Jump to content

Metagaming and Non RP ID16/192 & ID184

Recommended Posts

Player(s) being reported: ID16/192 (same person) & ID184  ( Metagaming Non-Roleplay (NRP) )
Date of interaction reported: August 28, 2019
Unix time stamp from HUD: 1567035087 & 1567035367

characters name: Klay Thompson

Other player(s) involved:

Specific rule(s) broken:

8. Non-Roleplay (NRP)

  • Players who disconnect during roleplay must reconnect and inform other parties in order to resume roleplay. If you are unable to reconnect it may be excused after providing proof.


9. Metagaming (MG)

  • Metagaming is the act of relaying IC information through any method not considered IC that has the potential to change current or future roleplay scenarios or using that information. 

  • Mixing IC and OOC information without any benefit is a minor MG offense. For example, a player uses IC chat to call someone by their player ID displayed above their head.

How did the player break the rule(s)?

ID 16 Had robbed me at gun point, taking my gun and Bike then proceeding to drive off and get into an altercation with the police. In the very short pursuit he had crashed my bike and injured themselves unable to get back up then immediately timed out, PD drove away for another call. I waited around to see if they would reconnect, about 5 minutes later two people on bikes showed up in the exact spot and he reconnected as player ID 192, player ID 184 then ran up to him, picked him up and carried them to the hospital with no words being exchanged. I believe they were communicating through discord.

Evidence of rule breach:




Edited by Assured
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, and thank you for making this player report! @Assured

Prior to me moving forward with this report, do you have any additional evidence of this situation taking place? As the provided screenshot(s) does not provide me with a good enough overview of the situation and the supposed rulebreak to assess. If so, please provide said evidence in your response. Thank you!

Kind regards,


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, and thank you for remaining patient while waiting for an answer. After extensively reviewing this report, i have decided to conclude it based on the evidence and statement provided to me by the reporting party.

As the reporting party has no additional evidence of the Metagaming and Non-Roleplay violation taking place, i will unfortunately have to reject and close this report on the basis of insufficient evidence. The provided screenshots in this report does not suffice as evidence, and does not provide me with a good overview of the entire situation and the supposed rulebreak(s) to assess. I suggest for future reference to use the various different recording softwares that are free and easy to use for recording your gameplay sessions, should you encounter these types of situations at some point in the future.

Thank you for making this report! @Assured

Report is rejected and archived.

Kind regards,


Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.