couple meters apart. I don't think that it was necessary to rp it, at least in our eyes. @ItzCrusherr can you confirm that? Unfortunately I don't have a screenshot to prove that, and I really doubt there's much of a point trying to argue with a support staff, because obviously what they say, goes.

Yes if I remember correctly they were because on our way to the highway we hit a barrier.besides that I wasn’t shooting anyone because If I had a gun i wouldn’t of ran away I would’ve stayed and shot @Emulsify.and @21kubes was the only person with a gun 

[Pegasus_]

Thank you to SantinoDeferro for dealing with this report, as well as for the other parties to respond. Just as @Emulsify has done, I would like to come with my own counterarguments.

 

Starting out with @21kubes comment about telling us to stay back, I'd like to say, just like Emulsify did, whatever you said was inaudible. After watching the video back, I can indeed see that two of you tried to say something (starts at about 1.38 in my first video), but even after turning up and rewatching it several times, I can still only barely make out what you said. Furthermore, and previously stated as well, at this time all vehicle were moving at around 80 km/h, at which point any form of speech, realistically, would not be heard by others outside that vehicle, making this point moot.

Regarding your second point, of me opening fire on @ItzCrusherr without reason or any demands given, I did very much have a right to do so. First of all, you had previously robbed a driver, my colleague and ally, and stolen his cab. Secondly, you shot at my vehicle, thereby engaging in roleplay and trying to hurt me and my property. Thirdly, you shot at James Harrington (Emulsify), another ally of mine. When that happened, and the cops and myself moved in, ItzCrusherr was clearly trying to escape from the situation, with all of these points being valid reason to attack another player, according to the rules regarding deathmatching, section 14:

Examples of valid reasons to attack another player:
1) If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property.
2) If they report you to the police for a serious crime.
3) If they are not in compliance with demands, attemt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules.

I would also like to point out that at no points in my first video was James heard talking on the radio with us while he was being held hostage by the three of you.

 

Now for ItzCrusherr's statement.

Regarding me shooting at you at 5.54 in my first video, I am not accusing you of anything there, I am merely stating the fact that I shot at you and hit you on my screen multiple times, but that you could still run. I was also only using a Combat pistol if that is of any interest, you can see the name as I pull it out after exiting the taxi. And as said before, I had several reasons and the right to shoot at you when you ran without saying something to you.

As for your statement about it being impossible for us to see you swim, my video clearly shows me watching you running on the beach and going into the ocean at 7.26.
This screenshot will shot it as well. https://imgur.com/a/TtWQVZ2
You are correct in saying that I did not see you swim to the big island, but from the direction you were running, all that was ahead of you was smaller islands standing out of the ocean, and when we did not find you there, the only logical thing would be that you had swam further ahead towards the big island.

 

And just like Emulsify said, this report was made a few hours after the incident, making the reporting completely valid, we were only waiting for admins to respond to the report.

Again, thanks to the admin for looking over the report and to the other parties for answering.

 

Edited October 18, 2019 by Pegasus_

[ItzCrusherr]

1 hour ago, Pegasus_ said:

Thank you to SantinoDeferro for dealing with this report, as well as for the other parties to respond. Just as @Emulsify has done, I would like to come with my own counterarguments.

 

Starting out with @21kubes comment about telling us to stay back, I'd like to say, just like Emulsify did, whatever you said was inaudible. After watching the video back, I can indeed see that two of you tried to say something (starts at about 1.38 in my first video), but even after turning up and rewatching it several times, I can still only barely make out what you said. Furthermore, and previously stated as well, at this time all vehicle were moving at around 80 km/h, at which point any form of speech, realistically, would not be heard by others outside that vehicle, making this point moot.

Regarding your second point, of me opening fire on @ItzCrusherr without reason or any demands given, I did very much have a right to do so. First of all, you had previously robbed a driver, my colleague and ally, and stolen his cab. Secondly, you shot at my vehicle, thereby engaging in roleplay and trying to hurt me and my property. Thirdly, you shot at James Harrington (Emulsify), another ally of mine. When that happened, and the cops and myself moved in, ItzCrusherr was clearly trying to escape from the situation, with all of these points being valid reason to attack another player, according to the rules regarding deathmatching, section 14:

Examples of valid reasons to attack another player:
1) If they attempt to arrest or hurt you, an ally, or damage your property.
2) If they report you to the police for a serious crime.
3) If they are not in compliance with demands, attemt to escape, or call other players for help in a situation where they are required to display fear under fear roleplay rules.

I would also like to point out that at no points in my first video was James heard talking on the radio with us while he was being held hostage by the three of you.

 

Now for ItzCrusherr's statement.

Regarding me shooting at you at 5.54 in my first video, I am not accusing you of anything there, I am merely stating the fact that I shot at you and hit you on my screen multiple times, but that you could still run. I was also only using a Combat pistol if that is of any interest, you can see the name as I pull it out after exiting the taxi. And as said before, I had several reasons and the right to shoot at you when you ran without saying something to you.

As for your statement about it being impossible for us to see you swim, my video clearly shows me watching you running on the beach and going into the ocean at 7.26.
This screenshot will shot it as well. https://imgur.com/a/TtWQVZ2
You are correct in saying that I did not see you swim to the big island, but from the direction you were running, all that was ahead of you was smaller islands standing out of the ocean, and when we did not find you there, the only logical thing would be that you had swam further ahead towards the big island.

 

And just like Emulsify said, this report was made a few hours after the incident, making the reporting completely valid, we were only waiting for admins to respond to the report.

Again, thanks to the admin for looking over the report and to the other parties for answering.

 

Im going to leave it at this as there is not much point arguing i did not have a gun and thats simpple if i did have a gun i wouldve remained at the scene and shot at the red hoodie dude.

[SantinoDeferro]

Hello everyone! 

REPORT ACCEPTED
 

Player ID 231/Jimmy_Luca will be receiving punishment for Deathmatch | Offence #2 | DM

• A player must allow their victim enough time to comply with demands;
• A player cannot kill their victim if the victim is in compliance with the demands. 
• Situation:  "Get out of the car, On your knees, on your fucking knees " -  Second later, ID 231 opened fire and shot James twice. 
• As well as you used /do command wrongfully "/do takes battery S?". Please go and look into our Roleplay Guide and pay attention in Commands section. I think it's well worth to read it through to get basic understanding how to use commands like /me /ame /do /my /amy. 

Player ID 240/Max_Dike will not receive any punishment.

• Keep in mind: Mixing IC and OOC information without any benefit is a minor MG offense,  James told that he will report all of you in forums, He used OOC channel for that and you asked him "For What?" over VOIP. VOIP is always IC. I will mark that down on your record, that we have spoken about Metagaming rule and especially mixing IC and OOC. 

Player ID 8/Sangres_Niznik will be receiving punishment for NonRP | Offence #5 | Breach of IC & OOC Interactions rule

• IC content must not contain acronyms like "lol" or "u" or smiley faces excluding IC SMS. Situation: "Accept or u shot. "
• As well as you used /do and /me commands wrongfully "/do Attempts to ROb /do S??". Please go and look into our Roleplay Guide and pay attention in Commands section. I think it's well worth to read it through to get basic understanding how to use commands like /me /ame /do /my /amy. 
• Keep in mind: Mixing IC and OOC information without any benefit is a minor MG offense. You told James "Stop stalling give us our shit." over VOIP (IC) channel. 
• I would like to remind you one of the rules as well: Swimming in water for an unrealistic amount of time or without destination during a chase is considered NonRP.  

Player ID 225/Thomas_Pennyworth will be receiving punishment for NonRP | Offence #2 | Poor quality roleplay

• It's mandatory to keep up high standards. Using and speaking over a radio while being under water is not what we looking for. (Your second video at 1:18)

Endnote: 

At the first part, demands were given but they were not clear. I discussed this situation with other members and we came to conclusion that would not be DM because they gave demands but both of you still progressed to follow them (even Thomas made attempt to stop them before it).

On 10/18/2019 at 7:01 PM, Emulsify said:

Finally we move onto @21kubes response. They stated that demands were issued in the form of "Y'all better keep a distance." This was said while in a moving vehicle, with the windows up. This would RPLY not have been heard and it is also inaudible in both my evidence and @Pegasus_'s evidence. If this was also said as valid demands you gave neither of us any time to respond.

I am just commenting on that. You could not hear what they said there but you were able to hear what Thomas said earlier and you even responded to him. (Thomas first video at 1:19)

 

Regards,

Moderator SantinoDeferro

Report locked & archived.